Abstract
Is the concept of “global civil society” a Sorelian-type myth that captures intuitively an emergent political project? Or is it, rather, a discursive political terrain open to many interpretations, not all of which might be progressive? A radical democratic content would be one way of filling out the “empty signifier,” which “global civil society” is, but not the only one.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anheier, H. (2001). Measuring global civil society. In: Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.), Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 221-230.
Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.) (2001). Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Archibugi, D., and Held, D. (eds.) (1995). Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Biekart, K. (1999). The Politics of Civil Society Building, International Books and the Transnational Institute, Amsterdam.
Butler, J., Laclau, E., and Zizek, S. (2000). Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Verso, London.
Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences, Routledge, London.
Chossudovsky, M. (1999). Seattle and beyond: Disarming the New World Order. www.transnational.org/forum/meet/seattle.html
Cohen, J., and Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Colás, A. (2001). The promise of international civil society: Global governance, cosmopolitan democracy and the end of sovereignty. www.theglobalsite.ac.uk
Commission on Global Governance (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Drainville, A. (1998). The fetishism of global civil society: Global governance, transnational urbanism and sustainable capitalism in the world economy. In: Smith, M. P., and Guarmizo, L. E. (eds.), Transnationalism from Below, Transaction Books, London.
Drainville, A. (2001). Quebec City 2001 or the Making of Transnational Subjects. In: Panitch, L., and Leys, C. (eds.), The Socialist Register 2002: A World of Contradictions, Merlin Press, London.
Evans, P. (2000). Fighting marginalization with transnational networks: Counter-hegemonic globalization. Contemp. Sociol. 29(1): 230-241.
Falk, R. (1999). Global civil society: Perspectives, initiatives, movements. In: Falk, R. (ed.), Predatory Globalisation: A Critique, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 137-153.
Featherstone, M., Lash, S., and Robertson, R. (eds.) (1995). Global Modernities, Sage, London.
Friedman, E. J., Hochstetler, K., and Clark, A. M. (2001). Sovereign limits and regional opportunities for global civil society in Latin America. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 36(3): 7-35.
Giddens, A. (1995). Beyond Left and Right, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Halliday, F. (2000). The romance of non-state actors. In: Josselin, D., and Wallace, W. (eds.), Non State Actors in World Politics, Palgrave, London, pp. 21-37.
Hertz, N. (2001). The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy, Heinemann, London.
Kaldor, M. (2000). 'Civilising’ globalisation? The implications of the ‘Battle of Seattle.’ Millennium 29(1): 105-111.
Keane, J. (2001). Global civil society? In: Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.), Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 23-37.
Klein, N. (2001). No Logo, Flamingo, London.
Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Verso, London.
Lipschutz, R. (1992). Reconstructing world politics: The emergence of civil society. Millennium 21(3): 389-420.
McGrew, A. (ed.) (1997). The Transformation of Democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Munck, R. (2002). Globalisation and Labour: The New Great Transformation? Zed Books, London.
Petras, J., and Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Globalisation Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century, Zed Books, London.
Pianta, M. (2001). Parallel summits of global civil society. In: Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.), Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 169-194.
Scholte, J. A. (2000). Global civil society. In: Woods, N. (ed.), The Political Economy of Globalisation, Palgrave, London, pp. 173-202.
Shaw, M. (2000). Theory of the Global State: Globality as Unfinished Revolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Smith, M. P. (2001). Transnational Urbanism: Locating Globalisation, Blackwell, Oxford.
Sorel, G. (1961). Reflections on Violence, Norton, New York.
Waterman, P. (1998). Globalisation, Social Movements and the New Internationalisms, Mansell, London.
Wood, E. M. (1990). The uses and abuses of civil society. In: Miliband, R., and Panitch, L. (eds.), The Socialist Register 1990, Merlin Press, London, pp. 60-84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Munck, R. Global Civil Society: Myths and Prospects. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 13, 349–361 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022057909467
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022057909467