Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Role Ideology and the Gender Based Differences in Earnings

  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much of the research on gender differences in occupational earnings still focuses on human capital and the structure of the labor market. However, these variables rarely explain even half of the gender gap in earnings. Most research has examined the impact of gender role ideology as it impacts occupational choice, which indirectly can impact earnings. Using data from the National Opinion Research Center General Social Surveys, this research focuses on the relationship between attitudes about gender roles and two variables: (a) earnings, and (b) occupational positions held by women and men. Findings show that traditional gender-role ideology contributes to lower observed earnings for both males and females, independent of the influences of human capital characteristics, occupational context, and ascribed characteristics. Results support socialization as a partial explanation for the gender-based earnings differences and suggest that, to the extent that economic rewards are used to assess the value of gender role expectations, traditional gender role attitudes might continue to change and lead to relatively equal earnings among women and men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basow, S. A. (1992) Gender role ideology and the gender based differences in earnings. In Gender: Stereotypes and roles (3rd ed). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1971). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (2nd ed). NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1), S33-S58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N. E. (1987). Implication of the null environment hypothesis and women's career development and for counseling psychology. Counseling Psychologist, 17(1), 136-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, D. D., & Bielby, W. T. (1985). She works hard for the money: Household responsibilities and the allocation of effort. Cited in Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research (p.312). B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, W. K. (1991). The economic organization of the household. MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaswick, B. (1983). The earnings and human capital of American Jews. Journal of Human Resources, 18(3), 313-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaswick, B. (1985). The labor market status of American Jews: Patterns and determinants. American Jewish yearbook, 131-53.

  • Conte, M. (1976). Labor market discrimination against women. Chapter 9 in Five thousand American families—Patterns of economic progress. Vol IV (pp. 257-284). In G. J. Duncan & J. N. Morgan (Eds). ISR: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darity, W. Jr., Guilkey, D. K., & Winfrey, W. (1996). Explaining differences in economic performance among racial and ethnic groups in the USA: The data examined. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 55(4), 411-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. & Smith, T. W. (1996). General Social Surveys, 1972–1994. [machine-readable data file]. Principal Investigator, James A. Davis; Director and Co-Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith. NORC ed. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, producer, 1994; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, distributor. 1 data file (32,380 logical records) and 1 codebook (p. 1073).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G., & Corcoran, M. (1984). Do women ‘deserve’ to earn less than men? In Duncan, G. (Ed.) with Coe, R., Corcoran, M., Hill, M., Hoffman, S., & Morgan, J. Years of poverty, years of plenty (pp. 153-172). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, ISR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, K. C. (1996). Gender differences in the effect of education on the slope of experience-earnings profiles: National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1979–1988. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 55(4), 457-471.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P. (1992). Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P., & McCreary, L. (1987a). Integrating sociology and economics to study gender and work. In A. Stromberg, L. Larwood, & B. Gutek. (Eds.), Women and work: An annual review. Vol 2 (pp. 143-172). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P., & McCreary, L. (1987b). Gender inequality in paid employment. In Hess, B. B. & Feree, M. M. (Eds.), Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research (pp. 286-320). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facteau, J. D., & Dobbins, G. H. (1996). Sex bias in performance evaluations. In P. J. Dubeck & K. Borman (Eds.), Women and work: A handbook (pp. 334-338). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldberg, R. L. (1987). Women and trade unions: Are we asking the right questions? In C. Bose, R. Feldberg, & N. Sokoloff (Eds), Hidden aspects of women's work (pp. 299-322). NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filer, R. K. (1983). Sexual differences in earnings: The role of individual personalities and tastes. Journal of Human Resources, 18(1), 82-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J., & Firestone, J. M. (1998). Changes in predictors of gender role ideologies among women: A multivariate analysis. Sex Roles, 38(3/4), 239-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, J. (1991). Male-female differences in hourly wages: The role of human capital, working conditions and housework. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44(4), 746-759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Turrisai, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression series: Quantitative application in the social sciences. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L., & Berg, I. (1987). Work and industry: Structures, markets, and processes. NY: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, A. A. (1994). Women's work; Degraded and devalued. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, B. S., & England, P. (1996). Occupational skill, gender, and earnings. In Dubeck, P. J. & Borman, K. (Eds.), Women and work; A handbook (pp. 68-71). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, B. S., England, P., Farkas, G., Beron, K., & Weir, D. (1994). Returns to skill, compensating differentials, and gender bias: Effects of occupational characteristics on the wages of White women and men. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 689-719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M. R. (1987). Heterogeneous preferences, compensating wage differentials and comparable worth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 727-742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M., & Schooler, C. (1978). The reciprocal effects of the substantive complexity of work and intellectual flexibility: A longitudinal assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 24-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, R. (Ed.) (1991). The encyclopedic dictionary of sociology (4th ed.). Guilford, CT: The Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, J. L. (1979). The second X: Sex role and social role. NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, E. (1989). The development and use of a consistent income measure for the General Social Survey. University of Chicago: GSS Methodological Report No. 64.

  • Lindsay, P., & Knox, W. E. (1984). Continuity and change in work values among young adults: A longitudinal study. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 918-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., McFarlin, D. B., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1399-1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallan, L. B. (1982). Labor force participation, work experience and the pay gap between men and women. The Journal of Human Resources, 17, 437-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M. (1978). Sex differences in the determination of adolescent aspirations: A review of research. Sex Roles, 4(5), 723-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M., & Brinton, M. C. (1984). Sex typing in occupational socialization. In B. Reskin (ed.) Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies (pp. 192-232). Washington D. C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M., Fan, P. L., Finley, E., & Beutel, A. M. (1996). Gender and job values. Sociology of Education, 69(1), 49-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. NY: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P. (1992). Women's two roles: A contemporary dilemma. NY: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, J. T., & Lorence, J. (1979). Work experience and occupational value socialization: A longitudinal study. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1361-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parcel, T. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1983). Ascription and labor markets: Race and sex differences in earnings. NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S.W. (1984). Women in the economy: Perspectives on gender inequality. In Comparable worth: Issue for the 80s (pp. 34-53). NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R. A., & Kalleberg, A. L. (1990). A cross-national comparison of the gender gap in income. American Journal of Sociology, 96(1), 69-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A. (1992). Women, men, and time. NY: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, N. M. (1994). Career women in perspective: The Wichita sample. In C. W. Konek & S. L. Kitch (Eds.), Women and careers: Issues and challenges (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, E. (1989). Measuring the effect of occupational sex and race composition on earnings. In R. T. Michael, H. I. Hartmann, & B. O'Farrell (Eds.) Pay equity: Empirical inquiries (pp. 49-69). Washington D. C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1981). Ethnic America: A history. NY: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. J. (1990). Social construction of skill: Gender, power, and comparable worth. Work and Occupations, 17, 449-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, R. A. (1995). Gender, influence tactics, and job characteristics preferences: New insights into salary determination. Sex Roles, 32(9/10), 617-638.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1994). Labor force, employment, and earnings, http://www.census.gov/prod/1/gen/95statab/labor.pdf.

  • Ward, K. B., & Mueller, C. W. (1985). Sex differences in earnings: The influence of industrial sector, authority hierarchy, and human capital variables. Work and Occupations, 12, 437-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury, S. (1993). Culture and human capital: Theory and evidence or theory versus evidence? In Darity, W. Jr. (Ed), Labor economics: Problems in analyzing labor markets (pp. 239-268). Norwell: Kluver Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zill, N., & Rogers, C. C. (1988). Recent trends in the well-being of children in the U. S. and their implications for public policy. In A. J. Cherlin (Ed.), The changing American family and public policy (pp. 31-115). Washington D. C.: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Firestone, J.M., Harris, R.J. & Lambert, L.C. Gender Role Ideology and the Gender Based Differences in Earnings. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 20, 191–215 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022158811154

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022158811154

Navigation