Abstract
One means to address some of the unintended consequences of the shift of treatment for individuals with serious mental illness from hospitals to communities has been involuntary outpatient treatment (IOT). Using Massachusetts data, 19 patients with court orders for IOT were matched to all and to best fits on demographic and clinical variables, and then to individuals with the closest fit on utilization before the IOT date. Outcomes indicated the IOT group had significantly fewer admissions and hospital days after the court order. The full impact of IOT requires more study, particularly directed toward IOT's effects on insight and quality of life.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
REFERENCES
Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 426 (1979)
Addington v. Texas, 429.
Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
Fernandez, G.A. (1992). Evaluation of involuntary outpatient commitment in North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services.
Fernandez, G.A., & Nygard, S. (1990). Impact of involuntary outpatient commitment on the revolving-door syndrome in North Carolina. Hospital & Community Psychiatry,41, 1001–1004.
Geller, J.L. (1986). In again, out again: A preliminary evaluation of a state hospital's worst recidivists. Hospital & Community Psychiatry,37, 386–390.
Geller, J.L. (1986). The quandaries of enforced community treatment and unenforceable outpatient commitment statutes. The Journal of Psychiatry and the Law,14, 149–158.
Geller, J.L. (1990). Clinical guidelines for the use of involuntary outpatient treatment. Hospital & Community Psychiatry,41, 749–755.
Geller, J.L. (1993). On being “committed” to treatment in the community. Innovations and Research,2, 23–27.
Geller, J.L. (1996). Make 'em do it. Psychiatric Services,47, 1157.
Haycock, J., Finkelman, D., & Presskreischer, H. (1994). Mediating the gap: Thinking about alternatives to the current practice of civil commitment. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement,20, 265–289.
Hiday, V.A. (1996). Outpatient commitment: Official coercion in the community. In D.L. Dennis & J. Monahan (Eds.),Coercion and aggressive community treatment. A new frontier in mental health law. New York: Plenum Press.
Hiday, V.A., & Goodman, R.R. (1982). The least restrictive alternative to involuntary hospitalization, outpatient commitment: Its use and effectiveness. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 10, 81–96.
Hiday, V.A., & Scheid-Cook, T.L. (1987). The North Carolina experience with outpatient commitment: A critical appraisal. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 10, 215–232.
Hiday, V.A., & Scheid-Cook, T.L. (1989). A follow-up of chronic patients committed to outpatient treatment. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 40, 52–58.
Lamb, H.R., & Weinberger, L.E. (1992). Conservatorship for gravely disabled psychiatric patients: A four-year follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 909–913.
Lamb, H.R., & Weinberger, L.E. (1993). Therapeutic use of conservatorship in the treatment of gravely disabled psychiatric patients. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 44, 147–150.
Luckstead, A., Coursey, R.D. (1995). Consumer perceptions of pressure and force in psychiatric treatments. Psychiatric Services, 46, 146–152.
Mill, J.S. (1859). On liberty. London: J.W. Parker and Son.
Mulvey, E.P., Geller, J.L., & Roth, L.H. (1987). Balancing the promises and perils of involuntary outpatient commitment. American Psychologist, 42, 571–584.
Schneider-Braus, K. (1986). Civil commitment to outpatient psychotherapy: A case study. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 14, 273–279.
Schwartz, S.J., & Costanzo, C.L. (1987). Compelling treatment in the community: Distorted doctrines and violated values. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 20, 1239–1429.
Siegal, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stefan, S. (1987). Preventive commitment: The concept and its pitfalls. Mental and Physician Disability Law Reporter II, 288–302.
Stone, A.A. (1982). Psychiatric abuse and legal reform: Two ways to make a bad situation worse. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 9–28.
Torrey, E.F., & Kaplan, R.J. (1995). A national survey of the use of outpatient commitment. Psychiatric Services, 46, 778–784.
Treffert, D. (1973). Dying with their rights on. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 1041.
Van Putten, R.A., Santiago, J.M., & Berren, M.R. (1988). Involuntary outpatient commitment in Arizona: A retrospective study. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 39, 953–958.
Zanni, G., & deVeau, L. (1986). Inpatient stays before and after outpatient commitment. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 37, 941–942.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geller, J., Grudzinskas, A.J., McDermeit, M. et al. The Efficacy of Involuntary Outpatient Treatment in Massachusetts. Adm Policy Ment Health 25, 271–285 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022239322212
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022239322212
Keywords
- Public Health
- Mental Illness
- Clinical Variable
- Unintended Consequence
- Outpatient Treatment