Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and Team Building Success

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper has three goals. First, an approach to meta-analysis which combines meta-analytic procedures with a more complete description of the organizational setting is presented. Second, a meta-analysis of the influence of team building on workgroup effectiveness is conducted. The results of this meta-analysis support the contention that team building impacts positively on workgroup productivity. Finally, a discussion of the role of meta-analysis in providing information which both scientists and practitioners may use to understand the relationship between organizational characteristics and the effects of team building on productivity measures is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beer, M. (1976). The technology of organization development. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 937–994). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M. (1980). Organization Change and Development: A systems view. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The Managerial Grid. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, P. F., & Bell, C. J. (1986). Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, R. J., & Tubbs, M. E. (1987). The case meta-analysis method for OD. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 171–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W. W. (1982). Organization Development: Principles and Practices. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T. G., & Huse, E. F. (1989). Organization Development and Change, 4th Ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMuse, K. P., & Liebowitz, S. J. (1981). An empirical analysis of team building. Group and Organization Studies, 6, 357–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G. (1977). Team Building: Issues and Alternatives. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, D. (1985). Team development: A true field experiment at three levels of rigor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, D. (1986). Team development: Quasi-experimental confirmation among combat companies. Group and Organizational Studies, 11, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, W. D., & Bell, C. H., & Zawacki, R. A. (Eds.) (1989). Organization Development: Theory, Practice and Research (3rd edition). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G., McGraw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., Jette, R. D., & Katzell, R. A. (1985). The effects of psychologically based intervention programs on worker productivity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass' estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V. (1982). Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 490–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. L., Rosenbach, W. E., & Clover, W. H. (1983). Team development in an intact, ongoing workgroup: A quasi-field experiment. Group and Organization Studies, 8, 161–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Mulaik, S.A. (1989). A note on validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 440–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., Mulaik, S.A., & Ladd, R.T. (1993). Validity generalization in the context of situational models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. (1986). Team building by disclosure of internal frames of reference. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, G. A., Edwards, J. E., & Raju, N. S. (1989). Organization development interventions: A meta-analysis of their effects on satisfaction and other attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 42, 461–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, J. E. (1989). Why people don't participate in change. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 3, 181–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, J. M. (1982). The comparative impact of organizational development interventions on hard criteria measures. Academy of Management Review, 7, 531–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras, J. I., & Berg, P. O. (1978). Impact of organization development. Academy of Management Review, 3, 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras, J. I., & Robertson, P. J. (1992). Organizational development: Theory, practice, and research. In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd edition (volume 3) (pp. 719–822). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras, J. I., & Silvers, R. C. (1991). Organizational development and transformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, R. & Hunter, J.E. (1991). Impact of Management By Objectives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 322–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Mullen, B., Rozell, D. & Driskell, J.E. (1997). The effects of team building on performance: An integration. Paper presented at the 1997 Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.

  • Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organization in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W. (1989). Organizational change and development: New arenas for inquiry and action. Journal of Management, 15, 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., & Sherwood, J. J. (1980). The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 166–186.

    Google Scholar 

STUDIES INCLUDED IN META-ANALYSIS

  • Butler, P.F. (1988). Long term performance effects of goal setting and team building interventions in an underground silver mine. Organization Development Journal, Summer, 82–93.

  • Buller, P. F., & Bell, C. J. (1986). Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, D. (1985). Team Development: A true field experiment at three levels of rigor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, D. (1986). Team Development: Quasi-experimental confirmation among combat companies. Group and Organizational Studies, 11, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, F. (1967). The impact of organizational training laboratories upon the effectiveness and interaction of ongoing workgroups. Personnel Psychology, 20, 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, R. J. (1977). Building teams for increased productivity. Personnel Journal, 56, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. L., Rosenbach, W. E., & Clover, W. H. (1983). Team development in an intact, ongoing workgroup: A quasi-field experiment. Group and Organization Studies, 8, 161–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. R., & Nielsen, W. R. (1975). Organizational development and change in organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. (1986). Team building by disclosure of internal frames of reference. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, C. F., & Gross, A. C. (1981). Increasing productivity and morale municipality: Effects of organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.E. (1976). Management modeling training to improve morale and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 29, 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svyantek, D.J., Goodman, S.A., Benz, L.L. et al. The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and Team Building Success. Journal of Business and Psychology 14, 265–283 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022195209163

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022195209163

Keywords

Navigation