Skip to main content
Log in

Intra-Industry Trade in Intermediate Goods and Final Goods in a General Equilibrium Setting

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article develops a dual general equilibrium model to analyze the effects of intra-industry trade in both intermediate goods and final goods on the productivity in the final good production. Intra-industry trade in intermediate goods determines an increase in the number of intermediate good varieties available in the final good production, and intra-industry trade in final goods determines a reduction in the number of adaptations of an intermediate good to the final good production. Thereby, the productivity in the final good production increases. Different shares of intra-industry trade in intermediate goods and final goods in a general equilibrium setting implies that Jones' “magnification effect” and both the Rybczynski theorem and the Stolper-Samuelson theorem are not valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amano, Akihiro (1963) “Neo-Classical Models of International Trade and Economic Growth.” Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash and Joseph Stiglitz (1977) “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Variety.” American Economic Review 67:297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, J. Wilfred (1979) “Internationally Decreasing Costs andWorld Trade.” Journal of International Economics 9:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1982) “National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade.” The American Economic Review 72(3):389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, David and Chris R. Milner (1987) “Intra-Industry Trade: Current Perspectives and Unresolved Issues.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 123(1):39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D. and J. Torstensson (1997) “Back to the Future: Taking Stock on Intra-Industry Trade.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133(2):249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, Elhanan (1981) “International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale and Monopolistic Competition.” Journal of International Economics 11:305–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, Elhanan and Krugman, Paul (1985) “Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy.” Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. Ronald (1968) “Variable Returns to Scale in General Equilibrium Theory.” International Economic Review 10:261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul (1979) “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 9(4):469–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Kelvin (1979) “Variety, Equity and Efficiency.” New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, Teit (2001a) “Intra-Industry Trade in Intermediate Goods.” International Advances in Economic Research 7(4):393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (2001b) “The Conditions for the Formation of a Vertical Integrated Multinational Enterprise.” Journal of Global Business 12(23):47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, Akira (1963) “On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth: A Comparative Statics Analysis.” Review of Economic Studies 30(2):95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, E. Oliver (1981) “The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes.” Journal of Economic Literature 19:1537–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Kar-yiu (1995) “International Trade in Goods and Factor Mobility.” Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lüthje, T. Intra-Industry Trade in Intermediate Goods and Final Goods in a General Equilibrium Setting. Open Economies Review 14, 191–209 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022366030762

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022366030762

Navigation