Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Validation Procedure for the Mera and French WMO-GAW Precipitation Chemistry Networks

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the setting-up of a validation procedure, especially adapted to therainwater samples of the MERA and French WMO-GAW networks. A first study reveals that theion and conductivity balances, usually used as quality criteria, depend on salinity. The statisticaltool or "physico-chemical filter" proposed in this paper, includes two mathematical models basedon 97th percentile of the ion and conductivity balances, from the 1991 and 1992 data taken asreferences. This dynamic validation uses the rejection limits which increase with salinity. Itsapplication shows a significant decrease of the total rejection rate between the first and third yearof running. This seems to be due to the improvement in quality of the analytical line. The rejectedsample inspection does not reveal apparent bias errors for the filter. This kind of validation seemsto be well adapted to screen the samples in a precipitation collection network such as MERA andWMO-GAW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artz, R. S. and Lavrinenko, R. F.: 1993, Env.Mon.and Ass. 26, I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encinas, D., Casado, H. and Lacaux, J. P: 1993, J.Environ.Sci.Health 28, 1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara, H., Sekigichi, K. and Ujiie, A,: 1986, Environ.Sci.Lett. 7, 597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D. A,: 1973, Nonparametric Statistical Methods, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, D. W.: 1963, Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 2, 431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A,: 1984, Water; Air; and Soil Pollut. 21, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, L. J. and Yost, K. J.: 1982, Atmos.Environ. 16, 2889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noller, B. N., Currey, N. A., Ayers, G. P. and Gillet, R. W.: 1990, Sci.Total Environ. 91, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinard, P.: 1990, Report for the Ministry of Environment M–90–9 (in french), Direction des RCseaux Atmosphkriques, Sainte Foy, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajsic, S., Otten, Ph. and Van Grieken, R.: 1991, Environmental Technology 12, 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruijgrok, W. and Romer, F. G.: 1993, Atmos.Environ. 27, 637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira, R.: 1991, Atmos.Environ. 25, 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaug, J.: 1988, Quality assurance plan for EMEP, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Lillestrom, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisterson, D. L.: 1989, Water,Air,and Soil Pollut. 43, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, E. and Williot, B.: 1993, Report of National Office of Forests (in french), Fontainebleau, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weast, R. C. (ed.): 1989, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 70th edition, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weijers, E. P. and Vugts, H. F.: 1990, Atmos.Environ. 24, 3021.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plaisance, H., Coddeville, P., Guillermo, R. et al. Dynamic Validation Procedure for the Mera and French WMO-GAW Precipitation Chemistry Networks. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 93, 267–284 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022162304638

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022162304638

Keywords

Navigation