Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phylogeography of Sex Ratio and Multiple Mating in Stalk-Eyed Flies from Southeast Asia

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The factors maintaining sex chromosome meiotic drive, or sex ratio (SR), in natural populations remain uncertain. Coevolution between segregation distortion and modifiers should produce transient SR distortion while selection can result in a stable polymorphism. We hypothesize that if SR is maintained by selection, then phylogenetically related populations should exhibit similar SR frequency and intensity. Furthermore, when drive is present, females should mate with multiple males more often both to insure fertility and to increase the probability of producing male progeny. In this paper we report on variation in SR frequency and multiple mating among seven populations and three species of stalk-eyed flies, genus Cyrtodiopsis, from southeast Asia. Using a phylogenetic hypothesis based on 1100 bp of mtDNA sequence we find that while sex chromosome meiotic drive is present in all populations of C. whitei and C. dalmanni, the frequency and intensity of drive only differs between populations or species with greater than 4.8% sequence divergence. The frequency of females mating with multiple males is higher in populations with SR. In addition, SR males mate less often, possibly to compensate for sperm depletion. Our results suggest that sex chromosome drive is maintained by balancing selection in populations of C. whitei and C. dalmanni. Nevertheless, coevolution between drive and suppressors deserves further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atlan, A., H. Mercot, C. Landre & C. Montchamp-Moreau, 1997. The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: Geographical distribution of distortion and resistance. Evolution 51: 1886–1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.H., G.S. Wilkinson & R. Desalle, 2001. The phylogenetic utility of different types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Syst. Biol. 50: 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, J.W.O., B. Chernoff & A.C. James, 2002. Divergence of mitochondrial DNA is not corroborated by nuclear DNA, morphology, or behavior in Drosophila simulans. Evolution 56: 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckenbach, A.T., 1996. Selection and the 'sex-ratio' polymorphism in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 50: 787–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A.B. & S.C. Vaz, 1999. Are Drosophila SR chromosomes always balanced? Heredity 83: 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A.B., S.C. Vaz & L.B. Klaczko, 1997. Polymorphism for Y-linked suppressors of sex-ratio in two natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata. Genetics 146: 891–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazemajor, M., C. Landre & C. Montchamp-Moreau, 1997. The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: genetic analysis of distortion and suppression. Genetics 147: 635–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazemajor, M., D. Joly & C. Montchamp-Moreau, 2000. Sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans is related to equational nondisjunction of the Y chromosome. Genetics 154: 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A. & H.A. Orr, 1993. Further evidence against meioticdrive models of hybrid sterility. Evolution 47: 685–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A., B. Charlesworth & H.A. Orr, 1991. Haldane rule revisited. Evolution 45: 1710–1714.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P., T. Bjorksten, K. Fowler & A. Pomiankowski, 2000. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406: 186–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Motte, I. & D. Burkhardt, 1983. Portrait of an Asian stalkeyed fly. Naturwiss 70: 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T., 1958. Genetics of natural populations. XXVII. The genetic changes in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura in the American Southwest. Evolution 12: 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.W.F., 1961. The population genetics of 'sex-ratio' in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Heredity 16: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A., 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, S.A., 1991. Divergence of meiotic drive-suppression systems as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution 45: 262–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig, D. & C.T. Bergstrom, 1995. Multiple mating, sperm competition and meiotic drive. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T. & S. Arnold, 1987. Multiple mating by females-a perspective from quantitative genetics. Anim. Behav. 35: 939–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D., 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156: 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannebuth, T., K. Stattegger & P.M. Grootes, 2000. Rapid flooding of the Sunda shelf-a late-glacial sea-level record. Science 288: 1033–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschteck-Jungen, E., 1990. Postmating reproductive isolation and modification of the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila subobscura induced by the sex chromosome gene arrangement A2+3+5+7. Genetica 83: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, L. & A. Pomiankowski, 1991. Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomenon. Genetics 128: 841–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike, J., 1996. Sex-ratio meiotic drive in the Drosophila quinaria group. Am. Nat. 148: 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiggins, F.M., G.D.D. Hurst & M.E.N. Majerus, 1999. How common are meiotically driven sex chromosomes? Am. Nat. 154: 481–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.A. & C.-I. Wu, 1992. An empirical test of the meiotic drive models of hybrid sterility: sex-ratio data from hybrids between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia. Genetics 130: 507–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. & G.S. Wilkinson, 1999. Models of sex-ratio meiotic drive and sexual selection in stalk-eyed flies. Genet. Res. 74: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, P., G.S. Wilkinson & P.R. Reillo, 1993. Copulation duration and sperm precedence in the Malaysian stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diptera: Diopsidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyttle, T.W., 1991. Segregation distorters. Ann. Rev. Genetics 25: 511–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyttle, T.W., 1993. Cheaters sometimes prosper: distortion of Mendelian segregation by meiotic drive. Trends Genet. 9: 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T.A., 1996. Evolution of Drosophila mating systems. Evol. Biol. 29: 73–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montchamp-Moreau, C. & D. Joly, 1997. Abnormal spermiogenesis is associated with the X-linked sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans. Heredity 79: 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, H.A. & D.C. Presgraves, 2000. Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules. Bioessays 22: 1085–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Daaku, K.O., R.J. Wood & R.D. Butler, 1997. Selected lines of Aedes aegypti with persistently distorted sex ratios. Heredity 79: 388–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palopoli, M.F. & C.-I. Wu, 1996. Rapid evolution of a coadapted gene complex: evidence from the segregation distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143: 1675–1688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski, A. & L.D. Hurst, 1993. Genomic conflicts underlying Haldane's rule. Genetics 133: 425–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presgraves, D.C., E. Severence & G.S. Wilkinson, 1997. Sex chromosome meiotic drive in stalk-eyed flies. Genetics 147: 1169–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold, K., 1998. Sex linkage among genes controlling sexually selected traits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, M.G., 2000. The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, H.D., 1961. The genetic systems modifying meiotic drive in Drosophila paramelanica. Genetics 46: 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyskal, G.C., 1972. A catalogue of species and key to the genera of the family Diopsidae. Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. Ser. A 1–20.

  • Swofford, D.L., 2001 PAUP?: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4.0b8. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Y., D.L. Hartl & C.C. Laurie, 2001. Sex-ratio segregation distortion associated with reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 13183–13188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B., 1948. Studies on 'sex-ratio' in Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Selection and 'sex-ratio'. Evolution 2: 189–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G.S. & C.L. Fry, 2001. Meiotic drive alters sperm competitive ability in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 2559–2564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G.S. & M.I. Sanchez, 2001. Sperm development, age and sex chromosome meiotic drive in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis whitei. Heredity 87: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G.S. & M. Taper, 1999. Evolution of genetic variation for condition dependent traits in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1685–1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G.S., H. Kahler & R.H. Baker, 1998a. Evolution of female mating preferences in stalk-eyed flies. Beh. Ecol. 9: 525–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G.S., D.C. Presgraves & L. Crymes, 1998b. Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391: 276–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenbarger, L.L. & G.S. Wilkinson, 2001. Sex-linked expression of a sexually selected trait in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Evolution 55: 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R.J. & M.E. Newton, 1991. Sex-ratio distortion caused by meiotic drive in mosquitoes. Am. Nat. 137: 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-I., 1983. Virility deficiency and the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura. II. Multiple mating and overall virility selection. Genetics 105: 663–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-I. & M.F. Hammer, 1991. Molecular evolution of ultraselfish genes of meiotic drive systems. pp. 177–203 in Evolution at the Molecular Level, edited by R.K. Selander, A.G. Clark & T.S. Whittam. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    Gerald S. Wilkinson, Sarah J. Christensen & Kevin Madden

  2. Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, USA

    John G. Swallow

Authors
  1. Gerald S. Wilkinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John G. Swallow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah J. Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kevin Madden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkinson, G.S., Swallow, J.G., Christensen, S.J. et al. Phylogeography of Sex Ratio and Multiple Mating in Stalk-Eyed Flies from Southeast Asia. Genetica 117, 37–46 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022360531703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022360531703

Search

Navigation