Abstract
The aim of the present work was to identify which parts of the chick brain are activated during treatments inducing the development of the preference to follow a species-specific object (a stuffed chick). Expression of the gene for the transcription factor c-fos was used as the molecular marker for neuron activation. Day-old chicks lacking visual experience were placed for 90 min in a freely rotating squirrel wheel or were subjected to stimulation with a loud noise for 180 min. The animals' preference was tested 24 h after stimulation ended. Both types of stimulation induced the formation of a marked preference to follow the “natural” object in the chicks. c-fos expression was analyzed in sections from the brains of chicks stimulated for 45 min. Increases in the quantity of c-fos mRNA were seen after each type of stimulation in the medial part of the caudal neostriatum. In addition, stimulation in the squirrel wheel was accompanied by high levels of c-fos expression in the paraolfactory lobes, while sound stimulation gave high levels of c-fos expression in the ventral and caudal parts of the archistriatum. These structures of the chick brain are of great interest for studies of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the formation of the species-specific results-of-action acceptor in the mother-following functional system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A. B. Abramova, Systems Expression of the c-fos Gene in the Chick Brain during Visual Imprinting and Training to Passive Avoidance [in Russian], Author's abstract of thesis for doctorate in biological sciences, Moscow (1998).
P. K. Anokhin, “Key questions in the study of higher nervous activity,” in: Questions in Higher Nervous Activity, Nauka, Moscow (1949), p. 9.
P. K. Anokhin, “Fundamental questions in the general theory of functional systems,” in: Principles of the Systems Organization of Functions [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1973), p. 5.
N. A. Bernshtein, The Control of Movements [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1966).
E. M. Bogomolova and Yu. A. Kurochkin, “The systems genesis of behavioral acts in animals in natural living conditions,” Vestn. Akad. Med. Nauk SSSR, 2, No. 1, 79 (1985).
S. N. Khayutin and L. P. Dmitrieva, “Intrasensory and intersensory heterochrony as factors in systems genesis,” in: Systems Genesis [in Russian], K. V. Sudakov (ed.), Meditsina, Moscow (1980), p. 229.
K. V. Shuleikina, Systems Organization of Food-Related Behavior [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1971).
B. V. Shvyrkov, Neurophysiological Studies of the Systems Mechanisms of Behavior [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1978).
K. V. Anokhin, R. Mileusnic, I. Y. Shamakina, and S. P. Rose, “Effects of early experience on c-fos gene expression in the chick forebrain,” Brain Res., 544, No. 1, 101 (1991).
A. Bekoff, “Neuroethological approaches to the study of motor development in chicks: achievements and challenges,” J. Neurobiol., 23, No. 10, 1486 (1992).
J. J. Bolhuis, M. H. Jonson, and G. Horn, “Effect of early experience on the development of filial preferences in the domestic chick,” Developm. Psychobiol., 18, No. 4, 299 (1985).
J. J. Bolhuis, G. G. Zijlstra, A. M. den Boer-Visser, and E. A. Van Der Zee, “Localized neuronal activation in the zebra finch brain is related to the strength of song learning,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, No. 5, 2282 (2000).
P. Bradley, D. C. Davies, and G. Horn, “Connections of the hyperstriatum ventrale of the domestic chick (Gallus domesticus),” J. Anat., 140, No. 4, 577 (1985).
M. W. Brown and G. Horn, “Learning-related alterations in the visual responsiveness of neurons in a memory system of the chick brain,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 6, No. 9, 1479 (1994).
H. T. Cline, E. A. Debski, and M. Constantine-Paton, “N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist disintegrates eye-specific stripes,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84, No. 12, 342 (1987).
J. I. Dubbeldam, “Birds,” in: The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates, Vol. 3, R. Nieuwenhuys, H. J. Donkelaer, and C. Nicholson (eds.), Springer, Berlin (1997), p. 1525.
D. L. Duffy, G. E. Bentley, and G. F. Ball, “Does sex or photoperiodic condition influence ZENK induction in response to song in European starlings?” Brain Res., 844, No. 1-2, 78 (1999).
K. T. Fujiwara, K. Aschida, H. Nishina, et al., “The chicken c-fos gene: cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis,” J. Virol., 61, No. 12, 4012 (1987).
K. Funke, “Somatosensory areas in the telencephalon of the pigeon. II. Spinal pathways and afferent connections,” Exptl. Brain Res., 76, No. 3, 620 (1989).
G. Horn, Memory, Imprinting, and the Brain, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1985).
G. Horn and B. J. McCabe, “Predisposition and preference. Effect on imprinting of lesions to the chick brain,” Anim. Behav., 32, No. 2, 288 (1984).
G. Horn, B. McCabe, and P. P. G. Bateson, “An autoradiographic study of the chick brain after imprinting,” Brain Res., 8, No. 2, 361 (1979).
I. V. Kaplan, Y. Guo, and G. D. Mower, “Developmental expression of the immediate early gene ERG-1 mirrors the critical period in cat visual cortex,” Developm. Brain Res., 90, No. 9, 174 (1995).
W. J. Kuenzel and M. Manson, A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain of the Chick (Gallus domesticus), The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, London (1984).
R. Luckliter and J. Stoumbos, “Enhanced prenatal auditory experience facilitates species-specific visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks (Colinus virginianus),” J. Comp. Psychol., 44, No. 3-4, 89 (1992).
K. Lorenz, “The comparative method in studying innate behaviour patterns,” Symp. Soc. Exptl. Biol., 4, 221 (1950).
M. Lowndes, D. C. Davies, and M. H. Johnson, “Archistriatal lesions impair the acquisition of filial preferences during imprinting in domestic chick,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 6, No. 8, 1148 (1994).
P. Marler, “Inheritance and learning in the development of avian vocalization,” in: Acoustic Behaviour of Animals, R. G. Busnel (ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam (1963), p. 228.
B. J. McCabe, G. Horn, and P. P. Bateson, “Effects of restricted lesions on the chick forebrain on the acquisition of filial preferences during imprinting,” Brain Res., 205, No. 1, 29 (1981).
B. J. McCabe, J. Cipolla-Neto, G. Horn, and P. Bateson, “Amnesic effects of bilateral lesions placed in the hyperstriatum ventrale of the chick after imprinting,” Exptl. Brain Res., 48, No. 1, 13 (1982).
S. Ribeiro, G. A. Cecchi, M. O. Magnasco, and C. V. Merllo, “Toward a song code: evidence for a syllabic representation in the canary brain,” Neuron, 21, No. 2, 359 (1998).
L. Rogers and G. A. Bell, “Different rates of functional development of two visual systems of the chicken revealed by [14C]2-deoxyglucose,” Developm. Brain Res., 49, No. 2, 161 (1989).
S. P. R. Rose, “How chicks make memories: the cellular cascade from c-fos to dendritic remodelling,” Trends Neurosci., 14, No. 9, 390 (1991).
I. Schneider and L. Gray, “Rapid development of a sensory attribute in young chickens,” Hear. Res., 52, No. 2, 281 (1991).
R. Stripling, S. F. Volman, and D. F. Clayton, “Response modulation in the zebra finch neostriatum: relationship to nuclear gene regulation,” J. Neurosci., 17, No. 10, 3883 (1997).
N. Tinbergen, “On aims and methods of ethology,” Z. Tierphysiol., 20, No. 3, 410 (1963).
E. Wallhausser and H. Scheich, “Auditory imprinting leads to differential 2-deoxyglucose uptake and dendritic spine loss in the chick rostral forebrain,” Brain Res., 428, No. 1, 29 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egorova, O.V., Anokhin, K.V. Experimental Analysis of the Processes of Systems Genesis: Expression of the c-fos Gene in the Chick Brain during Treatments Inducing the Development of the Species-Specific Results-of-Action Acceptor. Neurosci Behav Physiol 33, 209–216 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022186911789
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022186911789