Abstract
The degree of utilization of the static exchange capacity of KU-2×8×12 cation exchanger with respect to copper(II), nickel(II), and iron(III) cations was considered as a function of the solution flow velocity through the column cross section.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Rieman, W. and Walton, H.F., Ion-Exchange Chromatography in Analytical Chemistry, New York: Pergamon, 1970.
Ionoobmennye vysokomolekulyarnye soedineniya (Macromolecular Ion Exchangers), Saldadze, K.M., Ed., Moscow: Goskhimizdat, 1960.
Chen Jia-Ming and Chang Fang-Ching, Sep. Sci. Technol., 2000, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1099-1116.
Charlot, G., Les methods de la chimie analytique. Analyse quantitayive minerale, Paris: Masson, 1961, 4th ed.
Cotton, F.A. and Wilkinson, G., Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, New York: Interscience, 1966.
Flynn, C.M., Chem. Rev., 1984, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 31-41.
Peshkova, V.M. and Savostina, V.M., Analiticheskaya khimiya elementov: Nikel' (Analytical Chemistry of Elements: Nickel), Moscow: Nauka, 1966.
Podchainova, V.N. and Simonova, L.N., Analiticheskaya khimiya elementov: Med' (Analytical Chemistry of Elements: Copper), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pechenyuk, S.I., Kondakova, A.A. & Kashulina, T.G. Dynamics of Copper(II), Nickel(II), and Iron(III) Ion Exchange. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry 75, 1784–1786 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022297700790
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022297700790