Abstract
In a number of recent controversial adoption cases, courts have been forced to decide if an unwed father should be granted custody of his child when the mother purposely fails to inform him of the child's birth or of her intention to place the child for adoption. The current study utilized three bi-variate independent variables from which eight vignettes were created depicting scenarios modeled on actual court cases. It was conducted as a preliminary investigation intended to examine the factors which are important to people when making custody decisions, to see if the importance of these factors varies with circumstance, and to examine their concurrence with factors utilized in judicial decisions. The results suggest that although subjects stress the importance of characteristics associated with being a good parent, the specific circumstances of each separate case and also the subject's gender have influential effects on custody decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adoption of Michael H., 29 Cal.App.4th 252, 29 Cal.Rptr.2d 2551 (1994).
Allen, N. E. (1993). Adoption of Kelsey S.: When does an unwed father know best? Pacific Law Journal, 24, 1633-1680.
Boccaccini, M. T., & Willemsen, E. (in press). Contested adoption and the liberty interest of the child. Saint Thomas Law Review.
Brems, C., Carssow, K. L., Shook, C., Sturgill, S., & Cannava, P. (1995). Assessment of fairness in child custody decisions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 345-353.
Coltrane, S., & Hickman, N. (1992). The rhetoric of rights and needs: Moral discourse in the reform of child custody and child supportive laws. Social Problems, 39, 400-420.
Cavan v, Mohammed, 441 U.S. 390 (1979).
Ganong, L. H., Coleman, M., & Mistina, D. (1995). Home is where they have to let you in: Beliefs regarding physical custody changes of children following divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 466-487.
Gustafson, J. B. (1993). The natural father I presume: The natural father's rights versus the best interests of the child. San Diego Justice Journal, 1, 489-501.
Hadad, E. A., (1990). Tradition and the liberty interest: Circumscribing the rights of the natural father. Brooklyn Law Review, 56, 291-328.
In re Baby Girl Claussen, 496 N. W. 2d 236 (Iowa 1992).
In re Bridget R., 41 Cal.App. 4th 1483 (Cal. 1996).
In re Jasmon O. 8 Cal. 4th 398 (Cal. 1994).
In re Kelsey S., 823 P. 2d 1216 (Cal. 1992).
Kirsch, L. (1994). Unwed fathers and their newborn children placed for adoption: Protecting the rights of both in custody disputes. Arizona Law Review, 36, 1011-1031.
Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248 (1983).
Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989).
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976).
Quilloin v. Wallcott, 434 U.S. 246 (1978).
Rausch, R. S. (1980). Unwed fathers and the adoption process. William and Mary Law Review, 22, 85-140.
Rompf, E. L. (1993). Open adoption: What does the –ldaverage person–rd think? Child Welfare, 72, 219-230.
Sachdev, P. (1991). The birth father: A neglected element in the adoption equation. Families in Society, 72(3), 131-138.
Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972).
Wehner, K. C. (1994). Daddy wants rights too: A perspective on adoption statutes. Houston Law Review, 31, 691-719.
Willemsen, E. (1996). Attachment 101 for attorneys: Implications for infant placement decisions. Santa Clara Law Review, 36, 439-475.
Woodhouse, B. B. (1993). Hatching the egg: A child-centered perspective on parents' rights. Cardozo Law Review, 14, 1747-1864.
Zdon, T. M. (1994). Putative fathers' rights: Striking the right balance in adoption laws. William Mitchell Law Review, 20, 930-966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willemsen, E.W., Boccaccini, M. & Pardini, D. Factors Influencing Custody Decisions in Contested Adoption Cases . Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 16, 127–147 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022361407713
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022361407713