Skip to main content
Log in

Is the Emotional Stroop Paradigm Sensitive to Malingering? A Between-Groups Study with Professional Actors and Actual Trauma Survivors

  • Published:
Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Six professional actors, trained by psychologists and acting coaches to feign PTSD, were covertly enrolled into a treatment outcome study for PTSD with the aim of investigating malingering. During pretreatment assessment, individuals completed an emotional Stroop task. Vocal response latencies to different classes of stimuli were examined for sensitivity to malingering. Actor response latencies were compared to those of 6 nonlitigant PTSD patients and 6 nonanxiety controls. The actor/dissimulation group was able to feign an overall slowing of response latency across stimulus types, similar to the PTSD group. However, they were unable to modulate response latency as a function of stimulus content, a pattern that characterized the PTSD group. The use of information-processing paradigms to detect dissimulation is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 5, 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. T. R., Baer, R. A., & Harris, M. J. (1991). Detection of malingering on the MMPI: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 585–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, J. R., & Spreen, O. (1989). Predicting premorbid IQ: A revision of the National Adult Reading Test. Clinical-Neuropsychologist, 3, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, D., Weathers, F., Nagy, L., Kaloupek, D., Klauminzer, G., Charney, D., et al. (1997). Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS). Boston: National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Behavioral Science Division–Boston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. B., & Buckley, T. C. (1999). Psychophysiological assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. In P. A. Saigh & D. J. Bremner (Eds.), Posttraumatic stress disorder: A comprehensive text (pp. 248–266). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. B., & Hickling, E. J. (1997). After the crash. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, R. A., & Harvey, A. G. (1995). Processing threatening information in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 537–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, T. C., Blanchard, E. B., & Neill, W. T. (2000). Information processing and PTSD: A review of the empirical literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 1041–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). The American heritage word frequency book. New York: American Heritage Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbank, J. A., McCaffrey, R. J., & Keane, T. M. (1985). Psychometric detection of fabricated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 501–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P)—Version 2.0. New York: Biometrics Research Department–New York State Psychiatric Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., Feske, U., Murdock, T. B., Kozak, M. J., & McCarthy, P. R. (1991). Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frueh, B. C., Hamner, M. B., Cahill, S. P., Gold, P. B., & Hamlin, K. (2000). Apparent symptom overreporting in combat veterans evaluated for PTSD. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 853–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frueh, B. C., & Kinder, B. N. (1994). The susceptibility of the Rorschach Inkblot Test to malingering of combat related PTSD. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 280–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerardi, R. J., Blanchard, E. B., & Kolb, L. C. (1989). Ability of Vietnam veterans to dissimulate a psychophysiological assessment for post-traumatic stress disorder. Behavior Therapy, 20, 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. G., Bryant, R. A., & Rapee, R. M. (1996). Pre-recognition processing of threat in posttraumatic stress disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 613–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, G. W. (1996). Basic statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling, E. J., Blanchard, E. B., Mundy, E., & Galovski, T. E. (2002). Detection of malingered MVA related posttraumatic stress disorder: An investigation of the ability to detect professional actors by experienced clinicians, psychological tests, and psychophysiological assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowtiz, M. J., Wilmer, N., & Alvarez, N. (1979). Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. A., Caddell, J. M, Pitman, R. K., Rawls, R., & Perrin, S. (1994). The potential for faking on the Mississippi Scale for combat-related PTSD. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 441–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An intergrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1995). Automaticity and the anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 747–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Amir, N., & Lipke, H. J. (1996). Subliminal processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Kentish, J., & Bradley, B. P. (1993). Effects of anxiety and awareness on colour-identification latencies for emotional words. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 559–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. A. (1997). Startle response in individuals with PTSD. National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Clinical Quarterly, 7, 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, S. P., & Pitman, R. K. (1993). Psychophysiologic assessment of attempts to simulate posttraumatic stress disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 33, 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, R. K., & Orr, S. P. (1993). Psychophysiologic testing for post-traumatic stress disorder: Forensic psychiatric application. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 21, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P. J. (1997). Malingering of posttraumatic stress disorders. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 130–152). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, B. O., Foa, E. B., Riggs, D. S., Murdock, T., & Walsh, W. (1992). A prospective examination of post-traumatic stress disorder in rape victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5, 455–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speilberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). STAI manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Herman, D. S., Huska, J. A., & Keane, T. M. (1993, October). The PTSD checklist: Reliability, validity & diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, TX.

  • Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd C. Buckley.

About this article

Cite this article

Buckley, T.C., Galovski, T., Blanchard, E.B. et al. Is the Emotional Stroop Paradigm Sensitive to Malingering? A Between-Groups Study with Professional Actors and Actual Trauma Survivors. J Trauma Stress 16, 59–66 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022063412056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022063412056

Navigation