Abstract
Lester Salamon and Helmut Anheier's “Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally” offers a thorough cross-national quantitative analysis of the correlates of nonprofit-sector size, composition, and sources of funding. The first study of its kind, it is remarkable in both its theoretical ambition and empirical scope. Still, this research is plagued by problems that affect almost all research of this type: small numbers, poor measures, vague theories, a preponderance of cross-sectional data, and so on. Suggestions for improving the research include: (1) disaggregating the definition of the nonprofit sector to address criticisms from both the right and the left; (2) adopting a multidimensional approach to assessment of the nonprofit sector, to deal with its great heterogeneity; (3) devoting more attention to possible nonlinear relationships; and (4) casting a wider theoretical net in the effort to build a convincing “social origins” perspective. In the end, Salamon and Anheier may be forced to devote more effort to qualitative analysis of specific sectors to demonstrate the explanatory power of the social origins perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Moore, B., Jr. (1966). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, Beacon Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rokkan, S. (1970). Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development, David McKay, New York.
Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, this issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ragin, C.C. Comments on “Social Origins of Civil Society”. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 9, 261–270 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022062301894
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022062301894