Law and Human Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 517–537 | Cite as

The Nature of Real, Implanted, and Fabricated Memories for Emotional Childhood Events: Implications for the Recovered Memory Debate

  • Stephen Porter
  • John C. Yuille
  • Darrin R. Lehman
Article

Abstract

A central issue in the recovered memory debate is whether it is possible to “remember” a highly emotional incident which never occurred. The present study provided an in-depth investigation of real, implanted, and fabricated (deceptive) memories for stressful childhood events. We examined whether false memories for emotional events could be implanted and, if so, whether real, implanted, and fabricated memories had distinctive features. A questionnaire was sent to participants' parents asking about six highly emotional, stressful events (e.g., serious animal attack) which the participant may have experienced in childhood. Next, across three sessions, interviewers encouraged participants (N = 77) to “recover” a memory for a false event using guided imagery and repeated retrieval attempts. In the first interview, they were asked about one real and one false event, both introduced as true according to their parents. In two subsequent interviews, they were reinterviewed about the false event. Finally, after the third inquiry about the false event, participants were asked to fabricate a memory report. Results indicated that 26% of participants “recovered” a complete memory for the false experience and another 30% recalled aspects of the false experience. Real, implanted, and fabricated memories differed on several dimensions (e.g., confidence, vividness, details, repeated details, coherence, stress). These findings have important implications for the debate over recovered and false memories.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychological Association. (1996). Working Group on Investigation of Memories of Childhood Abuse final report. Washington, DC. Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bass, E., & Davis, L. (1988). The courage to heal: A guide for women survivors of child sexual abuse. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  3. Berliner, L., & McDougall, J. (1997). Agenda for research: Clinical approaches to recollections of trauma. In J. D. Read & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Recollections of trauma: Scientific evidence and clinical practice (pp. 523–530). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, D., Scheflin, A. W., & Hammond, D. C. (1998). Memory, trauma treatment, and the law. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Courtois, C. A. (1997). Informed clinical practice and the standard of care: Proposed guidelines for the treatment of adults who report delayed memories of childhood trauma. In J. D. Read & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Recollections of trauma: Scientific evidence and clinical practice (pp. 337–370). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  7. Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Freud, S. (1922). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. Horowitz, S. W. (1991). Empirical support for Statement Validity Analysis. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 293–313.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, E. (1929). Cartesianische Meditationen. The Hague: Nihoff.Google Scholar
  12. Hyman, I. E., & Billings F. J. (1998). Individual differences and the creation of false childhood memories. Memory, 6, 1–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyman, I. E., Husband, T. H., & Billings, J. F. (1995). False memories of childhood experiences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 181–197.Google Scholar
  14. Hyman, I. E., & Pentland, J. (1996). The role of mental imagery in the creation of false memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jane Doe et al. v. Joseph Maskell et al. (1996). No. 102 Court of Appeals (Maryland 29).Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: An experimental approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 390–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 67–85.Google Scholar
  18. Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The animal psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125–128.Google Scholar
  19. Knapp, S. J., & Vandecreek, L. (1997). Treating patients with memories of abuse: Legal risk management. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  20. Kohnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Hofer, E. (1995). The Cognitive Interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults' statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Landry, K., & Brigham, J. (1992). The effect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663–676.Google Scholar
  22. Lindsay, D. S., & Read, J. D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 281–338.Google Scholar
  23. Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518–537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Loftus, E. F. (1997a). Creating false memories. Scientific American, 277, 70–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Loftus, E. F. (1997b). Dispatch from the (un)civil memory wars. In J. D. Read & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Recollections of trauma: Scientific evidence and clinical practice (pp. 171–198). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  26. Loftus, E. F. (1997c). Memory for a past that never was. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loftus, E. F., Coan, J. A., & Pickrell, J. E. (1996). Manufacturing false memories using bits of reality. In L. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 195–220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Loftus, E. F., & Pickrell, J. E. (1995). The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals, 25, 720–725.Google Scholar
  29. Lynn, S. J., Lock, T. G., Myers, B., & Payne, D. G. (1997). Recalling the unrecallable: Should hypnosis be used to recover memories in psychotherapy? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marxsen, D., Yuille, J. C., & Nisbet, M. (1995). The complexities of eliciting and assessing children's statements. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 450–460.Google Scholar
  31. McCann, J. T. (1998). Malingering and deception in adolescents: Assessing credibility in clinical and forensic settings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  32. Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1998). Credibility assessment: Psychology and the law. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Olio, K. A. (1989). Memory retrieval in the treatment of adult survivors of sexual abuse. Transactional Analysis Journal, 19, 93–100.Google Scholar
  34. Payne, D. G., Neuschatz, J. S., Lampinen, J. M., & Lynn, S. J. (1997). Compelling memory illusions: The qualitative characteristics of false memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pezdek, K., Finger, K., & Hodge, D. (1997). Planting false childhood memories: The role of event plausibility. Psychological Science, 8, 437–441.Google Scholar
  36. Pezdek, K., & Roe, C. (1997). The suggestibility of children's memory for being touched: Planting, erasing, and changing memories. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 95–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Poole, D. A., Lindsay, D. S., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1995). Psychotherapy and the recovery of memories of childhood sexual abuse: U.S. and British practitioners' opinions, practices, and experiences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 426–437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pope, K. S. (1996). Memory, abuse, and science: Questioning claims about the false memory syndrome epidemic. American Psychologist, 51, 957–974.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Porter, S. (1998). An architectural mind: The nature of real, created, and fabricated memories of emotional childhood events. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  40. Porter, S., & Marxsen, D. (1998). Challenging the eyewitness expert: An update considering memory for trauma and false memories. In J. Ziskin (Ed.), 1997 Supplement to coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony (5th ed., pp. 112–129). Los Angeles: Law and Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1995). Credibility assessment of criminal suspects through statement analysis. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 1, 319–331.Google Scholar
  42. Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443–458.Google Scholar
  43. Porter, S., Yuille, J. C., & Bent, A. (1995). A comparison of the eyewitness accounts of deaf and hearing children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 51–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pynoos, R., & Nader, K. (1989). Children's memory and proximity to violence. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 236–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. R. v. Francois (1994). 2 S.C.R. 827.Google Scholar
  46. Raskin, D. C., & Esplin, P. W. (1991). Assessment of children's statements of sexual abuse. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 153–164). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  47. Read, J. D., & Lindsay, D. S. (1997). Preface. In R. D. Read & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Recollections of trauma: Scientific evidence and clinical practice (pp. v–vi). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  48. Rogers, R. (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  49. Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1997). The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations: A critical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 705–737.Google Scholar
  50. Schacter, D. L. (Ed.). (1995). Momory distortion: How minds, brains, and societies reconstruct the past. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  52. Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 171–181.Google Scholar
  53. Schooler, J. W., & Hyman, I. E. (1997). Veridical and non-veridical memories of trauma. In J. D. Read & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Recollections of trauma: Scientific evidence and clinical practice (pp. 531–540). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  54. Spanos, N. (1996). Multiple identities and false memories. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  55. Spanos, N., Menary, E., Gabora, N., DuBreuil, S., & Dewhirst, B. (1991). Secondary identity enactments during hypnotic past-life regression: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 308–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wagenaar, W. A., & Groeneweg, J. (1990). The memory of concentration camp survivors. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 77–87.Google Scholar
  57. Williams, L. M. (1994). Recall of childhood trauma: A prospective study of women's memories of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 1167–1176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Yuille, J. C., & Daylen, J. (1998). The impact of trauma on eyewitness memory. In C. P. Thompson, D. J. Herrmann, J. D. Read, D. Bruce, D. G. Payne, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 155–178. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Yuille, J.C., Hunter, R., Joffe, R., & Zaparniuk, J. (1993). Interviewing children in sexual abuse cases. In G. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving children's testimony: Clinical, developmental, and legal implications (pp. 95–115). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  60. Yuille, J. C., Tymofievich, M., & Marxsen, D. (1995). The nature of allegations of child sexual abuse. In T. Ney (Ed.), Allegations of child sexual abuse: Assessment and case management. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  61. Zaparniuk, J., Yuille, J. C., & Taylor, S. (1995). Assessing the credibility of true and false statements. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18, 343–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Zaragoza, M. S., & Mitchell, K. J. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories. Psychological Science, 7, 294–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Porter
    • 1
  • John C. Yuille
    • 2
  • Darrin R. Lehman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations