Skip to main content
Log in

Parental Involvement Laws and Minor and Non-Minor Teen Abortion and Birth Rates

  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of parental notice and consent laws on abortion and birth rates were analyzed for two groups of teens: those 15 to 17 years old (i.e., minor teens) and those 18 to 19 years old (i.e., non-minor teens). Twelve states report abortion and birth statistics at the county level for these two age groups. The sample consists of 597 counties from these twelve states. Residence county abortion and birth rates were regressed against parental notice laws, parental consent laws, and several control variables (i.e., type of state public funding, population density, education and income levels, unemployment rate, family stability, extent of poverty, church membership, and geographic region).

An important finding of this study is that both parental consent and notification laws were related to significantly lower abortion rates and to significantly higher birth rates for both minor and non-minor teens. Three measures (i.e., church membership, family stability, and education level) were related negatively and significantly to minor and non-minor teens' abortion rates and birth rates. One other measure (i.e., restrictive public funding) was related significantly to lower abortion rates and higher birth rates for minor and non-minor teens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Americans United for Life (AUL). (1996). State parental involvement statutes. Available from author at 343 S. Dearborn St., Suite 1804, Chicago, IL.

  • Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1990). Human capital, fertility, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5,2), S12-S37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. (1992). Churches and church membership in the U.S. Atlanta: Glenmary Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census (1996). USA counties 1996 [CD-ROM]. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.

  • Cartoof, V. G., & Klerman, L. V. (1986). Parental consent for abortion: Impact of the Massachusetts law. American Journal of Public Health 76, 397-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, G. C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two Linear regressions. Econometrica, 591-605.

  • Conrad, C. A. (1996, January 18). Is pregnancy a rational choice for poor teenagers? The Wall Street Journal, B1(3).

  • Currie, J., Nixon, L., & Cole, N. (1996). Restrictions on Medicaid funding for abortion: Effects on birth weight and pregnancy resolution. Journal of Human Resources 31(1), 159-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbacz, C. (1990). Abortion demand. Population Research and Policy Review 9, 151-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greens, W. (1993). Econometrics analysis (2nd ed). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas-Wilson, D. (1996). The impact of state abortion restrictions on minors' demand for abortions. The Journal of Human Resources 31, 140-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, S. (1995). The impact of requirements for parental consent on minors' abortions in Mississippi. Family Planning Perspectives 27, 120-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymowitz, K. (November 13, 1994). Real life on the teen mommy track: the middle-class ‘script’ gets no reading in the inner city. The Washington Post, C1(C2).

  • Joyce, T., & Kaestner, R. (1996). State reproductive policies and adolescent pregnancy resolution: The case of parental involvement laws. Journal of Health Economics 15, 579-607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, P. B., Trainor, A. B., & Zimmerman, D. J. (1996). The effect of Medicaid abortion funding restrictions on abortions, pregnancies, and births. Journal of Health Economics 15, 555-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. G. (1995) An economic analysis of pregnancy resolution in Virginia specific as to race and residence. Journal of Population Economics, 8(3), 253-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall, W., & Sinich, T. (1989). A second course in business statistics: Regression analysis. San Francisco, CA: Dellen Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL). (1997). Restrictions on minors' access to abortion report. [On-line] Available: http://www.naral.org/publications/chart3a.html)

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1989). Applied linear regression models (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohsfeldt, R. L., & Gohmann, S. F. (1994). Do parental involvement laws reduce adolescent abortion rates? Contemporary Policy Issues 12, 65-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. L., Boruch, R. F., Stoms, G. B., & DeMoya, D. (1991). Impact of the Minnesota Parental Notification Law on abortion and birth, American Journal of Public Health 81(3), 294-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, D. S. (1992). An economic approach to abortion demand. The American Economist 36, 53-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollom, T., & Gold, R. (1996). Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994. Family Planning Perspectives 28(4), 166-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, A. M., Velebil, P., Koonin, L., Strauss, L., Goodman, K., Wingo, P., Wilson, J., Morris, L., & Marks, J. (1996). Pregnancy, abortion, and birth rates among U.S. adolescents-1980, 1985, and 1990. Journal of the American Medical Association 274, 989-994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W. (1995). A note on ‘An economic approach to abortion demand’. The American Economist 39(2), 90-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, S. J. (1994). Recent trends in teenage childbearing in the United States. Statistical Bulletin 10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomal, A. Parental Involvement Laws and Minor and Non-Minor Teen Abortion and Birth Rates. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 20, 149–162 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022154710245

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022154710245

Navigation