Abstract
The present paper describes the development and validation of the Preference for the Merit Principle (PMP) Scale, a measure to assess people's preference for allocating outcomes on the basis of the distributive justice principle of merit. On the basis of data from a large sample of undergraduate students, we tested the construct and predictive validity of the scale and compared the results with the performance of two existing justice scales (Rasinski's, 1987, Proportionality Scale, and Rubin and Peplau's, 1975, Belief in a Just World Scale). Overall, we found that the PMP Scale had superior construct validity as compared with the Proportionality Scale. In brief, the PMP Scale was more independent of conceptually distinct constructs, such as prejudice and right-wing authoritarianism. In addition, unlike the Proportionality and Just World Scales, the PMP Scale was able to predict participants' future attitudes toward affirmative action
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage, Newbury Park.
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right wing authoritarianism, University of Manitoba Press, Winnipeg.
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of Freedom, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Bobocel, D. R., Son Hing, L. S., Davey, L. M., Stanley, D. J., and Zanna, M. P. (1998). Justice-based opposition to social policies: Is it genuine? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75: 653–669.
Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. Amer. Psychol. 39: 214–227.
Cose, E. (1995, April 3). The myth of meritocracy. Newsweek 34.
Crocker, L., and Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX.
Davey, L. M., Bobocel, D. R., Stanley, D. J., and Zanna, M. P. (1997, June). Reactions to an affirmative action program beneficiary: Factors that affect perceptions of respect, liking, and competence. Poster presented at the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto, ON.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? J. Soc. Iss. 31: 137–150.
Deutsch, M. (1979). A critical review of “equity theory”: An alternative perspective on the social psychology of justice. Intl. J. Group Tensions 1–4: 20–49.
Furnham, A., and Proctor, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 28: 365–384.
Lerner, M. J., and Miller, D. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychol. Bull. 85: 1030–1051.
Lerner, M. J. (1974). The justice motive: “Equity” and “parity” among children. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 29: 539–550.
Maes, J. (1998). Eight stages in the development of research on the construct of belief in a just world. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 163–185.
Major, B., and Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 43–76.
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism: Theory and research, Academic Press, New York, pp. 91–125.
Murrell, A. J., Dietz-Uhler, B. L., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., and Drout, C. (1994). Aversive racism and resistance to affirmative action: Perceptions of justice are not necessarily color blind. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 15: 71–86.
Nunnally, J. C. (1970). Introduction to Psychological Measurement, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., and Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 741–763.
Rasinski, K. A. (1987). What's fair is fair—or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53: 201–211.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? J. Social Iss. 31: 65–87.
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., and Joly, S. (1995). Neo-sexism: Plus ç a change, plus c'est pareil. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2: 842–849.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davey, L.M., Bobocel, D.R., Son Hing, L.S. et al. Preference for the Merit Principle Scale: An Individual Difference Measure of Distributive Justice Preferences. Social Justice Research 12, 223–240 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022148418210
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022148418210