Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reply to Comments on Comparison of Observations from a Laboratory Model with Stochastic Theory: Initial Analysis of Hydraulic and Tracer Experiments, Transport in Porous Media 52, 111–115, 2003

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dagan, G.: 1989, Flow and Transport in Porous Formations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 465 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, S. and Zheng, L.: 2001, Comparison of observations from a laboratory model with stochastic theory: initial analysis of hydraulic and tracer experiments, Transport in Porous Media 42(1), 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 87544, U.S.A

    Li Zheng

  2. Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, U.S.A

    Stephen E. Silliman

Authors
  1. Li Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen E. Silliman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, L., Silliman, S.E. Reply to Comments on Comparison of Observations from a Laboratory Model with Stochastic Theory: Initial Analysis of Hydraulic and Tracer Experiments, Transport in Porous Media 52, 111–115, 2003. Transport in Porous Media 52, 117–118 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022363315781

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022363315781

Keywords

Search

Navigation