Abstract
This paper argues that, to date, current research into global civil society suffers from weak description and inadequate theorization. The way forward requires interpreting global civil society as a progressive multiorganization field with innovative network forms and transformative purpose.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ainger, K. (2001). To open a crack in history. New Internationalist, No. 338. www.newint.org/issue338/keynote.htm
Ancelovici, M. (2002). Organizing against globalization: The case of ATTAC in France. Pol. Soc. 30(3): 427-463.
Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (2001). Introducing global civil society. In: Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.), Global Civil Society Yearbook, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 5-27.
Brecher, J., Costello, T., and Smith, B. (2000). Globalization from Below: The Power of Solidarity, South End Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cerulo, K. A. (1997). Reframing sociological conceptions for a Brave New (virtual?) World. Sociol. Inq. 67(1): 48-58.
Chossudovsky, M. (1997). The Globalization of Poverty: Impacts of IMF and World Bank Reforms, Third World Network, Penang/Zed Books, London.
Clark, J. (ed.) (2003, forthcoming). Global Civic Engagement: Civil Society and Transnational Action, Earthscan, London.
Cohen, R., and Rai, S. (eds.) (2000). Global Social Movements, Athlone Press, London.
Edwards, M., and Gaventa, J. (eds.) (2001). Global Citizen Action, Earthscan, London.
Evans, P. (2000). Fighting marginalization with transnational networks: Counter-hegemonic globalization. Contemp. Sociol. 29(1): 230-241.
Florini, A. M. (ed.) (2000). The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, Japan Center for International Exchange, Tokyo/Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC.
Florini, A. M., and Simmons, P. J. (2000). What the world needs now? In: Florini, A. M. (ed.), The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, Japan Center for International Exchange, Tokyo/Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC, pp. 1-15.
Fox, J. A., and Brown, L. D. (eds.) (1998). The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hardt, M. (2002). Today's Bandung? New Left Review 14(March/April): 112-118.
Heinrich, F., and Naidoo, K. (2002). Maturation vs. moroseness: Reflections on this year's WSF and WEF. Alliance 7(2): 19.
Horkheimer, M. (1972). Traditional and critical theory. In: Connerton, P. (ed.), Critical Sociology: Selected Readings, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 206-224.
Keck, M. E., and Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NJ.
Klein, N. (2001). No Logo, Flamingo, London.
Kriesi, H. (1996). The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context. In: McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 152-184.
Lichbach, M. I., and Almeida, P. (2002). Global order and local resistance: The neoliberal institutional trilemma and the battle of Seattle. Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside. www.cidcm.umd.edu/dcawcp/papers/GlobalPaper-01b.doc
Lindenberg, M., and Bryant, C. (2001). Going Global: Transforming Relief and Development NGOs, Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, CT.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. (eds.) (1996). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mekata, M. (2000). Building partnerships toward a common goal: Experiences of the international campaign to ban landmines. In: Florini, A. M. (ed.), The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, Japan Center for International Exchange, Tokyo/Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC, pp. 143-176.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination, Oxford University Press, New York.
Nash, K. (2000). Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics, and Power, Blackwell, Oxford.
Neale, J. (2002). You are G8, We are 6 Billion: The Truth Behind the Genoa Protests, Vision Paperbacks, London.
Nelson, P. (2002). New agendas and new patterns of international NGO political action. Voluntas 13(4): 377-392.
Salamon, L. M. (1994). The rise of the nonprofit sector. Foreign Aff. 73(4): 109-122.
Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K., List, R., Toepler, S., Sokolowski, S. W., and Associates (2000). Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, Center for Civil Society Studies, Baltimore, MD.
Scholte, J. A. (1999). Global civil society: Changing the world? CSGR Working Paper No. 31/99, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick, UK. www.csgr.org
Scholte, J. A., and Schnabel, A. (eds.) (2002). Civil Society and Global Finance, Routledge, London.
Scott, M. J. O. (2001). Danger—Landmines! NGO-Government collaboration in the Ottawa Process. In: Edwards, M., and Gaventa, J. (eds.), Global Citizen Action, Earthscan, London, pp. 121-133.
Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents, Penguin, London.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Fishnets, internets, and catnets: Globalization and transnational collective action. In: Hanagan, M. P., Moch, L. P., and te Brake, W. (eds.), Challenging Authority: The Historical Study of Contentious Politics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 228-244.
The Economist (December 11–17, 1999). The non-governmental order: Will NGOs democratize, or merely disrupt, global governance? www.gdrc.org/ngo/wto-ngo.html
Tvedt, T. (2002). Development NGOs: Actors in a global civil society or in a new international social system? Voluntas 13(4): 363-376.
Waterman, P. (1996). Beyond globalism and developmentalism: Other voices in world politics. Dev. Change 27(1): 165-180.
Waterman, P. (1999). Activists beyond borders and theorists within them. Transnatl. Assoc. 51(1): 39-40. www.uia.org/uiata/kecsik.htm
Wolin, S. S. (1969). Political theory as a vocation. Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 63(4): 1062-1082.
Yearbook of International Organizations (2002). Union of International Associations and K. G. Saur Verlag, München, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, R. Interpreting Global Civil Society. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 13, 339–347 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022046125396
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022046125396