Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Is the concept of “global civil society” a Sorelian-type myth that captures intuitively an emergent political project? Or is it, rather, a discursive political terrain open to many interpretations, not all of which might be progressive? A radical democratic content would be one way of filling out the “empty signifier,” which “global civil society” is, but not the only one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anheier, H. (2001). Measuring global civil society. In: Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.), Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 221-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.) (2001). Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D., and Held, D. (eds.) (1995). Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biekart, K. (1999). The Politics of Civil Society Building, International Books and the Transnational Institute, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J., Laclau, E., and Zizek, S. (2000). Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chossudovsky, M. (1999). Seattle and beyond: Disarming the New World Order. www.transnational.org/forum/meet/seattle.html

  • Cohen, J., and Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colás, A. (2001). The promise of international civil society: Global governance, cosmopolitan democracy and the end of sovereignty. www.theglobalsite.ac.uk

  • Commission on Global Governance (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drainville, A. (1998). The fetishism of global civil society: Global governance, transnational urbanism and sustainable capitalism in the world economy. In: Smith, M. P., and Guarmizo, L. E. (eds.), Transnationalism from Below, Transaction Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drainville, A. (2001). Quebec City 2001 or the Making of Transnational Subjects. In: Panitch, L., and Leys, C. (eds.), The Socialist Register 2002: A World of Contradictions, Merlin Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (2000). Fighting marginalization with transnational networks: Counter-hegemonic globalization. Contemp. Sociol. 29(1): 230-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (1999). Global civil society: Perspectives, initiatives, movements. In: Falk, R. (ed.), Predatory Globalisation: A Critique, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 137-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, M., Lash, S., and Robertson, R. (eds.) (1995). Global Modernities, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E. J., Hochstetler, K., and Clark, A. M. (2001). Sovereign limits and regional opportunities for global civil society in Latin America. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 36(3): 7-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1995). Beyond Left and Right, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, F. (2000). The romance of non-state actors. In: Josselin, D., and Wallace, W. (eds.), Non State Actors in World Politics, Palgrave, London, pp. 21-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, N. (2001). The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2000). 'Civilising’ globalisation? The implications of the ‘Battle of Seattle.’ Millennium 29(1): 105-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2001). Global civil society? In: Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.), Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 23-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2001). No Logo, Flamingo, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipschutz, R. (1992). Reconstructing world politics: The emergence of civil society. Millennium 21(3): 389-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, A. (ed.) (1997). The Transformation of Democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, R. (2002). Globalisation and Labour: The New Great Transformation? Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, J., and Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Globalisation Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century, Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, M. (2001). Parallel summits of global civil society. In: Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.), Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 169-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2000). Global civil society. In: Woods, N. (ed.), The Political Economy of Globalisation, Palgrave, London, pp. 173-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. (2000). Theory of the Global State: Globality as Unfinished Revolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. P. (2001). Transnational Urbanism: Locating Globalisation, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorel, G. (1961). Reflections on Violence, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, P. (1998). Globalisation, Social Movements and the New Internationalisms, Mansell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. M. (1990). The uses and abuses of civil society. In: Miliband, R., and Panitch, L. (eds.), The Socialist Register 1990, Merlin Press, London, pp. 60-84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munck, R. Global Civil Society: Myths and Prospects. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 13, 349–361 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022057909467

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022057909467

Navigation