Skip to main content
Log in

Role of the Dopaminergic System of the Brain in the Effects of Glucocorticoid Hormones

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conditioned reinforcement properties of the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone and the possible mechanisms of its action were studied using a conditioned place preference response. On test day 1, male Wistar rats were placed in a two-chamber apparatus and the time spent in each sector was measured for 10 min. Over the next six days, combinations of one of the chambers with administration of agents (reinforcement) were presented using injections of dexamethasone in one sector and injections of physiological saline in the other sector on alternate days. After combinations of dexamethasone (0.25–0.77 mg/kg, i.p.) with the non-preferred sector, rats showed dose-dependent place preference on test day 2; however, when dexamethasone was combined with the initially preferred sector, animals given dexamethasone at a dose of 0.75 mg/kg showed only a slight level of place avoidance. Subthreshold doses of phenamine (0.25 mg/kg) given alone had no effect; however, when given on a background of dexamethasone (0.25 mg/kg), phenamine evoked a place preference response in rats lacking an initial place preference for one sector. Administration of dexamethasone alone (0.25 mg/kg) in these conditions did not induce place preference. Administration of the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (20 mg/kg) 30 min before combinations of dexamethasone (0.25 mg/kg) with the non-preferred sector completely prevented the acquisition of place preference. Administration of the D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390 (0.05 mg/kg) had no effect on the acquisition of conditioned preference. These results provide evidence for the involvement of D2 receptors in conditioned place preference induced by dexamethasone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. A. Lebedev and P. D. Shabanov, “Comparison of self-stimulation responses and conditioned site preference during administration of phenamine in rats,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 42, No. 4, 692–694 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Ukhtomskii “The dominant as a behavioral factor,” in: Collected Works [in Russian], Academy of Sciences of the USSR Press, Vol. 1, Leningrad (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. M. Uflyand, Stages in the Development of the Concepts of Academician A. A. Ukhtomskii of the Dominant [in Russian], Leningrad State University Press (1975), pp. 59–78.

  4. R. Adreatini and J. R. Leite, “Evidence against the involvement of ACTH/CRF release or corticosteroid receptors in the anxiolytic effect of corticosterone,” Brasil. J. Med. Biol. Res., 17, No. 5, 1237–1241 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Adreatini and J. R. Leite, “The effect of corticosterone in rats submitted to the elevated plus-maze and to pentylenetetrasol-induced convulsion,” Brasil. J. Med. Biol. Res., 18, No. 8, 1333–1347 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Biron, C. Dauphin, and R. Di Paolo, “Effects of adrenalectomy and glucocorticoids on rat brain dopamine receptors,” Neuroendocrinology, 55, No. 4, 469–476 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Cintra, M. Zoli, and L. Rosen, “Mapping and computer assisted morphometry and microdensitometry of glucocorticoid receptor immunoreactive neurons in rat central nervous system,” Neurosci., 62, 843–897 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. L. Costello, J. N. Carlson, S. D. Glick, and M. Bryda, “Dose-dependent and baseline-dependent conditioning with d-amphetamine in the place conditioning paradigm,” Psychopharmacology, 92, No. 2, 244–247 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Deroche, P. V. Piazza, J.-M. Deminiere, and M. Le Moal, “Rats orally self-administer corticosterone,” Brain Res., 622, 315–320 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. E. Goeders and G. F. Guerin, “Role of corticosterone in intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats,” Neuroendocrinology, 64, 337–348 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. A. Healey, I. S. McGregor, B. W. Balleine, and D. M. Atrens, “Environment-specific conditioning produced by electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus,” Physiol. Behav., 46, No. 5, 907–912 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. M. Korte, S. F. De Boer, E. R. De Kloet, and B. Bohus, “Anxiolytic effects of selective mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid antagonists on fear-enhanced behavior in the elevated plus-maze,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, 20, No. 4, 385–394 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. A. Lebedev, O. V. Gurkovskaya, and P. D. Shabanov, “Reinforcing properties of dexamethasone in grouped and isolated rats: comparison of place preference and self-stimulation,” in: Proceedings of the 30th International Society of PsychoNeuroEndocrinology Congress, Orlando, Florida, USA (1999), p. 69.

  14. G. G. Nomicos, and C. Spiraki, “Cocaine-induced place conditioning: importance of route of administration and other procedural variables,” Psychopharmacology, 94, No. 1, 119–125 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. N. Panchenko A. A. Lebedev, and P. D. Shabanov, “Comparison of the effects of dopamine agonists on self-stimulation of the hypothalamus with lesioning of mesolimbic brain structures in rats reared in conditions of social isolation,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 28, No. 2, 130–133 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. V. Piazza, V. Deroche, J. M. Deminiere, and M. Le Moal, “Corticosterone in the range of stress-induced levels possesses reinforcing properties: implications for sensation-seeking behaviors,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 11738–11742 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. P. Piazza and L. M. Le Moal, “Pathophysiological basis of vulnerability to drug abuse: role of an interaction between stress. Glucocorticoids, and dopaminergic neurons,” Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 36, 359–378 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. V. Piazza, F. Rouge-Pont, V. Deroche, and M. Le Moal, “Glucocorticoids have state-dependent stimulant effects on the mesencephalic dopaminergic transmission, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, No. 16, 8716–8720 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. E. Pontiere, G. Tanga, and G. Di Chiara, “Intravenous cocaine, morphine and amphetamine preferentially increase extracellular dopamine in the 'shell- as compared with -core- of the rat nucleus accumbens,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 12, 12304–12308 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. F. Ramsey and S. M. Van Ree, “Emotional but not physical stress enhances intravenous cocaine self-administration in drug naive rats,” Brain Res., 608, 216–222 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Shaham and J. Stewart, “Exposure to mild stress enhances the reinforcing efficacy of intravenous heroine self-administration in rats,” Psychopharmacology, 114, 523–527 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. D. Schechter and D. G. Calcagnetti, “Trends in place preference conditioning with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1957-1991,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 17, No. 1, 21–41 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Wise, “Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis,” Behav. Brain Sci., 5, 39–87 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. A. Wise, P. Leone, R. Rivest, and K. Leeb, “Elevation of nucleus accumbens dopamine and DOPAC levels during intravenous heroin self-administration,” Synapse, 21, 140–148 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lebedev, A.A., Gurkovskaya, O.V., Nozdrachev, A.D. et al. Role of the Dopaminergic System of the Brain in the Effects of Glucocorticoid Hormones. Neurosci Behav Physiol 33, 231–236 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022195113607

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022195113607

Keywords

Navigation