Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Surfactants as Possible Enhancers in Bioremediation of Creosote Contaminated Soil

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study on five nonionic surfactants (Arkopal-N-060, Arkopal-N-080, Arkopal-N-100, Hosaf-541-KS and Tween-80)commercially available in South Africa was carried out todetermine their effect on the desorption and degradation ofcreosote in a soil contaminated with 250 000 mg kg-1creosote with a view to developing a cost effective methodologyfor treating creosote contaminated soils. The surfactants werestudied in concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 0.35, 0.5 and 1.0% (v/v) in liquid cultures. Results from the studies showedthat all the surfactants studied were able to enhance thedesorption and degradation of creosote to different extents. Theenhancement ranged from as little as <10% in 0.1% surfactant toas high as 45% in 0.5% surfactant. The effect on degradation ofcreosote was more obvious (30–65%) in the different surfactantsat different concentrations. Arkopal-N-060 was observed to be themost effective in the desorption and degradation of creosote. Theeffect of Hosaf-541-KS on the degradation of creosote was foundto be comparable with those of Arkopal-N-060, however, itsdesorption capabilities were much lower than those of Arkopa-N-060.The concentration of the surfactant was found to play asignificant role in desorption of creosote. It was observed thatsurfactant concentrations of 0.35 and 0.5% were the mosteffective in the desorption of creosote. Above and below theseconcentrations, the effect of the surfactants was observed todecrease. All surfactants studied were not found to inhibitmicrobial growth at the concentrations studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul, A. S., Gibson, T. L., Ang, C. C., Smith, J. C. and Sobcznski, R. E.: 1992, ‘In situ washing of polychlorinated biphenyls and oils from a contaminated site’, Ground Water 30, 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M.: 1999, Biodegradation and Bioremediation, Academic Press, San Diego, 302 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas, R. M.: 1981, ‘Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons: An environmental perspective’, Microbial Rev. 45, 180–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K. H. and Herson, D. S.: 1994, Bioremediation, McGraw-Hill, Toronto, 375 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, P.: 1965, Emulsions: Theory and Practice, Reinhold, New York, 57 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriere, P. P. E. and Mesania, F. A.: 1995, ‘Enhanced biodegradation of creosote-contaminated soil’, Waste Management 15(8), 579–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, J.: 1984. ‘The Fate of Petroleum Pollutants in Fresh-water Ecosystems’, in R. M. Atlas (ed.), Petroleum Microbiology, MacMillan, New York, pp. 399–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B.: 1994, ‘Reclaiming Contaminated Land: In situ/ex situ Remediation of Creosote-and Petroleum Hydrocarbon-contaminated Sites’, in P. E. Flatham, D. E. Jerger and J. H. Exner (eds), Bioremediation: Field Experience, Lewis Publishers, London, pp. 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjessing, E. T. and Berglind, L.: 1981, ‘Adsorption of PAH to aquatic humus’, Arch. Hydrobiol. 92, 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, W. F. and Boyd, S. A.: 1992. ‘Differential bioavailability of soil-sorbed naphthalene to two bacterial species’, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 1142–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutnik, D. L. and Rosenberg, E.: 1977, ‘Oil tankers and pollution: A microbiological approach’, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 31, 379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansch, C. and Fujita, T.: 1964, ‘A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure’,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 36, 1616–1626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. B., Beckles, D. M., Chandra, S. D. and Ward, C. H.: 1997, ‘Utilization of bioremediation processes for the treatment of PAH-contaminated sediments’,J. Indust. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18, 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karickhoff, S. W.: 1980, ‘Sorption Kinetics of Hydrophobic Pollutants in Natural Sediments’, in R. A. Baker (ed.), Contaminants and Sediments. Vol. 2. Fate and Transport Studies, Modeling, Toxicity, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, pp. 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, S. L.: 1994, ‘The Use of Surfactants to Enhance Pump-and-treat Process for in situ Soil Remediation’, in D. L. Wise and D. J. Trantolo (eds), Remediation of Hazardous Waste Contaminated Soils, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. D., Thomas, J. M., Borden, R. C., Bedient, P. B., Ward, C. H. and Wilson, J. T.: 1988, ‘Biorestoration of aquifers contaminated with organic compounds’, CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control. 18, 29–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, Z. M.: 1996, ‘Bioremediation of Oil-contaminated Soil: A South African Case Study’, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Micrbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 350 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Laha, S. and Luthy, R. G.: 1991, ‘Surfactant solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds in soil water suspensions’, Water Sci. Technol. 23, 475–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J. B., Unterman, R., Brennan, M. J., Brooks, R. E. Mobley, D. P., Scwartz, C. C. and Dietrich, D. K.: 1989, ‘Two strategies for PCB soil remediation: Biodegradation and surfactant extraction’, Environ. Progress 8, 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihelcic, J. R and Luthy, R. C.: 1991, ‘Sorption and microbial degradation of naphthalene in soilwater suspensions under denitrification conditions’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 25, 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. E. and Alexander, M.: 1991, ‘Kinetics of bacterial degradation of benzylamine in a montmorillonite suspension’, Environ. Sci. Tech. 25, 240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. M.: 1995, ‘Surfactant-enhanced Bioavailability of Slightly Soluble Organic Compounds’, in H. D. Skipper and R. F. Turco (eds), Bioremediation Science and Application. Soil Science, Special Publication, No. 43, Soil Science Society of America.

  • Mulkins-Phillip, G. J. and Stewart, J. E.: 1974, ‘Effect of 4 dispersants on biodegradation and growth of bacteria on crude oil’, Appl. Microbiol. 28, 547–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakahara, T., Hisasuka, K. and Minoda, Y.: 1981, J. Ferment. Technol. 59, 415–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberbremer, A., Müller-Hertig, R. and Wagna, F.: 1990, ‘Effect of the addition of microbial surfactant on hydrocarbon degradation in a soil population in a stirred reactor’, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32, 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. J., Backhus, D. A., Capel, P. D. and Eisenreich, S. J.: 1996, ‘Temperature-dependent sorption of naphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene to low organic carbon sediments’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 751–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanseverino, J., Graves, D. A., Leavitt, M. E., Gupta, S. K. and Luthy, R. G.: 1994, ‘Surfactantenhanced Bioremediation of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Coke Waste’, in D. L. Wise and D. J. Trantolo (eds), Remediation of Hazardous Waste Contaminated Soils, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H.: 1998, Principles of Soil Chemistry, 3rd ed., Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalkowski, S. H. and Valvani, S. C.: 1979, ‘Solubility and partitioning 2. Relationships between aqueous solubilities, partition coefficients and molecular surface areas of rigid aromatic hydrocarbons’, J. Chem. Engin. Data 24, 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeom, I. T., Ghosh, M. M. and Cox, C. D.: 1996, ‘Kinetic aspects of surfactant solubilization of soil-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 1589–1595.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. I. Atagana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atagana, H.I., Haynes, R.J. & Wallis, F.M. The Use of Surfactants as Possible Enhancers in Bioremediation of Creosote Contaminated Soil. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 142, 137–149 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022070504841

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022070504841

Navigation