Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validation of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II Disorders: Does It Meet the Daubert Standard?

  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Relevant to forensic practice, the Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993) established the boundaries for the admissibility of scientific evidence that take into account its trustworthiness as assessed via evidentiary reliability. In conducting forensic evaluations, psychologists and other mental health professionals must be able to offer valid diagnoses, including Axis II disorders. The most widely available measure of personality disorders is the Million Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) and its subsequent revisions (MCMI-II and MCMI-III). We address the critical question, “Do the MCMI-II and MCMI-III meet the requirements of Daubert?” Fundamental problems in the scientific validity and error rates for MCMI-III appear to preclude its admissibility under Daubert for the assessment of Axis II disorders. We address the construct validity for the MCMI and MCMI-II via a meta-analysis of 33 studies. The resulting multitrait-multimethod approach allowed us to address their convergent and discriminant validity through method effects (Marsh, 1990). With reference to Daubert, the results suggest a circumscribed use for the MCMI-II with good evidence of construct validity for Avoidant, Schizotypal, and Borderline personality disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.-rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, J. S. (1984). Validation of two scales for narcissistic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 649–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1991). Multitrait-multimethod matrices in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 426–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, A. L. (1991). An empirical comparison of meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 252–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, R., & Grisso, T. (1995). Psychological test use in criminal forensic evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 465–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1989). Relationships between an additive model and a multiplicative model for multitrait-multimethod matrices. In R. Coppi & S. Bolasco (Eds.), Multiway data analysis (pp. 507–520). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Manual for the administration and scoring of the MMPI-2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., & Goffin, R. D. (1993). Modeling MTMM data from additive and multiplicative covariance structures: An audit of construct validity concordance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, J. D., & Dana, R. H. (1987). Use of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) as a screening instrument at a community mental health center. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 366–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael v. Samyang Tire, Inc., 131 F.3d 1433 (11th Cir. 1997).

  • Chapple v. Ganger, 851 F. Supp. 1481 (E. D. Wash, 1994).

  • Chatham, P. M., Tibbals, C. J., & Harrington, M. E. (1993). The MMPI and the MCMI in the evaluation of narcissism in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chick, D., Sheaffer, C. I., & Goggin, W. C. (1993). The relationship between MCMI personality scales and clinician generated DSM-III-R personality disorder diagnoses. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 264–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. M., & Cowell, D. R. (1993). Relation of birth order and scores on measures of pathological narcissism. Psychological Reports, 72, 311–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993).

  • Davis, S. E., & Hays, L. W. (1997). An examination of the clinical validity of the MCMI-III Depressive Personality Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divac-Jovanovic, M., Svrakic, D., & Lecic-Tosevski, D. (1993). Personality disorders: Model for conceptual approach and classification. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 47, 558–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubro, A. F., & Wetzler, S. (1989). An external validity study of the MMPI personality disorder scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 570–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyce, J. A., O'Connor, B. P., Parkins, S. Y., & Janzen, H. L. (1997). Correlational structure of the MCMI-III personality disorder scales and comparison with other data sets. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 568–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Inc. v. Robinson, 923 S.W..2d 549 (Tex. 1995).

  • Fiske, D. W., & Campbell, D. T. (1992). Citations do not solve problems. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 393–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).

  • General Electric Company v. Joiner, 118 S.Ct. 512 (1997).

  • Gier by and through Gier v. Educational Services Unit, 66 F.3d 940 (8th Cir 1995).

  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (1997). Forensic expertise in the wake of Daubert. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, P. C., & Mobley, B. D. (1994). A comparison of the differential diagnostic efficacy of three personality disorder inventories. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 656–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Dutton, D. G., & Newlove, T. (1993). The prevalence of personality disorder among wife assaulters. Journal of Personality Disorders, 7, 329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Forth, A. E., & Hare, R. D. (1991). The MCMI and psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 5, 318–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, B., Jackson, H. J., Rudd, R. P., & Edwards, J. (1990). Diagnosing personality disorders in recentonset schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 178, 194–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inch, R., & Crossley, M. (1993). Diagnostic utility of the MCMI-I and MCMI-II with psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 358–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, H. J., Gazis, J., Rudd, R. P., & Edwards, J. (1991). Concordance between two personality disorder instruments with psychiatric inpatients. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 32, 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. H., McVey, G., & Katz, R. (1990). Personality disorders in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Psychiatric Research, 24, 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. E. (1994). Assessing aviators for personality pathology with the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, 227–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. J., & Harder, D. W. (1991). A comparison of four measures to diagnose DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder in outpatients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libb, J. W., Stankovic, S., Freeman, A., Sokol, R., Switzer, P., & Houck, C. (1990). Personality disorders among depressed outpatients as identified by the MCMI. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, D. B. (1995). A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 207–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, D. B., Husband, S. D., Bonieskie, L. M., Kirby, K. C., & Platt, O. (1997). Structured interview versus self-report test vantages for the assessment of personality pathology in cocaine dependence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 11, 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1990). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data: The construct validation of multidimensional self-concept responses. Journal of Personality, 58, 661–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J. T. (1989). MMPI personality disorder scales and the MCMI: Concurrent validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 365–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J. T. (1990). A multitrait-multimethod analysis of the MCMI-II clinical syndrome scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J. T. (1991). Convergent and discriminant validity of the MCMI-II and MMPI personality disorder scales. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J. T., & Dyer, F. J. (1996). Forensic assessment with the Millon inventories. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1981). Disorders of personality: DSM-III, Axis II. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1983). The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1987). Manual for the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1994). The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1996). Forward. In J. T. McCann, & F. J. Dyer, Forensic assessment with the Millon inventories (pp. vii–ix). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T., & Davis, R. D. (1997). The MCMI-III: Present and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Tampa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C., & Le Vine, D. J. (1988). A multitrait-multimethod examination of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 10, 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C., Waugh, M. H., & Blashfield, R. K. (1985). MMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorders: A preliminary validation study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazikian, H., Rudd, R. P., Edwards, J., & Jackson, H. J. (1990). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 24, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J. (1993). Validation of the MCMI-I borderline personality disorder scale with a well-defined criterion sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, B., Stangl, D., & Zimmerman, M. (1982). The Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders (SIDP). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piersma, H. L. (1987). The MCMI as a measure of DSM-III Axis II diagnoses: An empirical comparison. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 478–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prifitera, A., & Ryan, J. J. (1984). Validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) in a psychiatric sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 140–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J. E. (1996). Fixed vs. flexible neuropsychological test batteries under the Daubert standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, J., Noyes, R., & Troughton, E. (1987). Dependent personality disorder associated with phobic avoidance in patients with panic disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 323–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renneberg, B., Chambless, D. L., Dowdall, D. J., Fauerbach, J. A., & Gracely, E. J. (1992). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, Axis II and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory: A concurrent validity study of personality disorders among anxious patients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retzlaff, P. (1996). MCMI-III validity: Bad test or bad validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 431–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T., Ginsburg, G. P., Gatowski, S., & Dobbin, S. (1995). The problems of applying Daubert to psychological syndrome evidence. Judicature, 79, 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (1995). Diagnostic and structured interviewing: A handbook for psychologists. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., & Shuman, D. W. (in press). Conducting insanity evaluations (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotgers, F., & Barrett, D. (1996). Daubert v. Merrell Dow and expert testimony by clinical psychologists: Implications and recommendations for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansone, R. A., & Fine, M. A. (1992). Borderline personality as a predictor of outcome in women with eating disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, C. E., Snibbe, J. R., & Buckwalter, J. G. (1994). Validity of the MMPI Personality Disorder scales (MMPI-PD). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 220–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Silberman, C., Roth, L., Segal, D. L., & Burns, W. J. (1997). Relationship between the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II and the Coolidge Axis II Inventory in chemically dependent mentally ill older adults: A pilot study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldz, S., Budman, S., Demby, A., & Merry, J. (1993). Diagnostic agreement between the Personality Disorder Examination and the MCMI-II. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 486–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Gibbon, M. (1987). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • State v. Cavaliere, 663 A.2d 96 (N.H. 1995).

  • S.V. v. R. V., 933 S.W.2d 1 (Tex. 1996).

  • Torgersen, S. & Alnaes, R. (1990). The relationship between the MCMI personality scales and DSM-III, Axis II, Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 698–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. v. Scheffer, 118 S.Ct. 1261 (1998).

  • Wetzler, S., & Dubro, A. (1990). Diagnosis of personality disorders by the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 178, 261–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., & Sanderson, C. (1987). The convergent and discriminant validity of the MCMI as a measure of the DSM-III personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., Williams, J., Spitzer, R. L., & Frances, A. (1985). The MCMI as a measure of DSM-III. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 366–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, M., & Gorman, J. L. (1995). Correspondence between student scores on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II and Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire—Revised. Psychological Reports, 77, 1079–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, E. G. (1994). Managed care and the psychometric validity of the MMPI and MCMI personality disorder scales. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 13, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, E. G. (1996). Comparative validity of MMPI-2 and MCMI-II personality disorder classifications. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 569–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarrella, K. L., Schuerger, J. M., & Ritz, G. H. (1990). Estimation of MCMI DSM-III Axis II constructs from MMPI scales and subscales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonana, H. (1994). Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: A new standard for scientific evidence in the courts? Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22, 309–325.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, 76203-1280

    Richard Rogers & Kenneth W. Sewell

  2. Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, 33199

    Randall T. Salekin

Authors
  1. Richard Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Randall T. Salekin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenneth W. Sewell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, R., Salekin, R.T. & Sewell, K.W. Validation of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II Disorders: Does It Meet the Daubert Standard?. Law Hum Behav 23, 425–443 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022360031491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022360031491

Keywords

Search

Navigation