Skip to main content
Log in

2D HRR Radar Data Modeling and Processing

  • Published:
Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High Range Resolution (HRR) -based Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) has attracted increasing attention due to a number of potential advantages over alternative radar techniques in moving target identification. Most current HRR-based ATR studies have been conducted using 1D HRR signatures. However, these 1D HRR signatures are generally plagued by scintillation effects, and thus demonstrate highly irregular behavior that dramatically degrades the performance and robustness of algorithms based on these signatures. In order to circumvent this difficulty, an alternative HRR radar data representation and processing technique is presented in this paper. This technique models and extracts the target characteristics directly, based on the 2D HRR raw data. In this paper, we first derive a general, but complex HRR radar model, and then simplify this model by instantiating a set of real-world radar and target parameters for the model. This simplification process produces two HRR radar models with different degrees of simplicity. After establishing this set of models, the typical HRR data processes, such as feature extraction and clutter suppression, are reduced to one problem, which is model-parameter estimation. Based upon the most simplified HRR model we proposed, we devise two model- parameter estimation algorithms. One is a scatterer extraction algorithm based on available 1D Parameter Estimation (1DPE), while the other is based on 2D discrete Fourier Transform (2DFT). In order to examine the performance of these two algorithms a set of simulations are conducted. The experimental results are presented, and the performance comparison between 1DPE and 2DFT is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.P. Jacobs and J.A. O'sullivan, “High Resolution Radar Models for Joint Tracking and Recognition,” SPIE Proceeding, vol. 3069, April 1997.

  2. H.-J. Li and S.-H. Yang, “Using Range Profiles as Feature Vectors to Identify Aerospace Objects,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 41, March 1993, pp. 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Chen and Z. Bao, “High Range Resolution Radar Target Identification Using Multilayer Feedforward Neural Network,” IEEE CIE International Conference of Radar Proceedings 1996, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 215–218.

  4. R. Williams, J. Westerkamp, D. Gross, A. Palomino, and T. Fister, “Automatic Target Recognition of Time Critical Moving Targets Using 1D High Range Resolution (HRR) Radar,” The Record of the 1999 IEEE Radar Conference, 1999, pp. 54–59.

  5. R. Williams, D. Gross, A. Palomino, J. Westerkamp, and D. Wardell, “1D HRR Data Analysis and ATR Assessment,” Air Force Research Laboratory Technical Report, 1998.

  6. C.J. Ying, H. Chiang, R.L. Moses, and L.C. Potter, “Complex SAR Phase History Modeling Using Two Dimensional Parametric Estimation Techniques,” SPIE Symposium on Algorithm for Synthetic Aperture Radar III, June 1996, pp. 174–185.

  7. S.P. Jacobs, J.A. O'sullivan, M. Faisal, A. Srivastava, D.L. Snyder, and M.I. Miller, “Automatic Target Recognition Using Sequences of High-Resolution Radar Range-Profiles,” Electrical System and Signal Research Laboratory Monograph, no. ESSRL-95-26.

  8. S.P. Jacobs, J.A. O'sullivan, M. Faisel, and D.L. Snyder, “Automatic Target Recognition System Using High Resolution Radar,” SPIE Proceeding, vol. 2845, August 1995.

  9. H.J. Li, Y.D. Wang, and L.H. Wang, “Matching Score Properties Between Range Profiles of High-Resolution Radar Targets,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 44, April 1996.

  10. Z. Bi, R. Wu, J. Li, and R. Williams, “High Range Resolution Feature Extraction of Moving Targets in the Presence of Stationary Clutter,” Submitted to IEE Proceeding on Radar, Sonar, and Navigation, August 1998.

  11. R. Wu and J. Li, “HRR Data Model for Non-Rigid Body Moving Targets in the Presence of Range Migration,” TRUMPETS Research Note, Oct. 1998.

  12. J. Ma, and S.C. Ahalt, “Moving Target Modeling, Clutter Suppression, and Feature Extraction,” TRUMPETS Research Note, May 13, 1999.

  13. D.R. Wehner, High-Resolution Radar, 2nd ed., Boston: Artech House Inc., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.W. Rihaczek, Principles of High-Resolution Radar, Boston: Artech House Inc. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Borden, Radar Imaging of Airborne Targets: A Primer for Applied Mathematicians and Physicists, Inst. of Physics Pub., 1999.

  16. J.B. Keller, “Geometrical Theory of Diffraction,” J. Opt. Soc. Amer., January 1962, pp. 116–130.

  17. L.M. Novak, S.D. Halversen, G.J. Owirka, and M. Hiett, “Effects of Polarization and Resolution on the Performance of a SAR Automatic Target Recognition System,” The Lincoln Laboratory Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, 1995, pp. 48–69.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.B. Ressler, R. Williams, D. Gross, and A. Palomino, “Bayesian Multiple-Look Updating Applied to the SHARP ATR System,” SPIE Proceeding, 1999. (http: //www.toyon.com/papers/BayesSPIEpaperFinal.pdf)

  19. W.M. Steedly and R.L. Moses, “High Resolution Exponential Modeling of Fully Polarized Radar Returns,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-27, May 1991, pp. 459–569.

    Google Scholar 

  20. N.F. Chamberlain, E.K. Walton, and F.D. Garber, “Radar Target Identification of Aircraft Using Polarization-Diverse Features,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic System, vol. 27, January 1991, pp. 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  21. N.F. Chamberlain, “Recognition and Analysis of Aircraft Targets by Radar, Using Structural Pattern Representations Derived from Polarimetric Signatures,” Ph.D. Thesis, the Ohio State University, June 1989. Also: ElectroScience Laboratory Report 719710-3.

  22. W.M. Steeply and R.L. Moses, “High Resolution Exponential Modeling of Fully Polarized Radar Returns,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, May 1991, pp. 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S.K. Chaudhuri and W. Boerner, “A Polarimetric Model for the Recovery of the High-Frequency Scattering Centers from Bistatic-Monostatic Scattering Matrix Data,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 35, no. 1, June 1987, pp. 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L.M. Novak, M.B. Sechtin, and M.J. Cardullo, “Studies of Target Detection Algorithms That Use Polarimetric Radar Data,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, July 1989, pp. 150–165.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Giuli, “Polarization Diversity in Radars,” 1986, pp. 245–269.

  26. L.C. Potter and R.L. Moses, “Attributed Scattering Centers for SAR ATR,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Special Issue on Automatic Target Recognition, vol. 6, no. 1, January 1997, pp. 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C.J. Ying, R. Carriere, L.C. Potter, and R.L. Moses, “Radar Target Modeling: A GTD-Based Approach”, Proceedings of SPIE International Symposium on Automatic Object Recognition IV, Orlando, FL, April 4–8 1994, pp. 67–78.

  28. L.C. Potter, D. Chiang, R. Carriere, and M.J. Gerry, “A GTD-Based Parametric Model for Radar Scattering,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 43, no. 10, October 1995, pp. 1058–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Ma and S.C. Ahalt, “Derivation of Physics-Based HRR Moving Target Model,” Proceedings of SPIE International Symposium on Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition IX, Orlando, FL, April 24–28, 2000.

  30. P. Stoica and R. Moses, Introduction to Spectral Analysis, PH, 1997.

  31. P. Stoica, R.L. Moses, T. Soderstrom, and J. Li, “Optimal High-Order Yule-Walker Estimation of Sinusoidal Frequencies,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 39, no. 6, 1991, pp. 1360–1368.

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. Stoica and A. Nehorai, “MUSIC, Maximum Likelihood, and Cramer-Rao Bound,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 35, 1989, pp. 582–584.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Roy and T. Kailath, “ESPRIT–Estimation of Signal Parameters via Rotational Invariance Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Acoust. Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 37, no. 7, 1989, pp. 984–995.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Ma and S.C. Ahalt, “Analysis of Complex HRR Range Signatures,” Proceedings of SPIE International Symposium on Targets and Backgrounds VI, Orlando, FL, April 24–28, 2000.

  35. J. Ma, Doctoral Research Proposal, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, the Ohio State University, Aug. 2000.

  36. Lxthos Products Data Sheet: IXI8250 Dual 8-bit 50 MHz A/D (http: //www.ixthos.com/technical/products/ixianalog/ixi8250_ds.html).

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, J., Du, X. & Ahalt, S.C. 2D HRR Radar Data Modeling and Processing. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing 14, 25–48 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022216924086

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022216924086

Navigation