Skip to main content
Log in

Fair Division: From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelson, H. L. (1995). The origins of a concept of social justice. In Irani, K. D. (ed.), The Idea of Social Justice in the Ancient World, Greenwood Press: Westwood, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. B., Bazerman, M. H., and Carroll, J. S. (1991). An evaluation of learning in the bilateral winner's curse. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 48: 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1994). Thinking and Deciding. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H. (1993). Fairness, social comparison, and irrationality. In Murnighan, J. K. (ed.), Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, pp. 184-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H. (1998). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, 4th ed., John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. (1995). Individual decision making. In Kagel, J. H., and Roth, A. E. (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., and Weigelt, K. (1988). Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model. Econometrica 56: 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • deCarufel, A. (1979). Factors affecting the evaluation of improvement: The role of normative standards and allocator resources. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37: 847-857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1992). Local Justice. Russell Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, P., and Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Learning to avoid the winner's curse. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67: 170-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, W., and van Damme, E. (1998). Information, strategic behavior, and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: An experimental study. Int. J. Game Theory, in press.

  • (1986). Journal of Business 59(4), part 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J. H., and Roth, A. E. (1995). The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, L. M., and Murnighan, J. K. (1993). Conjecture, uncertainty, and cooperation in prisoner's dilemma games: Some experimental evidence. J. Econ. Behav. Organiz. 22: 91-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Economy 98: 1325-1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., and Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoner's dilemma, J. Econ. Theory 27: 245-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. F., Thompson, L., and Bazerman, M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57: 426-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, S. T. (1987). The Archaeology of Economic Ideas: The Classical Greek Tradition. Duke University Press, Durham, ND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1993). Inequality, distributive justice, and organizational illegitimacy. In Murnighan, J. K. (ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, pp. 184-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean Parks, J., Boles, T. L., Conlon, D. J., DeSouza E., Gatewood, W., Gibson, K. L., Halpern, J., Locke D., Nekich, J., Straub P. G., Wilson G., and Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Distributing adventitious outcomes: Social norms, egocentric martyrs, and the effects on future relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67: 181-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. W. (1986). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. Jossey Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnighan, J. K. (1991). The Dynamics of Bargaining Games. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnighan, J. K., and Ross, T. (1999). On the collaborative potential of psychology and economics. J. Econ. Behav. Organiz. Introduction to special issue, forthcoming.

  • Pillutla, and Murnighan, J. K. (1999). Fairness and justice in bargaining and in allocation decisions and procedures. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Plott, C. R., and Levine, M. E. (1978). A model of agenda influence on committee decisions. Am. Econ. Rev. 68: 146-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., and Ward, A. Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 27, Diego, San, Academic Press, pp. 255-304.

  • Roth, A. E., and Murnighan, J. K. (1982). The role of information in bargaining: An experimental study. Econometrica 50: 1123-1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. (1991). Quasi-Rational Economics. Russell Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., and Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 47: 98-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., Valley, K., and Kramer, R. (1995). The bittersweet feeling of success: An examination of social perception in negotiation. J. Exper. Soc. Psychol. 31: 467-492.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M., and Bar-Hillel, M. (1984). On dividing justly. Soc. Choice Welfare 1: 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murnighan, J.K. Fair Division: From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution. Social Justice Research 12, 149–162 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022099910864

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022099910864

Keywords

Navigation