American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 483–518 | Cite as

Description and Immediate Impacts of a Preventive Intervention for Conduct Problems

  • John B. Reid
  • J. Mark Eddy
  • Rebecca Ann Fetrow
  • Mike Stoolmiller

Abstract

A population-based randomized intervention trial for the prevention of conduct problems (i.e., oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder) is described. The LIFT (Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers) intervention was designed for all first- and fifth-grade elementary school boys and girls and their families living in at-risk neighborhoods characterized by high rates of juvenile delinquency. The 10-week intervention strategy was carefully targeted at proximal and malleable antecedents in three social domains that were identified by a developmental model of conduct problems. From 12 elementary schools, 671 first and fifth graders and their families participated either in the theory-based universal preventive intervention or in a control condition. The intervention consisted of parent training, a classroom-based social skills program, a playground behavioral program, and systematic communication between teachers and parents. A multiple measure assessment strategy was used to evaluate participant satisfaction and participation, fidelity of implementation, and the immediate impacts of the program on targeted antecedents.

Conduct problems preventive intervention Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers elementary school 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
  2. Bank, L., Marlowe, J. H., Reid, J. B., Patterson, G. R., & Weinrott, M. R. (1991). A comparative evaluation of parent-training evaluations for families of chronic delinquents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 15–33.Google Scholar
  3. Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolfe, M. D. (1969). Good behavior game. Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences and disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 2, 119–124.Google Scholar
  4. Capaldi, D. M., Chamberlain, P., Fetrow, R. A., & Wilson, J. E. (1997). Conducting ecologically valid prevention research: Recruiting and retaining a “whole village” in multimethod, multiagent studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(4), 471–492.Google Scholar
  5. Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1999). Comparison of two community alternatives to incarceration for chronic juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 624–633.Google Scholar
  6. Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualizing data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (1997). The timing and severity of antisocial behavior: Three hypotheses within an ecological framework. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 205–217). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386–1399.Google Scholar
  10. Dolan, L. J., Kellam, S. G., Brown, C. H., Werthamer-Larsson, L., Rebok, G. W., Mayer, L. S., Laudolff, J., Turkkan, J. S., Ford, C., & Wheeler, L. (1993). The short-term impact two classroom-based preventive interventions on aggressive and shy behaviors and poor achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14, 317–345.Google Scholar
  11. Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D., Waternaux, C., & Davis, J. M. (1988). Random regression models: A comprehensive approach to the analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 438–443.Google Scholar
  12. Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., & Smith, L. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 953–961.Google Scholar
  13. Kazdin, A. E. (1994). Interventions for aggressive and antisocial children. In L. D. Eron, J. H. Gentry, & P. Schlegel (Eds.), Reason to hope: A psychosocial perspective on violence and youth (pp. 341–382). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  14. Kellam, S. G., & Werthamer-Larsson, L. (1986). Developmental epidemiology: A basis for prevention. In M. Kessler & S. E. Goldston (Eds.), A decade of progress in primary prevention (pp. 154–180). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  15. Larzelere, R. E., & Patterson, G. R. (1990). Parental management: Mediator of the effect of socioeconomic status on early delinquency. Criminology, 28(2), 301–324.Google Scholar
  16. Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 68–99.Google Scholar
  17. McNeil, C. B., Eyberg, S., Eisenstadt, T. H., Newcomb, K., & Funderburk, B. (1991). Parent-child interaction therapy with behavior problem children: Generalization of treatment effects to the school setting. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 140–151.Google Scholar
  18. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.Google Scholar
  19. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. National Institute of Mental Health (1993). The prevention of mental disorders: A national research agenda. Bethesda, MD: NIMH.Google Scholar
  21. Olds, D. L., Henderson, C., Chamberlin, R., & Tatelbaum, R. (1986). Preventing child abuse and neglect: A randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics, 78, 65–78.Google Scholar
  22. Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., & Kitzman, H. (1994). Does prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation have enduring effects on qualities of parental caregiving and child health at 25 to 50 months of life? Pediatrics, 93, 89–98.Google Scholar
  23. Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  24. Patterson, G. R., & Reid, J. B. (1984). Social interactional processes within the family: The study of moment-by-moment family transactions in which human social development is embedded. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 237–262.Google Scholar
  25. Patterson, G. R., & Yoerger, K. (1997). A developmental model for late-onset delinquency. In D. W. Osgood (Ed.), Motivation and delinquency: Volume 44 of the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 119–177). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  26. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., Jones, R. R., & Conger, R. E. (1975). A social learning approach to family intervention. I. Families with aggressive children. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  27. Patterson, G. R., Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1982). A comparative evaluation of parent training procedures. Behavior Therapy, 13, 638–650.Google Scholar
  28. Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44(2), 329–335.Google Scholar
  29. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). A social learning approach. 4. Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  30. Reid, J. B. (1993). Prevention of conduct disorder before and after school entry: Relating interventions to development findings. Journal of Development and Psychopathology, 5, 243–262.Google Scholar
  31. Reid, J. B., & Eddy, J. M. (1997). The prevention of antisocial behavior: Some considerations in the search for effective interventions. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), The handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 343–356). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  32. Robins, L. N. (1981). Epidemiological approaches to natural history research: Antisocial disorders in children. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 20, 566–580.Google Scholar
  33. Rusby J., Estes, A., & Dishion, T. J. (1991). Interpersonal process code (unpublished technical manual). Eugene: Oregon Social Learning Center.Google Scholar
  34. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sanders, M. R., & Dadds, M. R. (1993) Behavioral family intervention. Needem Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  36. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Stoff, D. M., Breiling, J., & Masters, J. D. (Eds.) (1997). The handbook of antisocial behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  38. Stoolmiller, M. (1996). Visual-graphical techniques for the analysis of growth curves: Correlated change and predictors of growth in substance use for male adolescents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Adolescence, Boston, MA, Mar.Google Scholar
  39. Taylor, T., & Biglan, A. (1999). Behavioral family interventions for improving childrearing: A review of the literature for clinicians and policymakers. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, in press.Google Scholar
  40. Webster-Stratton, C. (1989). Systematic comparison of consumer satisfaction of three cost-effective parent training programs for conduct problem children. Behavior Therapy, 20(1), 103–116.Google Scholar
  41. Wiggins, J. S. (1988). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
  42. World Health Organization (1992). Annual report on homicide. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • John B. Reid
    • 1
  • J. Mark Eddy
    • 1
  • Rebecca Ann Fetrow
    • 1
  • Mike Stoolmiller
    • 1
  1. 1.Oregon Prevention Research Center, Oregon Social Learning CenterU. S. A.

Personalised recommendations