Surveys in Geophysics

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 1–38 | Cite as

Radio Tomography: A New Experimental Technique

  • S. E. Pryse


The technique of radio tomography has developed during the past fifteen years from a theoretical concept to an established experimental method, used for geophysical investigations ofsolar-terrestrial processes. It also has potential in the mapping and modelling of the ionised atmosphere for application to practical radio systems. The method involves measurement of the electron content of the ionosphere along a large number of intersecting satellite-to-receiver ray paths, with tomographic inversion of the data to give a two-dimensional image of the spatial distribution of plasma density in the region of ray-path intersection. The emphasis in this review is on experimental tomographic observations, which have highlighted the capabilities and potential of the technique. Examples are presented from the equatorial sector where the equatorial anomaly is a significant feature, the mid-latitude sector where radio propagation is often influenced by the presence of the main ionisation trough, and the auroral and polar regions where footprints of solar-terrestrial coupling processes are frequently to be seen.

auroral blobs dayside high-latitude trough equatorial anomaly field-aligned currents ionised atmosphere ionospheric cusp magnetospheric footprints mid-latitude trough polar hole polar patches radio tomography travelling ionospheric disturbances 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andreeva, E.S., Franke, S.J., Yeh, K.C., and Kunitsyn, V.E.: 2000, Some features of the equatorial anomaly revealed by ionospheric tomography, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2465–2468.Google Scholar
  2. Andreeva, E.S., Galinov, A.V., Kunitsyn, V.E., Mel'nichenko, Yu.A., Tereshchenko, E.D., Filimonov, M.A., and Chernyakov, S.M.: 1990, Radio tomographic reconstruction of ionisation dip in the plasma near the Earth, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 52, 145–148.Google Scholar
  3. Austen, J.R., Franke, S.J., and Liu, C.H.: 1988, Ionospheric imaging using computerized tomography, Radio Sci. 23, 299–307.Google Scholar
  4. Austen, J.R., Franke, S.J., Liu, C.H., and Yeh, K.C.: 1986, Application of computerized tomography techniques to ionospheric research, in A. Tauriainen (ed.), Proc. Beacon Satellite Symposium 1986, University of Oulu, Finland, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
  5. Balthazor, R.L., Denton, M.H. Kersley, L., Pryse, S.E., Walker, I.K., Moffett, R.J., and Bailey, G.J.: 2002, The high-latitude dayside trough under quiet geomagnetic conditions: a comparison of modelled and experimental observations, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. (submitted).Google Scholar
  6. Bernhardt, P.A., Selcher, C.A., and Dymond, K.F.: 2001, Electron densities obtained with the radio beacon and extreme ultra violet instruments on ARGOS, in P. Doherty (ed.), Proc. International Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Bernhardt, P.A., McCoy, R.P., Dymond, K.F., Picone, J.M., Meier, R.R., Kamalabadi, F., Cotton, D.M., Charkrabarti, S., Cook, T.A., Vickers, J.S., Stephan, A.W., Kersley, L., Pryse, S.E., Walker, I.K., Mitchell, C.N., Straus, P.R., Na, H., Biswas, C., Bust, G.S., Kronschnabl, G.R., and Raymund, T.D.: 1998, Two-dimensional mapping of the plasma density in the upper atmosphere with computerized ionospheric tomography (CIT), Physics of Plasmas 5, 2010–2021.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, S.T., Kersley, L., Moen, J., and Denig, W.F.: 2000, Ionospheric signatures of magnetospheric boundaries in the post-noon sector, Ann. Geophysicae 18, 74–80.Google Scholar
  9. Brinton, H.C., Grebowsky, J.M., and Brace, L.H.: 1978, The high-latitude winter F region at 300 km: Thermal plasma observations from AE-C, J. Geophys. Res. 83, 4767–4776.Google Scholar
  10. Bust, G.S., Gaussiran, T.L., and Coker, C.: 2001, Temporal and spatial validity studies of the Greenland high latitude tomography array, in P. Doherty (ed.), Proc. International Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Bust, G.S., Coco, D., and Makela, J.J.: 2000, Combined ionospheric campaign 1: Ionospheric tomography and GPS total electron content (TEC) depletions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2849–2852.Google Scholar
  12. Bust, G.S., Gaussiran, T.L., and Coco, D.S.: 1997, Ionospheric observations of the November 1993 storm, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 14293–14304.Google Scholar
  13. Coker, C., Bust, G.S., Gaussiran, T.L., Waterman, J., Neubert, T., Gudmundsson, E.E., and Thayer, J.P.: 2001, Tomography in Greenland, in P. Doherty (ed.), Proc. International Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Cook, J.A. and Close, S.: 1995, An investigation of TID evolution observed in MACE'93 data, Ann. Geophysicae 13, 1320–1324.Google Scholar
  15. Cowley, S.W.H.: 1998, Excitation of flow in the Earth's magnetosphere-ionosphere system: Observations by incoherent scatter radar, in J. Moen et al. (eds.), Polar Cap Boundary Phenomena, NATO Advanced Science Institute Series 509, 127–140.Google Scholar
  16. Crowley, G.: 1996, Critical review of ionospheric patches and blobs, in W.R. Stone (ed.), URSI Review of Radio Science 1993–1996, pp. 619–648.Google Scholar
  17. Dabas, R.S. and Kersley, L.: 2002, Radio tomographic imaging as an aid to modelling of ionospheric electron density, Radio Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
  18. Dungey, J.W.: 1961, Interplanetary magnetic field and the auroral zones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 47–48.Google Scholar
  19. Fehmers, G.: 1994, A new algorithm for ionospheric tomography, in L. Kersley (ed.), Proc. Beacon Satellite Symposium, University of Wales Aberystwyth, U.K., pp. 52–55.Google Scholar
  20. Foster, J.C., Buonsanto, M.J., Holt, J.M., Klobuchar, J.A., Fougere, P., Pakula, W., Raymund, T.D., Kunitsyn, V.E., Andreeva, E.S., Tereshchenko, E.D., and Khudukon, B.Z.: 1994, Russian-American tomography experiment, Int. J. Imag. Syst. Tech. 5, 148–159.Google Scholar
  21. Foster, J.C. and Doupnik, J.R.: 1984, Plasma convection in the vicinity of the dayside cleft, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 9107–9113.Google Scholar
  22. Fougere, P.F.: 1995, Ionospheric radio tomography using maximum entropy: 1. Theory and simulation studies, Radio Sci. 30, 429–444.Google Scholar
  23. Fremouw, E., Secan, J., Conde, M., and Bust, G.: 2001, Early images from the Alaska tomography array, in P. Doherty (ed.), Proc. International Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Fremouw, E.J., Secan, J.A., Bussey, R.M., and Howe, B.M.: 1994, A status report on applying discrete inverse theory to ionospheric tomography, Int. J. Imag. Syst. Tech. 5, 97–105.Google Scholar
  25. Fremouw, E.J., Secan, J.A., and Howe, B.M.: 1992, Application of stochastic inverse theory to ionospheric tomography, Radio Sci. 27, 721–732.Google Scholar
  26. Fridman, S.V. and Nickisch, L.J.: 2001, Generalization of ionospheric tomography on diverse data sources: Reconstruction of the three dimensional ionosphere from simultaneous vertical ionograms, backscatter ionograms and total electron content data, Radio Sci. 36, 1129–1139.Google Scholar
  27. Hajj, G.A., Ibañez-Meier, R., Kursinski, E.R., and Romans, L.J.: 1994, Imaging the ionosphere with the Global Positioning System, Int. J. Imag. Syst. Tech. 5, 174–184.Google Scholar
  28. Hanson, W.B., and Moffett, R.J.: 1966, Ionization transport effects in the equatorial F region, J. Geophys. Res. 71, 5559–5572.Google Scholar
  29. Heaton, J.A.T., Cannon, P.S., Rogers, N.C., Mitchell, C.N., and Kersley, L.: 2001, Validation of electron density profiles derived from oblique ionograms over the United Kingdom, Radio Sci. 36, 1149–1156.Google Scholar
  30. Heaton, J.A.T., Jones, G.O.L., and Kersley, L.: 1996, Toward ionospheric tomography in Antarctica: First steps and comparison with dynasonde observations, Antarctic Science 8, 297–302.Google Scholar
  31. Hines, C.O.: 1960, Internal atmospheric gravity waves at ionospheric heights, Can. J. Phys. 38, 1441–1481.Google Scholar
  32. Jakowski, N., Sardon, E., Engler, E., Jungstand, A., and Klähn, D.: 1996, Relationships between GPS-signal propagation errors and EISCAT observations, Ann. Geophysicae 14, 1429–1436.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, D.G., Walker, I.K., and Kersley, L.: 1997, Structure of the poleward wall of the trough and the inclination of the geomagnetic field above the EISCAT radar, Ann. Geophysicae 15, 740–746.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, G.O.L., Kersley, L., Heaton, J.A.T., Ciraolo, L., and Spalla, P.: 1998, Ionospheric electron content across the Antarctic continent, Antarctic Science 10, 493–501.Google Scholar
  35. Kak, A.C. and Slaney, M.: 1988, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kamalabadi, F., Inan, U., Franke, S., and Linscott, I.: 2001, Ultra-high-resolution ionospheric radio tomography with dense multidimensional receiver arrays, in P. Doherty (ed.), Proc. International Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Kelly, J.D., and Vickrey, J.F.: 1984, F region ionospheric structure associated with anti-sunward flow near the dayside polar cusp, Geophys. Res. Lett. 11, 907–910.Google Scholar
  38. Kersley, L., Pryse, S.E., Walker, I.K., Heaton, J.A.T., Mitchell, C.N., Williams, M.J., and Willson, C.A.: 1997, Imaging of electron density troughs by tomographic techniques, Radio Sci. 32, 1607–1621.Google Scholar
  39. Kersley, L., Heaton, J.A.T., Pryse, S.E., and Raymund, T.D.: 1993, Experimental ionospheric tomography with ionosonde input and EISCAT verification, Ann. Geophysicae 11, 1064–1074.Google Scholar
  40. Köhnlein, W. and Raitt, W.V.: 1977, Position of the mid-latitude trough in the topside ionosphere as deduced from ESRO 4 observations, Planet. Space Sci. 25, 600–602.Google Scholar
  41. Kronschnabl, G.R., Bust, G.S., Cook, J.A., and Vasicek, C.J.: 1995, Mid-America computerized ionospheric tomography experiment (MACE'93), Radio Sci. 30, 105–108.Google Scholar
  42. Kunitake, M., Ohtaka, K., Maruyama, T., Tokumaru, M., Morioka, A., and Watanabe, S.: 1995, Tomographic imaging of the ionosphere over Japan by the modified truncated SVD method, Ann. Geophysicae 13, 1303–1310.Google Scholar
  43. Kunitsyn, V.E., Andreeva, E.S., and Razinkov, O.G.: 1997, Possibilities of the near-space environment radio tomography, Radio Sci. 32, 1953–1963.Google Scholar
  44. Kunitsyn, V.E., Andreeva, E.S., Razinkov, O.G., and Tereshchenko, E.D.: 1994, Phase and phase difference ionospheric radio tomography, Int. J. Imag. Syst. Tech. 5, 128–140.Google Scholar
  45. Lehtinen, M., Väänänen, A., Vertanen, O., Trakhachev, V.N., Khudukon, B.Z., and Nygrén, T.: 2001, A general-purpose receiver for satellite radiotomography and a tomographic chain to be installed in Scandinavia, in P. Doherty (ed.), Proc. International Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  46. Leitinger, R.: 1996, Tomography, in H. Kohl et al. (eds.), Modern Ionospheric Science-50 Years of Ionospheric Research in Lindau, pp. 346–370.Google Scholar
  47. Lockwood, M. and Carlson, Jr. H.C.: 1992, Production of polar cap electron density patches by transient magnetopause reconnection, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1731–1734.Google Scholar
  48. Markkanen, M., Lehtinen, M., Nygrén, T., Pirttilä, J., Henelius, P., Vilenius, E., Tereshchenko, E.D., and Khudukon, B.Z.: 1995, Bayesian approach to satellite radiotomography with applications in the Scandinavian sector, Ann. Geophysicae 13, 1277–1287.Google Scholar
  49. Mitchell, C.N., Kersley, L., Heaton, J.A.T., and Pryse, S.E.: 1997, Determination of the vertical electron density profile in ionospheric tomography: Experimental results, Ann. Geophysicae 15, 747–752.Google Scholar
  50. Moffett, R.J. and Quegan, S.: 1983, The mid-latitude trough in the electron concentration of the ionospheric F layer: A review of observations and modelling, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 45, 315–343.Google Scholar
  51. Newell, P.T. and Meng, C.-I.: 1992, Mapping the dayside ionosphere to the magnetosphere according to particle precipitation characteristics, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 609–612.Google Scholar
  52. Newell, P.T., Burke, W.J., Sanchez, E.R., Meng, C.-I., Greenspan, M.E., and Clauer, C.R., 1991, The low-latitude boundary layer and the boundary plasma sheet at low altitude: Prenoon precipitation regions and convection reversal boundaries, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 21013–21023.Google Scholar
  53. Nygrén, T., Tereshchenko, E.D., Khudukon, B.Z., Evstafiev, O.V., Lehtinen, M.S., and Markkanen, M.: 2000, Manifestations of field-aligned currents in tomographic observations of the ionospheric F region, Adv. Space Res. 26(6), 939–942.Google Scholar
  54. Nygrén, T., Markkanen, M., Lehtinen, M., Tereshchenko, E.D., and Khudukon, B.Z.: 1997, Stochastic inversion in ionospheric radiotomography, Radio Sci. 32, 2359–2372.Google Scholar
  55. Nygrén, T., Markkanen, M., Lehtinen, M., Tereshchenko, E.D., Khudukon, B.Z., Evstafiev, O.V., Pollari, P.: 1996, Comparison of F-region electron density observations by satellite radio tomography and incoherent scatter methods, Ann. Geophysicae 14, 1422–1428.Google Scholar
  56. Pakula, W.A., Anderson, D.N., Beaudet, M., Bendito, J., Doherty, P.H., Eicher, J., Fougere, P.F., Hughes, L.F., Inzirillo, R., Jakowski, N., Kapel, M., Klobuchar, J.A., Kuenzler, H., Kugland, H.G., Lottig, C., Leitinger, R., Maderbacher, R., Manzano, J.R., Raymund, T.D., Rios, V.H., Sheehan, R., Trepanier, B., Valladares, C., and Whitfield, J.: 1994, Initial total electron content results from the pan American ionospheric tomography campaign, in L. Kersley (ed.), Proc. Beacon Satellite Symposium, University of Wales Aberystwyth, pp. 266–269.Google Scholar
  57. Papitashvili, V.O., Belov, B.A., Faermark, D.S., Feldstein, Ya.I., Golyshev, S.A., Gromova, L.I., and Levitin, A.E.: 1994, Electric potential patterns in the northern and southern polar regions parameterized by the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 13251–13262.Google Scholar
  58. Pinnock, M., Rodger, A.S., and F.T. Berkey, F.T.: 1995, High-latitude F region electron concentration measurements near noon: A case study, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 7723–7729.Google Scholar
  59. Pryse, S.E. and Kersley, L.: 1992, A preliminary experimental test of ionospheric tomography, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 54, 1007–1012.Google Scholar
  60. Pryse, S.E., Smith, A.M., Kersley, L., Walker, I.K., Mitchell, C.N., Moen, J., and Smith, R.W.: 2000, Multi-instrument probing of the polar ionosphere under steady northward IMF, Ann. Geophysicae 18, 90–98.Google Scholar
  61. Pryse, S.E., Kersley, L., Mitchell, C.N., Spencer, P.S.J., and Williams, M.J.: 1998a, A comparison of reconstruction techniques used in ionospheric tomography, Radio Sci. 33, 1767–1779.Google Scholar
  62. Pryse, S.E., Kersley, L., Williams, M.J., and Walker, I.K.: 1998b, The spatial structure of the dayside ionospheric trough, Ann. Geophysicae 16, 1169–1179.Google Scholar
  63. Pryse, S.E., Kersley, L., and Williams, M.J.: 1998c, Electron density structures in the polar cap imaged by ionospheric tomography, Adv. Space Res. 22(9), 1385–1389.Google Scholar
  64. Pryse, S.E., Kersley, L., Williams, M.J., Walker, I.K., and Willson, C.A.: 1997, Tomographic imaging of the polar-cap ionosphere over Svalbard, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 59, 1953–1959.Google Scholar
  65. Pryse, S.E., Mitchell, C.N., Heaton, J.A.T., and Kersley, L.: 1995, Travelling ionospheric disturbances imaged by tomographic techniques, Ann. Geophysicae 13, 1325–1330.Google Scholar
  66. Pryse, S.E., Kersley, L, Rice, D.L., Russell, C.D. and Walker, I.K.: 1993, Tomographic imaging of the ionospheric mid-latitude trough, Ann. Geophysicae 11, 144–149.Google Scholar
  67. Raymund, T.D.: 1995, Comparisons of several ionospheric tomography algorithms, Ann. Geophysicae 13, 1254–1262.Google Scholar
  68. Raymund, T.D., Franke, S.J., and Yeh, K.C.: 1994, Ionospheric tomography: its limitations and reconstruction methods, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 56, 637–657.Google Scholar
  69. Raymund, T.D., Pryse, S.E., Kersley, L., and Heaton, J.A.T.: 1993, Tomographic reconstruction of ionospheric electron density with European incoherent scatter radar verification, Radio Sci. 28, 811–817.Google Scholar
  70. Raymund, T.D., Austen, J.R., Franke, S.J., Liu, C.H., Klobuchar, J.A., and Stalker, J.: 1990, Application of computerized tomography to the investigation of ionospheric structures, Radio Sci. 25, 771–789.Google Scholar
  71. Rino, C.L., Livingston, R.C., Tsunoda, R.T., Robinson, R.M., Vickrey, J.F., Senior, C., Cousins, M.D., Owen, J., and Klobuchar, J.A.: 1983, Recent studies of the structure and morphology of auroral zone F region irregularities, Radio Sci. 18, 1167–1180.Google Scholar
  72. Rius, A., Ruffini, G., and Cucurull, L.: 1997, Improving the vertical resolution of ionospheric tomography with GPS occultations, Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2291–2294.Google Scholar
  73. Robinson, R.M., Tsunoda, R.T., Vickrey, J.F., and Guerin, L.: 1985, Sources of F region ionization enhancements in the nighttime auroral zone, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 7533–7546.Google Scholar
  74. Rodger, A.S., Pinnock, M., Dudeney, J.R., Baker, K.B., and Greenwald, R.A.: 1994, A new mechanism for polar patch formation, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 6425–6436.Google Scholar
  75. Rogers, N.C., Mitchell, C.N., Heaton, J.A.T., Cannon, P.S., and Kersley, L.: 2001, Application of radio tomographic imaging to HF oblique incidence ray tracing, Radio Sci. 36, 1591–1598.Google Scholar
  76. Rosenbauer, H., Grünwaldt, H., Montgomery, M.D., Paschmann, G., and Sckopke, N.: 1975, HEOS-2 plasma observations in the distant polar magnetosphere: The plasma mantle, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 2723–2737.Google Scholar
  77. Rycroft, M.J. and Burnell, S.J.: 1970, Statistical analysis of movements of the ionospheric trough and the plasmapause, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 5600–5604.Google Scholar
  78. Saksman, E., Nygrén, T., and Markkanen, M.: 1997, Ionospheric structures invisible in satellite radiotomography, Radio Sci. 32, 605–616.Google Scholar
  79. Sojka, J. J., Bowline, M.D., Schunk, R.W., Decker, D.T., Valladares, C.E., Sheehan, R., Anderson, D.N., and Heelis, R.A.: 1993, Modelling polar cap F region patches using time varying convection, Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 1783–1786.Google Scholar
  80. Spencer, P.S.J. and Mitchell, C.N.: 2001, Multi-instrument inversion technique for ionospheric imaging, in P. Doherty (ed.), Proc. International Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  81. Sutton, E. and Na, H.: 1996, Ionospheric tomography using the residual correction method, Radio Sci. 31, 489–496.Google Scholar
  82. Sutton, E. and Na, H.: 1994, Orthogonal decomposition framework for ionospheric tomography algorithms, Int. J. Imag. Syst. Tech. 5, 106–111.Google Scholar
  83. Walker, I.K., Pryse, S.E., and Kersley, L.: 2001, The role of radio tomography in the study of ionospheric footprints of space-weather processes, in P. Doherty (ed.), Proc. International Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  84. Walker, I.K., Moen, J., Kersley, L., and Lorentzen, D.A.: 1999, On the possible role of cusp/cleft precipitation in the formation of polar-cap patches, Ann. Geophysicae 17, 1298–1305.Google Scholar
  85. Walker, I.K., Moen, J., Mitchell, C.N., Kersley, L., and Sandholt, P.E.: 1998, Ionospheric effects of magnetopause reconnection observed using ionospheric tomography, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 293–296.Google Scholar
  86. Walker, I.K., Heaton, J.A.T., Kersley, L., Mitchell, C.N., Pryse, S.E., and Williams, M.J.: 1996, EISCAT verification in the development of ionospheric tomography, Ann. Geophysicae 14, 1413–1421.Google Scholar
  87. Weber, E.J., Buchau, J., Moore, J.G., Sharber, J.R., Livingston, R.C., Winningham, J.D., and Reinisch, B.W.: 1984, F layer ionization patches in the polar cap, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 1683–1694.Google Scholar
  88. Whalen, J.A.: 1989, The daytime F layer trough and its relation to ionospheric-magnetospheric convection, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 17169–17184.Google Scholar
  89. Whalen, J.A.: 1987, Daytime F layer trough observed on a macroscopic scale. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 2571–2576.Google Scholar
  90. Williams, M.J.: 1998, Studies in ionospheric tomography, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
  91. Yeh, K.C., Franke, S.J., Andreeva, E.S., and Kunitsyn, V.E.: 2001, An investigation of motions of the equatorial anomaly crest, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 4517–4520.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. E. Pryse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of Wales AberystwythCeredigion

Personalised recommendations