Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This paper argues that, to date, current research into global civil society suffers from weak description and inadequate theorization. The way forward requires interpreting global civil society as a progressive multiorganization field with innovative network forms and transformative purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ainger, K. (2001). To open a crack in history. New Internationalist, No. 338. www.newint.org/issue338/keynote.htm

  • Ancelovici, M. (2002). Organizing against globalization: The case of ATTAC in France. Pol. Soc. 30(3): 427-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (2001). Introducing global civil society. In: Anheier, H., Glasius, M., and Kaldor, M. (eds.), Global Civil Society Yearbook, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 5-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, J., Costello, T., and Smith, B. (2000). Globalization from Below: The Power of Solidarity, South End Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerulo, K. A. (1997). Reframing sociological conceptions for a Brave New (virtual?) World. Sociol. Inq. 67(1): 48-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chossudovsky, M. (1997). The Globalization of Poverty: Impacts of IMF and World Bank Reforms, Third World Network, Penang/Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (ed.) (2003, forthcoming). Global Civic Engagement: Civil Society and Transnational Action, Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., and Rai, S. (eds.) (2000). Global Social Movements, Athlone Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., and Gaventa, J. (eds.) (2001). Global Citizen Action, Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (2000). Fighting marginalization with transnational networks: Counter-hegemonic globalization. Contemp. Sociol. 29(1): 230-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A. M. (ed.) (2000). The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, Japan Center for International Exchange, Tokyo/Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A. M., and Simmons, P. J. (2000). What the world needs now? In: Florini, A. M. (ed.), The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, Japan Center for International Exchange, Tokyo/Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC, pp. 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. A., and Brown, L. D. (eds.) (1998). The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. (2002). Today's Bandung? New Left Review 14(March/April): 112-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, F., and Naidoo, K. (2002). Maturation vs. moroseness: Reflections on this year's WSF and WEF. Alliance 7(2): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1972). Traditional and critical theory. In: Connerton, P. (ed.), Critical Sociology: Selected Readings, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 206-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., and Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2001). No Logo, Flamingo, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. (1996). The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context. In: McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 152-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M. I., and Almeida, P. (2002). Global order and local resistance: The neoliberal institutional trilemma and the battle of Seattle. Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside. www.cidcm.umd.edu/dcawcp/papers/GlobalPaper-01b.doc

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, M., and Bryant, C. (2001). Going Global: Transforming Relief and Development NGOs, Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. (eds.) (1996). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekata, M. (2000). Building partnerships toward a common goal: Experiences of the international campaign to ban landmines. In: Florini, A. M. (ed.), The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, Japan Center for International Exchange, Tokyo/Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC, pp. 143-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, K. (2000). Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics, and Power, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, J. (2002). You are G8, We are 6 Billion: The Truth Behind the Genoa Protests, Vision Paperbacks, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (2002). New agendas and new patterns of international NGO political action. Voluntas 13(4): 377-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (1994). The rise of the nonprofit sector. Foreign Aff. 73(4): 109-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K., List, R., Toepler, S., Sokolowski, S. W., and Associates (2000). Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, Center for Civil Society Studies, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (1999). Global civil society: Changing the world? CSGR Working Paper No. 31/99, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick, UK. www.csgr.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A., and Schnabel, A. (eds.) (2002). Civil Society and Global Finance, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. J. O. (2001). Danger—Landmines! NGO-Government collaboration in the Ottawa Process. In: Edwards, M., and Gaventa, J. (eds.), Global Citizen Action, Earthscan, London, pp. 121-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (1998). Fishnets, internets, and catnets: Globalization and transnational collective action. In: Hanagan, M. P., Moch, L. P., and te Brake, W. (eds.), Challenging Authority: The Historical Study of Contentious Politics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 228-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (December 11–17, 1999). The non-governmental order: Will NGOs democratize, or merely disrupt, global governance? www.gdrc.org/ngo/wto-ngo.html

  • Tvedt, T. (2002). Development NGOs: Actors in a global civil society or in a new international social system? Voluntas 13(4): 363-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, P. (1996). Beyond globalism and developmentalism: Other voices in world politics. Dev. Change 27(1): 165-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, P. (1999). Activists beyond borders and theorists within them. Transnatl. Assoc. 51(1): 39-40. www.uia.org/uiata/kecsik.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S. S. (1969). Political theory as a vocation. Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 63(4): 1062-1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yearbook of International Organizations (2002). Union of International Associations and K. G. Saur Verlag, München, Germany.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, R. Interpreting Global Civil Society. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 13, 339–347 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022046125396

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022046125396

Navigation