Skip to main content
Log in

A Mixed Bag: The Realities of Psychoanalytic Practice

  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Abstract

For a variety of reasons, psychoanalytic training is done in somewhat of a vacuum. It teaches a theory and a way of practicing that does not always translate well to day-to-day private practice work. The clinical realities of psychoanalytic practice prove the psychoanalytic method to be one that provides help to a wider audience than classical psychoanalytic training programs might suggest. The psychoanalytic approach offers the analyst many special opportunities to work with and help a wide variety of patients. Analysts who accept both the limitations as well as the wide application and broad benefits of the psychoanalytic approach may have a more fulfilling experience than their training experiences might foster. At the same time, the analyst's level of therapeutic skill, the patient's diagnosis, and many multiple external factors create different limitations in the practice and outcome of psychoanalytic work. Extensive case material is used to show the broad range of patients who are helped by the psychoanalytic method. The clinical material also shows the less than perfect, but often good enough outcomes of these difficult cases with often severely disturbed patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Caper, C. (1992). Does psychoanalysis heal? A contribution to the theory of psychoanalytic technique. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessick, R. (1997). Psychoanalytic treatment of the borderline patient. J. Amer. Academy of Psychoanalysis, 25(1), 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, J. B. (1979). An approach to the study of analyzability and analysis: The course of forty consecutive cases selected for supervised analysis, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 48, 198–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R., Bucci, W., Christopher, C., Drucker, P., et al. (1998). Private psychotherapy patients of psychiatrist psychoanalysts. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(12), 1772–1774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, E. (1955). The technique of psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. 1935. A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic-depressive states. The writings of Melanie Klein, Vol. 1. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. 1946. Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. The Writings of Melanie Klein, Vol. 3. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, J. (1988). The timing of termination. Int. Review of Psychoanalysis, 15, 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, A. (1994). A perspective on doing a consultation and making the recommendation of analysis to a prospective analysand. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 63(4), 680–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waska, R. (2000). The ideal patient and the realities of clinical work. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 30(4), 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Waska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waska, R. A Mixed Bag: The Realities of Psychoanalytic Practice. Am J Psychoanal 63, 49–67 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022306521549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022306521549

Navigation