Abstract
The goal of the current investigation was to determine how jurors may be influenced by elderly victim/witnesses. Stereotypes of elderly victim/witnesses were hypothesized to differentially impact jurors' perceptions and decisions. Participants (255 college and 229 community members who were jury-eligible) read a trial summary describing the aggravated assault of a man. The described case hinged on the victim's eyewitness identification of the defendant. The description of the victims was varied in order to examine five types of victim/witnesses: (1) a generic adult victim, described as being 31 years of age, (2) a generic elderly witness, described as being 66 years of age, (3) a 66-year-old senior citizen described to elicit the vulnerable-senior stereotype, (4) a 66-year-old grandfather, and (5) a 66-year-old statesman. Contrary to expectations, no significant differences were found between the college and community samples. Further, ratings of the victims' believability did not vary as a function of the different victim types. However, verdict differences were found for the different victim types. The proportion of guilty verdicts awarded in the statesman condition was significantly higher than those awarded when the victim was a generic adult, senior citizen, or grandfather. A significant difference was also found between the vulnerable senior citizen and the generic elderly case, with the generic elderly victim receiving a greater proportion of guilty verdicts than the vulnerable senior citizen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Berman, G. L., & Cutler, B. L. (1996). Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 170–177.
Brewer, M. B., Dull, V., & Lui, L. (1981). Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 656–670.
Brewer, M. B., & Lui, L. (1984). Categorization of the elderly by the elderly. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 585–595.
Brimacombe, C. A. E., & Garrioch, L. (1996, March). Jurors' evaluations of seniors' testimonies. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Hilton Head, South Carolina.
Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgments. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 547–562.
Clark, H. L., & Nightingale, N. N. (1997). When jurors consider recovered memory cases: Effects of victim and juror gender. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 25, 87–104.
Cutler, B. L., Dexter, H. R., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 215–225.
Crockett, W. H., Press, A. N., & Osterkamp, M. (1979). The effect of deviations from stereotyped expectations upon attitudes toward older persons. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 368–374.
Duggan III, L. M., Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sex abuse trial. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on the child witness (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., & Haith, M. M. (1984). Jurors? reactions to child witnesses. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 139–156.
Goodman, J., Elicit, E. F., Miller, M., & Greene, E. (1991). Gender bias in wrongful death damage awards. Special Issue: Gender and sociolegal studies. Law and Society Review, 25, 263–285.
Hummert, M. L. (1990). Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: A comparison of structure and evaluations. Psychology and Aging, 5, 182–193.
Hummert, M. L., Garstke, T. A., Shaner, J. L. & Strahm, S. (1995). Judgements about the stereotypes of the elderly. Research on Aging, 17, 168–189.
Leippe, M. R. (1994). The appraisal of eyewitness testimony. In D. Ross, D. Read, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current directions and developments (pp. 385–418). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 103–131.
MacCoun, R. J. (1990). The emergence of extralegal bias during jury deliberation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 303–314.
McCall, T., Dancer, J., Drummond, S., & Gentry, B. (1993). Listeners' perceptions of older versus younger adult speech: Implications for professionals and families. Educational Gerontology, 19, 503–509.
Nightingale, N. N. (1993). Jurors' reactions to child victim witnesses: Factors affecting trial outcome. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 679–694.
Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990) The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 5–23.
Schmidt, D. F., & Boland, S. M. (1986). Structure of perceptions of older adults: Evidence for multiple stereotypes. Psychology and Aging, 3, 255–260.
Yarmey, A. D. (1984). Accuracy and credibility of elderly witnesses. Canadian Journal on Aging, 3, 79–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Nunez, N., McCoy, M.L., Clark, H.L. et al. The Testimony of Elderly Victim/Witnesses and Their Impact on Juror Decisions: The Importance of Examining Multiple Stereotypes. Law Hum Behav 23, 413–423 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022308014652
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022308014652