Skip to main content
Log in

Gardens, Legitimation, and Resistance

  • Published:
International Journal of Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eighteenth-century garden design has been interpreted in terms of legitimation, a tool with which elites attempted to maintain power and authority over marginalized groups. But most acts of aesthetic landscaping, it can be argued, were primarily directed not towards “the poor” but to rival groups within the propertied. Similarly, any opposition to the dominant ideology expressed in the design of landscape was mainly mounted by disaffected groups within the ranks of the franchised. In so far as the poor in this period inscribed their mark upon the land, it was in acts of vandalism or reappropriation which have left little direct trace in the archaeological record.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES CITED

  • Bell, R. (1990). The discovery of a buried Georgian garden in Bath. Garden History 18(1): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermingham, A. (1987). Landscape and Ideology: The English Rustic Tradition 1740–1860, Thames and Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, C. K. (1990). Fishponds as garden features, 1550–1750. Garden History 18(1): 22–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dain, A. (1993). Assembly Rooms and Houses in Norfolk and Suffolk, Unpublished M.A. thesis, Centre of East Anglian Studies, University of East Anglia.

  • Daniels, S., and Watkins, C. (1991). Picturesque landscaping and estate management: Uvedale Price at Foxley 1770–1829. Rural History: Economy, Society, Culture 2(2): 141–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, H. (1988). Enquiry into the Causes of the Late Increase in Robbers, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girouard, M. (1978). Life in the English Country House: A Social and Architectural History, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girouard, M. (1990). The English Town, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. F. (1982). Emparking and the desertion of settlements in Hampshire. Annual Report of the Medieval Settlement Research Group 30: 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, W. M. (1992). Landscape archaeology and garden history research; success and promise at Bacon's Castle, Monticello, and Poplar Forest, Virginia. In Hunt, J. D. (ed.), Garden History: Issues, Approaches, Methods, Dunbarton Oaks, Washington, DC, pp. 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, N. (1796). General View of the Agriculture of the County of Norfolk, London.

  • Knight, R. P. (1794). The Landscape: A Didactic Poem, in Three Books Addressed to Uvedale Price Esq, London.

  • Langford, P. (1992). A Polite and Commercial People, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. (1984). Interpreting ideology in historical archaeology: the William Paca garden in Annapolis, Maryland. In Miller, D., and Tilley, C. (eds.), Ideology, Power, and Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L. (ed.). (1990). Hird's Annals of Bedale, Yorkshire Record Society, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKendrick, N., Brewer, J., and Plumb, J. H. (1982). The Birth of a Consumer Society, Europa Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munsche, P. B. (1981). Gentlemen and Poachers: The English Game Laws 1671–1831, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piebenga, S. (1994). William Sawrey Gilpin (c. 1762–1843): Picturesque improver. Garden History 22(1): 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, U. (1794). An Essay on the Picturesque, as Compared with the Sublime and the Beautiful, London.

  • Sicca, C. M. (1991). Holkham Hall. In Ford, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Guide to the Arts in Britain, Volume 5: The Augustan Age, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 148–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, K. D. M. (1983). Annals of the Laboring Poor: Social Change and Agrarian England, 1660–1900, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, D. (1957). Capability Brown, Country Life, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, D. (1962). Humphry Repton, Country Life, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1983). The Archaeology of Gardens, Shire, Aylesbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (1995). Polite Landscapes: Gardens and Society in Eighteenth-Century England, Alan Sutton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (1998). The Archaeology of the Landscape Park: Garden Design in Norfolk, England. 1660–1840, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.

  • Willis, P. (1977). Charles Bridgeman, Zwemmer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yentsch, A. E., and Kratzer, J. M. (1994). Techniques of excavating and analyzing buried eighteenth-century garden landscapes. In Millar, N., and Gleason, K. (eds.), The Archaeology of Garden and Field, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 168–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williamson, T. Gardens, Legitimation, and Resistance. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3, 37–52 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022027331626

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022027331626

Navigation