Abstract
The issue of how “forensic psychology” is defined has taken on a new urgency in the context of an application to have forensic psychology designated a “specialty” by the American Psychological Association. To provide a historical perspective, I briefly review early attempts to apply psychological concepts to legal issues, beginning with the McNaughten trial in England in 1843. I then review current conceptualizations of forensic psychology, which have either a broad focus on all psychology–law interactions or focus more narrowly on clinical applications to the legal system. Potential advantages and disadvantages of each conceptualization are briefly discussed. After touching upon the major differences in the “cultures” of psychology and of law, I discuss three law-related areas of contemporary controversy: use of clinically based evidence in the courtroom, “recovered” memories of child abuse, and the use of the criteria-based content analysis technique to evaluate children's claims of sexual abuse. Issues concerning the education and training of psychology–law scholars and practitioners are briefly surveyed. I conclude that a broad conceptualization of forensic psychology is important in terms of relevant ethical standards, but that a more narrow distinction that differentiates between clinicians and researchers or legal scholars also is useful.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Allport, F. H., et al. (1953). The effects of segregation and the consequences of desegregation: A social science statement. Minnesota Law Review, 37, 429-440.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Anson, D. A., Golding, S. L., & Gully, K. J. (1993). Child sexual abuse allegations: Reliability of criteria-based content analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 331-341.
APA Working Group on Investigation of Memories of Childhood Abuse (1996). Final report. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Baldwin, M., & Watts, B. (1996). A survey of graduate education and training experiences in psychology and law. American Psychology Law Society News, 16, 10-11.
Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (1987). History of forensic psychology. In I. B. Weiner & A. Hess (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 3-21). New York: Wiley.
Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (1994). Psychology and law: Research and application (2nd Ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Bass, E., & Davis, L. (1988), Courage to heal: A guide for women survivors of child sexual abuse. New York: Harper and Row.
Berliner, L., & Conte, J. R. (1993). Sexual abuse evaluations: Conceptual and empirical obstacles. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 111-125.
Bersoff, D. N. (1986). Psychologists and the legal system: Broader perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 151-165.
Bersoff, D. N. (1987). Social science data and the Supreme Court: Lockhart as a case in point. American Psychologist, 42, 52-58.
Bersoff, D. N. (in press). Preparing for two cultures: Education and training in law and psychology. In R. Roesch & S. D. Hart (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline. New York: Plenum.
Bersoff, D. N., Goodman-Delahunty, J., Grisso, J. T., Hans, V. P., Poythress, N. G. Jr., & Roesch, R. G. (1997). Training in law and psychology: Models from the Villanova Conference. American Psychologist, 52, 1301-1310.
Brown, D., Scheflin, A., & Hammond, D. (1998). Memory, trauma treatment and the law. New York: Norton.
Brown v. Board of Education, 375 U.S. 483 (1954).
Ceci, S. J., Huffman, M. L., Smith, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Repeatedly thinking about a non-event. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 388-407.
Ceci, S. J., Loftus, E. F., Leichtman, M. D., & Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 304-320.
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655-665.
Cook, S. W. (1978). Interpersonal and attitudinal outcomes in cooperating interracial groups. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 97-113.
Cook, S. W. (1984). The 1954 Social Science Statement and school desegregation: A reply to Gerard. American Psychologist, 39, 819-832.
Cook, S. W. (1985). Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation. American Psychologist, 40, 452-460.
Courtois, C. A. (1997). Guidelines for the treatment of adults abused or possibly abused as children. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51, 497-510.
Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: Free Press.
Enns, C. Z., Campbell, J., Courtois, C. A., Gottlieb, M. C., Lese, K. P., Gilbert, M. S., & Forrest, L. (1998). Working with adult clients who may have experienced childhood abuse: Recommendations for assessment and practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 245-256.
Finkel, N. J. (1988). Insanity on trial. New York: Plenum.
Fivush, R., & Shukat, J. (1995). Content, consistency and coherence of early autobiographical recall. In M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds.), Memory and the child witness (pp. 5-23). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Foley, L. A. (1993). A psychological view of the legal system. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
Freud, S. (1906/1959). Psycho-analysis and the establishment of the facts in legal proceedings. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 9 (pp. 103-114). London: Hogarth.
Fulero, S. (1997). Babies bathwater, and being “hoisted by own petard.” National Psychologist, 6, 10-11.
Geiselman, R. E., & Padilla, J. (1988). Interviewing child witnesses with the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16, 236-242.
Gerard, H. B. (1983). School desegregation: The social science role. American Psychologist, 38, 869-877.
Grisso, T., & Saks, M. J. (1991). Psychology's influence on constitutional interpretation: A comment on how to succeed. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 205-211.
Hafemeister, T. L., & Melton, G. B. (1987). The impact of social science research on the judiciary. In G. B. Melton (Ed.), Reforming the law: Impact of child development research (pp. 27-62). New York: Guilford.
Hagen, M. A. (1997). Whores of the court. New York: HarperCollins.
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Haney, C. (1980). Psychology and legal change: On the limits of a factual jurisprudence. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 371-398.
Hawthorne v. Florida, 470 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App., 1985).
Heilbrun, K. (1998). Law and psychology, forensic psychology, and definitions. Unpublished paper, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In N. Macrae, M. Hewstone, & C. Stangor (Eds.), Foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323-368). New York: Guilford.
Honts, C. R. (1994). Assessing children's credibility: Scientific and legal issues in 1994. North Dakota Law Review, 70, 879-903.
Horowitz, I. A., Willging, T. E., & Bordens, K. S. (1998). Psychology of law: Integrations and applications (2nd ed). New York: Longman.
International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (1998). Childhood trauma remembered: A report on the current scientific knowledge base and its applications. Northbrook, IL: ISTSS.
Jackson, J. H., Jr. (1998). Creating a consensus: Psychologists, the Supreme Court, and school desegregation, 1952–1955. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 143-177.
Kalven, H. (1958). Some comments on the Law and Behavioral Science Project at the University of Pennsylvania. Journal of Legal Education, 11, 94-99.
Kassin, S. M. (1997). Clinical psychology in court: House of junk science? Contemporary Psychology, 43, 321-324.
Kim, Y. Y., & Gudykunst, W. G. (Eds.) (1988). Theories of intercultural communications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Koehnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Hofer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults' statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671-684.
Kuna, D. P. (1978). One-sided portrayal of Munsterberg. American Psychologist, 33, 700.
Landry, K. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1992). The effect of training in criteria-based content analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663-676.
Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 (1986).
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).
Melton, G. B. (1987). Training in psychology and law. In I. B. Weiner & A. Hess (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 681-697). New York: Wiley.
Melton, G. B. (1992). The law is a good thing (psychology is, too). Law and Human Behavior, 16, 381-398.
Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1988). Science in law: A new paradigm. American Psychologist, 43, 465-472.
Moran, R. (1981). Knowing right from wrong: The insanity defense of Daniel McNaughten. New York: Free Press.
Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908).
Munsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
New Jersey v. Kelly, 97 N.J., 478 A. 2d 364 (1984).
Ogloff, J. R. P., & Finkelman, D. (in press). Psychology and law: An overview. In R. Roesch & S. D. Hart (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline. New York: Plenum.
Ogloff, J. R. P., Tomkins, A. J., & Bersoff, D. N. (1996). Education and training in psychology and law/criminal justice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 200-235.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1986). The contact hypothesis revisited. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 169-195). Oxford: Blackwell.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (1995). Interviewing preschoolers: Effects of nonsuggestive techniques, parental coaching, and leading questions on reports of nonexperienced events. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 129-154.
Raskin, D. C., & Esplin, P. W. (1991a). Assessment of children's statements of sexual abuse. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 153-164). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Raskin, D. C., & Esplin, P. W. (1991b). Statement validity assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children's statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 265-291.
Rock v. Arkansas, 107 S. Ct. 2704, 97 L. Ed. 2d 37, 1987.
Roesch, R. (in press). Forensic psychology. In R. Roesch & S. D. Hart (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline. New York: Plenum.
Roesch, R., Grisso, T., & Poythress, N. G. Jr. (1986). Training programs, courses, and workshops in psychology and law. In M. F. Kaplan (Ed.), The impact of social psychology on procedural justice (pp. 83-108). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1997). The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations: A critical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 705-737.
Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1998). Can criteria-based content analysis distinguish between true and false statements of African American speakers? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 369-388.
Saks, M. J. (1986). The law does not live by eyewitness testimony alone. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 279-280.
Saks, M. J. (1989). Legal policy analysis and evaluation. American Psychologist, 44, 1110-1117.
Steller, M., & Wellershaus, P. (1995). Information enhancement and credibility assessment of child statements: The impact of the cognitive interview technique on criteria-based content analysis. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran, & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (pp. 118-126). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Stephan, W. G. (1978). School desegregation: An evaluation of predictions made in Brown v. Board of Education. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 217-238.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Integroup interaction anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157-177.
Tomkins, A. J., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1990). Training and career options in psychology and law. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 205-216.
Tomkins, A. J., & Oursland, K. (1991). Social and social scientific perspectives in judicial interpretations of the Constitution: A historical view and an overview. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 101-120.
Thompson, W. C. (1989). Death qualification: After Wainright v. Witt and Lockhart v. McCree. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 185-215.
Tremper, C. R. (1987). Organized psychology's efforts to influence judicial policy-making. American Psychologist, 42, 496-501.
Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 27-56). Stockholm: Norstedt.
Wasby, S. L. (1980). History and state of the art of applied social research in the courts. In M. J. Saks & C. H. Baron (Eds.), The use/nonuse/misuse of applied social research in the courts (pp. 15-18). Cambridge, MA: Abt.
Wexler, D. B. (1990). Training in law and behavioral sciences: Issues from a legal educator's perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 197-204.
Wexler, D. B. (1995). Reflections on the scope of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 220-236.
Wigmore, J. H. (1909). Professor Munsterberg and the psychology of testimony. Illinois Law Review, 3, 399-434.
Winslow, F. (1843/1983). The plea of insanity in criminal cases. New York: Da Capo.
Wrightsman, L. S., Nietzel, M. T., & Fortune, W. H. (1998). Psychology and the legal system (4th Ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Yuille, J. C. (1990). Use of criteria-based content analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Zaparnik, J., Yuille, J. C., & Taylor, S. (1995). Assessing the credibility of true and false statements. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18, 343-352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Brigham, J.C. What Is Forensic Psychology, Anyway?. Law Hum Behav 23, 273–298 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022304414537
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022304414537