Skip to main content
Log in

Topographical Analysis of Homotopic Interhemispheric “Relay” Asymmetries in Visual Evoked Potentials

  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brown and colleagues (1994) found that most evoked potential studies provide evidence of faster interhemispheric relay from the right to the left hemisphere, as determined from N160 latencies derived from parietal and occipital electrode sites. The experiment reported here was designed to complement those findings by 1) analyzing more electrode sites (several frontal, temporal, and central sites in addition to the previously investigated sites) and more waveforms (P1 and P2 waves);3) introducing analysis of amplitude data;4) carrying out site-specific and experiment-wise inference tests of putative interhemispheric relay asymmetry. We found that all of the conclusions of Brown and colleagues, regarding latency effects, could be extended to the ensemble of electrode sites and waveforms. However, amplitude effects were significantly compatible with stronger (though slower) relay from the left to the right hemisphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achim, A., Braun, C.M.J. and Potvin, C. Separation of stimulus and response locked ERP components in reaction time tasks. Dynamical Neuroscience Workshop, Satellite Symposium of Neuroscience, Boca Raton, (Florida), 1994.

  • Baseler, H.A., Sutter, E.E., Klein, S.A. and Carney, T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophy., 1994, 90: 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisiacchi, P., Marzi, C.A., Nicoletti, R., Carena, G., Mucignat, C. and Tomaiuolo, F. Left-right asymmetry of callosal transfer in normal human subjects. Beh. Brain Res., 1994, 64: 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bötzel, K., Plendl, H., Paulus, W. and Scherg, M. Bereitschaftpotential: Is there a contribution of the supplementary motor area? Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophys., 1993, 89: 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C.M.J. Estimation of interhemispheric dynamics from simple unimanual reaction time to extrafoveal stimuli. Neuropsych. Rev., 1992, 3: 171–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C.M.J., Villeneuve, L. and Achim, A. Balance of cost in interhemispheric relay in the Poffenberger paradigm: Evidence from omission errors. Neuropsychology, 1996, 10: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C.M.J., Achim, A. and Villeneuve, L. Topography of averaged electrical brain activity relating to interhemispheric dynamics in normal humans: Where does the critical relay take place? Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1998, in press.

  • Brown, W.S. and Jeeves, M. Bilateral field advantage and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time. Neuropsychologia, 1993, 31: 1267–1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W.S., Larson, E.B. and Jeeves, M.A. Directional asymmetries in interhemispheric transmission time: evidence from visual evoked potentials. Neuropsychologia, 1994, 32: 439–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunia, C.H. and Van den Bosch, W.E. The influence of response side on the readiness potential prior to finger and foot movements: A preliminary report. Sixth International Conference on Event-Related Slow Potentials of the Brain (EPIC VI): Motor control (1981, Lake Forest/Chicago, Illinois). Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 1984, 425: 434–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J.M. and Zaidel, E. Simple reaction times to lateralized light flashes. Brain, 1989, 112: 849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, R.A., Flanagan, J.G. and Harding, G.F.A. Source derivation of the visual evoked response to pattern reversal stimulation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophys., 1985, 62: 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degg, C., Slaven, A. and Armstrong, R.A. Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern onset visual evoked magnetic response. Brain Topogr., 1992, 5: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell, E.B. Handedness in neuropsychological research. In: J.H. Hannay (Ed.), Experimental techniques in human neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Gonzalez, C.M., Clark, V.P., Fan, S., Luck, S.J. and Hillyard, S.A. Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topogr., 1994, 7: 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, G.F.A., Janday, B. and Armstrong, R.A. Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response. Brain Topogr., 1991, 4: 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoptman, M.J. and Davidson, R.J. How and why do the cerebral hemispheres interact? Psych. Bull., 1994, 116: 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoptman, M.J., Davidson, R.J., Gudmundsson, A., Schreiber, R.T. and Ershler, W.B. Age differences in visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transfer. Neuropsychology, 1996, 10: 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Fried, I. and Zaidel, E. Callosal transmission time before and after partial commissurotomy. Neuroreport, 1994, 5: 2521–2524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeeves, M.A. A comparison of interhemispheric transfer times in acallosals and normals. Psychon. Sci., 1969, 16: 245–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., Hillyard, S.A., Volpe, B.T. and Gazzaniga, M.S. Late positive event-related potentials after commissural section in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1990, 2: 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzi, C.A., Bisiachi, P. and Nicoletti, R. Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 1991, 29: 1163–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagamine, T., Toro, C., Balish, M., Deuschl, G., Wang, B., Sato, S., Shibasaki, H. and Hallett, M. Cortical magnetic and electric fields associated with voluntary finger movements. Brain Topogr., 1994, 3: 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfurtscheller, G., Neuper, C. and Berger, J. Source localization using event-related desynchronization (ERD) within the alpha band. Brain Topogr., 1994, 6: 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger, A.T. Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time cost in conduction through nerve centers. Arch. Psychol., 1912, 23: 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potvin, C., Braun, C.M.J. and Achim, A. Distinct functional channels in interhemispheric relay: Experimental evidence. J. Int. Neuropsych. Soc., 1995, 184: (Abstract).

  • Rugg, M.D., Lines, C.R. and Milner, A.D. Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli in two cases of callosal agenesis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr., 1985, 48: 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saron, C.D. and Davidson, R.J. Visual evoked potential measures of interhemispheric transfer time in humans. Beh. Neurosc., 1989, 103: 1115–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, H.G., Costa, L.D. and Ritter, W. Topography of the human motor potential. Electr. Clin. Neurophys., 1968, 25: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldorff, M.G. Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: Analysis and correction. Psychophysiol., 1993, 30: 98–119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braun, C.M., Villeneuve, L. Topographical Analysis of Homotopic Interhemispheric “Relay” Asymmetries in Visual Evoked Potentials. Brain Topogr 11, 223–232 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022285813070

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022285813070

Navigation