Skip to main content
Log in

On the Order of Convergence of a Determinantal Family of Root-Finding Methods

  • Published:
BIT Numerical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, we have shown that for each natural number m greater than one, and each natural number k less than or equal to m, there exists a root-finding iteration function, defined as the ratio of two determinants that depend on the first m - k derivatives of the given function. For each k the corresponding matrices are upper Hessenberg matrices. Additionally, for k = 1 these matrices are Toeplitz matrices. The goal of this paper is to analyze the order of convergence of this fundamental family. Newton's method, Halley's method, and their multi-point versions are members of this family. In this paper we also derive these special cases. We prove that for fixed m, as k increases, the order of convergence decreases from m to the positive root of the characteristic polynomial of generalized Fibonacci numbers of order m. For fixed k, the order of convergence increases in m. The asymptotic error constant is also derived in terms of special determinants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. G. Alefeld, On the convergence of Halley's Method, Amer. Math. Monthly, 88 (1981), pp. 530-536.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. E. Atkinson, An Introduction to Numerical Analysis, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, NY, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Bateman, Halley's method for solving equations, Amer. Math. Monthly, 45 (1938), pp. 11-17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. E. Bergum, A. N. Philippou, and A. F. Hordam, Applications of Fibonacci Numbers, vol. 5, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Bodewig, On types of convergence and on the behavior of approximations in the neighborhood of a multiple root of an equation, Quart. Appl. Math., 7 (1949), pp. 325-333.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. H. Brown, Jr., On Halley's variation of Newton's method, Amer. Math. Monthly, 84 (1977), pp. 726-728.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Davies, and B. Dawson, On the global convergence of Halley's iteration formula, Numer. Math., 24 (1975), pp. 133-135.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Feinberg, Fibonacci-Tribonacci, Fibonacci Quarterly, 1 (1963), pp. 71-74.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. F. Ford, and J. A. Pennline, Accelerated convergence in Newton's method, SIAM Review, 38 (1996), pp. 658-659.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. S. Frame, The solution of equations by continued fraction, Amer. Math. Monthly, 60 (1953), pp. 293-305.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Gander, On Halley's iteration method, Amer. Math. Monthly, 92 (1985), pp. 131-134.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Gerlach, Accelerated convergence in Newton's method, SIAM Review, 36 (1994), pp. 272-276.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Golub and C. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, 3rd ed., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Halley, A new, exact, and easy method of finding roots of any equations generally, and that without any previous reduction, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 18 (1694), pp. 136-145.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. J. Hamilton, A type of variation of Newton's method, Amer. Math. Monthly, 57 (1950), pp. 517-522.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Hansen, and M. Patrick, A family of root finding methods, Numer. Math., 27 (1977), pp. 257-269.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Henrici, Applied and Computational Complex Analysis, vol. I, Wiley, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. S. Householder, The Numerical Treatment of a Single Nonlinear Equation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Kalantari, and I. Kalantari, High order iterative methods for approximating square roots, BIT, 36 (1996), pp. 395-399.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Kalantari, I. Kalantari, and R. Zaare-Nahandi, A basic family of iteration functions for polynomial root finding and its characterizations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 80 (1997), pp. 209-226.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Kalantari, Generalization of Taylor's theorem and Newton's method via a new family of determinantal interpolation formulas, Technical Report DCS-TR 328, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. P. Miles, Generalized Fibonacci numbers and associated matrices, Amer. Math. Monthly, 6 (1960), pp. 745-757.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. M. Ostrowski, Solution of Equations and System of Equations, 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Y. Pan, Solving a polynomial equation: some history and recent progress, SIAM Review, 39 (1997), pp. 187-220.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. B. Popovski, A family of one-point iteration formulae for finding roots, Internat. J. Computer Math., 8 (1980), pp. 85-88.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. R. Scavo, and J. B. Thoo, On the geometry of Halley's method, Amer. Math. Monthly, 102 (1995), pp. 417-426.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Shub and S. Smale, On the geometry of polynomials and a theory of cost: Part I, Ann. Scient. Ec. Norm. Sup., 18 (1985), pp. 107-142.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Smale, Newton's method estimates from data at one point, in The Merging of Disciplines: New Directions in Pure, Applied, and Computational Mathematics, R. E. Ewing, K. I. Gross, C. F. Martin, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986, pp. 185-196.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. W. Snyder, One more correction formula, Amer. Math. Monthly, 62 (1955), pp. 722-725.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. K. Stewart, Another variation of Newton's method, Amer. Math. Monthly, 58 (1951), pp. 331-334.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. F. Traub, Iterative Methods for the Solution of Equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. F. Traub, A class of globally convergent iteration functions for the solution of polynomial equations, Math. Comp., 20 (1966), pp. 113-138.

    Google Scholar 

  33. H. S. Wall, A modification of Newton's method, Amer. Math. Monthly, 55 (1948), pp. 90-94.

    Google Scholar 

  34. T. J. Ypma, Historical development of Newton-Raphson method, SIAM Review, 37 (1995), pp. 531-551.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalantari, B. On the Order of Convergence of a Determinantal Family of Root-Finding Methods. BIT Numerical Mathematics 39, 96–109 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022321325108

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022321325108

Navigation