Recent research has usefully documented the contribution that nonprofit organizations make to “social capital” and to the economic and political development it seems to foster. Because of a gross lack of basic comparative data, however, the question of what it is that allows such organizations to develop remains far from settled. This article seeks to remedy this by testing five existing theories of the nonprofit sector against data assembled on eight countries as part of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project. The five theories are: (a) government failure/market failure theory; (b) supply-side theory; (c) trust theories; (d) welfare state theory; and (e) interdependence theory. The article finds none of these theories adequate to explain the variations among countries in either the size, the composition, or the financing of the nonprofit sector. On this basis it suggests a new theoretical approach to explaining patterns of nonprofit development among countries—the “social origins” approach—which focuses on broader social, political, and economic relationships. Using this theory, the article identifies four “routes” of third-sector development (the liberal, the social democratic, the corporatist, and the statist), each associated with a particular constellation of class relationships and pattern of state-society relations. The article then tests this theory against the eight-country data and finds that it helps make sense of anomalies left unexplained by the prevailing theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anheier, H. K., and Seibel, W. (1998). The Nonprofit Sector in Germany, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Archambault, E. (1996). The Nonprofit Sector in France, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Ben-Ner, A., and Gui, B. (1993). Introduction. In Ben-Ner, A., and Gui, B. (eds.), The Nonprofit Sector in the Mixed Economy, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Flora, P., and Alber, J. (1981). Modernization, democratization and the development of welfare states in Western Europe. In Flora, P., and Heidenheimer, A. (eds.) The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, Transaction, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Flora, P., and Heidenheimer, A. (eds.) (1981). The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, Transaction, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, The Free Press, New York.
Hansmann, H. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 839–901.
Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Hicks, A., and Swank, D. H. (1992). Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 658–674.
Huber, E., Ragin, C., and Stephens, J. D. (1993). Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structures, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 711–749.
James, E. (1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. W. Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Kendall, J. and Knapp, M. (1996). The Voluntary Sector in the UK, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Krashinsky, M. (1986). Transaction costs and a theory of the nonprofit organization. In S. Rose-Ackerman (ed.), The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
Moore, B., Jr. (1966). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, Beacon Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the Welfare State, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Quadagno, J. (1987). Theories of the welfare state. Annual Review of Sociology 13, 109–128.
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E., and Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
Salamon, L. M. (1970). Comparative history and the theory of modernization. World Politics, XXIII(1), 83–103.
Salamon, L. M. (1987a). Partners in public service: The scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. W. Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Salamon, L. M. (1987b). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49.
Salamon, L. M. (1992). America's Nonprofit Sector: A Primer, Foundation Center, New York.
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. (1992a). In search of the nonprofit sector. I: The question of definitions. Voluntas, 3(2), 125–151.
Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. (1992b). In search of the nonprofit sector. II: The problem of classification. Voluntas, 3(3), 267–309.
Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. (1996). The Emerging Nonprofit Sector, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. (eds.) (1997). Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-National Analysis, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K., Sokolowski, W., and Associates (1996). The emerging sector: A statistical supplement. Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies, Baltimore, Maryland.
Seibel, W. (1990). Government/third sector relationships in a comparative perspective: The cases of France and West Germany. Voluntas, 1(1), 42–61.
Titmuss, R. (1974). Social Policy: An Introduction, Pantheon, New York.
United Nations (1993). The 1993 System of National Accounts, United Nations, New York.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1994). Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1994, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Weisbrod, B. (1977). The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector, Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts.
World Values Study Group (1994). World Values Survey, 1981–1984 and 1990–1993 [Computer File], ICPSR Version, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor.
About this article
Cite this article
Salamon, L.M., Anheier, H.K. Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 9, 213–248 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022058200985
- nonprofit theory
- social origins theory
- comparative methodology
- cross-national comparisons