Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived Hazard and Product Choice: An Application to Recreational Site Choice

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a "perceived hazard" model that estimates consumers' endogenous risk perceptions about products. These perceptions are then linked to a model of product choice. Our approach thus departs from the expected utility model that depends upon external risk assessments. In an application to recreational fishing, we find that anglers' perceived hazards associated with fish consumption advisories do affect product (recreational site) choice. Anglers' perceptions also affect welfare measures because the benefits of contaminant removal flow from these perceptions. The perceived hazard/product choice model is applicable to a wide variety of risky choices consumers face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Akiva, M.E. and S.R. Lerman. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. et al. (1999). "Fishing in Urban New Jersey: Ethnicity Affect Information Sources, Perception, and Compliance," Risk Analysis 19, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H.Z. and S.R. Cosslett. (1998). "Environmental Quality Preference and Benefit Estimation in Multinomial Probit Models: A Simulation Approach," American J. Agricultural Economics 80, 512–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J., P. Slovic, and C.K. Mertz. (1994). "Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks," Risk Analysis 14, 1101–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakus, P.M., D. Dadakas, and J.M. Fly. (1998). "Fish Consumption Advisories: Incorporating Angler-Specific Knowledge, Habits, and Catch Rates in a Site Choice Model," American J. Agricultural Economics 80, 1019– 1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakus, P.M. et al. (1997). "Do Sportfish Consumption Advisories Affect Reservoir Anglers' Site Choice?" Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 26, 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehle, Geoffrey and Phillip Reny. (1998). Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1979). "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk," Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krinsky, I. andA.L. Robb. (1986). "On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities,"Rev. Economics and Statistics 68, 715–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.J. (1987). "Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved," J. Economic Perspectives 1, 121–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClusky, J.J.and G.C. Rausser. (2001). "Estimation of Perceived Risk and Its Effect on Property Values," Land Economics 77, 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, M. and M. Needelman. (1997). "The Welfare Effects of Toxic Contamination in Freshwater Fish," Land Economics 73, 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, E.R. andD.M. Waldman. (1998). "Measurement Error in Recreation Demand Models: The Joint Estimation of Participation, Site Choice, and Site Characteristics," J. Environmental Economics and Management 35, 262–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, E.,W. Breffle, and D. Waldman. (2000). "Combining Sources of Data in the Estimation of Consumer Preferences: Estimating Damages to Anglers from Environmental Injuries," In S. Polasky(ed.),Proceedings of the W-133 Regional Project.

  • O'Connor, R.E., R.J. Bord, and A. Fisher. (1999). "Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change," Risk Analysis 19, 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflugh, K.K. et al. (1999). "Urban Anglers' Perception of Risk from Contaminated Fish," The Science of the Total Environment 228, 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W.D. and J.S. Shonkwiler. (2000). "Brand Choice and Purchase Frequency Revisited: An Application to Recreation Behavior," American J. Agricultural Economics 82, 515–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer, C. (2000). "Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice Under Risk," J. Economic Literature 38, 332–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, K., D. McFadden, and R. Johnson. (2000). "Discussion of Morey and Waldman's Measurement Error in Recreation Demand Models," J. Environmental Economics and Management 40, 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, V.K. (1989). "Prospective Reference Theory: Toward an Explanation of the Paradoxes," J. Risk and Uncertainty 2, 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, K. and W.N. Evans. (1998). "Estimation of Revealed Probabilities and Utility Functions for Product Safety Decisions," Rev. Economics and Statistics 80, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, V.K.,W.A. Magat, and J. Huber. (1999). "Smoking Status and Public Responses to Ambiguous Scientific Risk Evidence," Southern Economic J. 66, 250–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, V.R. (1995). "Direct Inference, Probability, and a Conceptual Gulf in Risk Communication," Risk Analysis 15, 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). "A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity," Econometrica 48, 817–838

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul M. Jakus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jakus, P.M., Shaw, W.D. Perceived Hazard and Product Choice: An Application to Recreational Site Choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26, 77–92 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022202424036

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022202424036

Navigation