Abstract
In this paper, technology is described as involving processes whereby resources are utilised to satisfy human needs or to take advantage of opportunities, to develop practical solutions to problems. This study, set within one type of technology context, information technology, investigated how, through a one semester undergraduate university course, elements of technological processes were made explicit to students. While it was acknowledged in the development and implementation of this course that students needed to learn technical skills, technological skills and knowledge, including design, were seen as vital also, to enable students to think about information technology from a perspective that was not confined and limited to `technology as hardware and software'. This paper describes how the course, set within a three year program of study, was aimed at helping students to develop their thinking and their knowledge about design processes in an explicit way. An interpretive research approach was used and data sources included a repertory grid `survey'; student interviews; video recordings of classroom interactions, audio recordings of lectures, observations of classroom interactions made by researchers; and artefacts which included students' journals and portfolios. The development of students' knowledge about design practices is discussed and reflections upon student knowledge development in conjunction with their learning experiences are made. Implications for ensuring explicitness of design practice within information technology contexts are presented, and the need to identify what constitutes design knowledge is argued.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Christiaans, H. & Dorst, K.: 1992, 'An Empirical Study into Design Thinking', in N. Cross & K. Dorst & N. Roozenburg (eds.), Research in Design Thinking, Delft University Press, Delft, The Netherlands, 119–125.
Custer, R. L.: 1995, 'Examining the Dimensions of Technology', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5, 219–244.
Crismond, D.: 2001, 'Learning and Using Science Ideas When Doing Investigate-and-Redesign Tasks: A Study of Naïve, Novice, and Expert Designers Doing Constrained and Scaffolded Design Work', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(7), 791–820.
Eckersley, M.: 1988, 'The Form of Design Processes: A Protocol Analysis Study', Design Studies 9(2), 86–94.
Erickson, F.: 1998, 'Qualitative Research Methods for Science Education', in B. J. Fraser & K. G Tobin (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education(Part 2), Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, 1155–1173.
Faulkner, W.: 1994, 'Conceptualizing Knowledge Used in Innovation: A Second Look at the Science-Technology Distinction and Industrial Innovation', Science, Technology, and Human Values 19(4), 425–458.
Fordyce, D.: 1992, 'The Nature of Student Learning in Engineering', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2(3), 22–40.
Gardner, P. L., Penna, C. & Brass, K.: 1996, 'Technology Education in the Post-Compulsory Years', in P. J. Fensham (ed.), Science and Technology Education in the Post-Compulsory Years, Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, 140–192.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S.: 1989, Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
Ginns, I., Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J. & Swales, A.: 2000, 'A Case Study of a Gifted Female Primary School Student Grappling with a Design and Technology Project', The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education 9(2), 43–54.
Jones, A.: 1997, 'Recent Research in Learning Technological Concepts and Processes', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7, 83–96.
Jones, J. C.: 1992, Design Methods, 2nd ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Kuhn, S.: 2001, 'Learning from the Architectural Studio: Implications for Project-Based Pedagogy', International Journal of Engineering Education 17(4-5), 349–352.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E.: 1991, Situated Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lee, Y. S. & Vakoch, D. A.: 1996, 'Transfer and Retention of Implicit and Explicit Learning', British Journal of Psychology 87(4), 637–651.
Lewis, T. & Gagel, C.: 1992, 'Technological Literacy: A Critical Analysis', Journal of Curriculum Studies 24(2), 117–138.
Marton, F. & Pang, M.: 1999, August, Two Faces of Variation', paper presented at the 8th European conference for learning and instruction, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
McCormick, R.: 1997, 'Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7, 141–159.
McCormick, R. & Davidson, M.: 1996, 'Problem Solving and the Tyranny of Product Outcomes', The Journal of Design and Technology Education 1(3), 230–241.
McRobbie, C. J., Ginns, I. & Stein, S. J.: 2000, 'Preservice Primary Teachers' Thinking About Technology and Technology Education,' International Journal of Technology and Design Education 10(1), 81–101.
McRobbie, C. J., Stein, S. J. & Ginns, I. S.: 2001, 'Exploring Designerly Thinking of Preservice Teacher Education Students as Novice Designers', Research in Science Education 31, 91–116.
Middleton, H.: 2000, December, 'Designing Research to Research Design: Some Methodological Issues in Researching Design Thinking', paper presented at the 1st Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Mumford, L.: 1972, 'Technics and the Nature of Man', in C. Mitcham & R. Mackey (eds.), Philosophy and Technology, The Free Press, New York, 77–85.
özcan, O. & Akarun, L.: 2002, 'Teaching Interactive Media Design', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 19, 161–171.
Oxman, R.: 1999, 'Educating the Designerly Thinker', Design Studies 20(2), 105–122.
Prawat, R. S.: 1996, 'Learning Community, Commitment and School Reform', Journal of Curriculum Studies 28(1), 91–110.
Queensland School Curriculum Council (QSCC): 2002, Technology: Years 1-10 Syllabus, Queensland School Curriculum Council, The State of Queensland, Brisbane.
Raizen, S. A., Sellwood, P., Tod, R. D. & Vickers, M.: 1995, Technology Education in the Classroom, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Roth, W.-M.: 1998, Designing Communities, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Schön, D.: 1987, Educating the Reflective Practitioner, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Shapiro, B. L.: 1996, 'A Case Study of Change in Elementary Student Teacher Thinking During an Independent Investigation in Science: Learning About the "Face of Science That Does Not Yet Know"', Science Education 5, 535–560.
Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J. & Ginns, I.: 2000, 'Recognising the Uniqueness in the Technology Key Learning Area: The Search for Meaning', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 10(2), 105–123.
Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J. & Ginns, I. S.: 2001, 'Authentic Program Planning in Technology Education', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11(3), 239–261.
Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J. & Ginns, I. S.: 2002, 'Capitalising on Opportunities for Learning and Assessment in Technology Education', Teaching and Teacher Education 18(1), 35–49.
Travers, K.: 1993, December, 'Design, the Basis of Engineering or Just Another Subject?', paper presented at the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Auckland.
Winograd, T., Bennett, J., De Young, L. & Hartfield, B. (eds.): 1996, Bringing Design to Software, ACM Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stein, S.J., Docherty, M. & Hannam, R. Making the Processes of Designing Explicit Within an Information Technology Environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13, 145–170 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022312323398
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022312323398