Abstract
Two studies are reported addressing the reliability of the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS). The first study investigated test-retest reliability over a two-week period to determine the stability of the measure over time. The second study investigated inter-rater reliability between two teachers or classroom aides who were familiar with a student to determine the consistency with which the measure can be used by different individuals. In each study, samples were drawn from populations of students identified with emotional or behavioral disorders as specified by federal statutes. Reliability coefficients in each study were above .80, the standard recommended for screening tests that are reported individually, and in most cases above .90. Implications for use of the BERS are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
REFERENCES
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. Supporting and strengthening families: Methods, strategies, and practice (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Epstein, M. H. (in press). The development and validation of a scale to assess the emotional and behavioral strengths of children and adolescents. Remedial and Special Education.
Epstein, M. H., & Sharma, J. (1998). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Hodges, K. (1989). Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Eastern Michigan University.
Lourie, J. S., Katz-Leavy, J., & Stroul, B. A. (1994). Individualized services in a system of care. In B. A. Stroul (Ed.), Children's mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society. Baltimore: Brooks.
Nelson, C. M., & Pearson, C. A. (1991). Integrating services for children and youth with and behavioral disorders. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. (1987). Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami, Department of Psychology.
Saleeby, D. (1992). The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1998). Assessment (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1994). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.
VanDenBerg, J. E., & Grealish, E. M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 7–22.
U.S. Department of Education. (1994). National agenda for achieving better results for children and youth with serious emotional disturbance, Washington, DC: Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Epstein, M.H., Harniss, M.K., Pearson, N. et al. The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability. Journal of Child and Family Studies 8, 319–327 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022067329751
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022067329751
- Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS)
- test-retest reliability
- inter-rater reliability