Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optical Networks Magazine, Volume 4, Number 1

  • Published:
Optical Networks Magazine

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. C. Olszewski et al., “Two-Tier Network Economics,” NFOEC, Dallas, TX, Sept. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. ITU-T Recommendation G.807/Y.1301 (2001), Requirements for the Automatic Switched Transport Network (ASTN).

  2. ITU Rec. G.8080/Y.1304, Architecture of Automatically Switched Optical Networks, Nov. 2001.

  3. ITU Rec. G.7713/Y.1704, Distributed Call and Connection Management, Nov. 2001.

  4. ITU Rec. G.7714/Y.1705, Generalized Automatic Discovery Techniques, Nov. 2001.

  5. ITU Rec. G.7712/Y.1703, Architecture and Specification of Data Communications Network, Nov. 2001.

  6. ITU-T Recommendation G.872 (1999), Architecture of optical transport networks.

  7. ITU-T Rec. G.7715/Y.1706, Architecture and Requirements for Routing in Automatically Switched Optical Networks, May 2002.

  8. IETF draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-09, Generalized MPLS-Signaling Functional Description, Oct.' 02.

  9. IETF draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-09, Generalized MPLS Signaling-RSVP-TE Extensions, Oct.' 02.

  10. IETF draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-07, Generalized MPLS Signaling-CR-LDP Extensions, Oct.' 02.

  11. IETF draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-07, GMPLS Extensions for SONET and SDH Control, Oct.' 02, Work in Progress.

  12. OIF-UNI-01.0 User Network Interface (UNI) 1.0 Signaling Specification, Oct. 2001.

References

  1. -E. Mannie (ed), “Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt, March 2002.

  2. Optical Interworking Forum, “User Network Interface (UNI) 1.0 Signaling Specification”, oif 2000. 125.6, Sept. 2001.

  3. D. Papadimitriou et al, “Optical Network-to-Network Interface Framework and Signaling Requirements”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-papadimitriou-NNI-frame-01.txt, Nov. 2000.

  4. M. Blanchet et al, “Optical BGP (OBGP): InterAS lightpath provisioning”, draft-parent-obgp-01.txt, March 2001.

  5. Y. Xu et al, “A BGP/GMPLS Solution for Inter-Domain Optical Networkings”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-xu-bgp-gmpls-01.txt, July 2001.

  6. J. Strand and Y. Xue, “Routing For Optical Networks With Multiple Routing Domains”, oif2001.046, Jan. 2001.

  7. G. Bernstein (ed.), “Inter-Domain Routing Considerations for Optical Networks”, 2001.186, July 20, 2001; see also IETF Work In Progress, draft-ietf-ipo-optical-inter-domain-00.txt, Nov. 2001.

  8. ITU-T Recommendation G.8070/Y.1301 (Approved July 2001), Requirements for the Automatic Switched Transport Network (ASTN).

  9. ITU-T Recommendation G.8080/Y.1304 (Approved Nov. 2001), Architecture of the Automatic Switched Optical Network (ASON).

  10. A. Fredette (ed.), “Optical Link Interface Requirements”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-ietf-ccampoli-reqts-00.txt, Feb. 2002.

  11. A. Saleh et al, “Proposed Extensions to the UNI for Interfacing to a Configurable All-Optical Network”, oif2000.278, Nov. 2000.

  12. A. Saleh et al, “Configurable All-Optical Networks: Reference Model and Extensions to the UNI”, oif2001.358, July 2001.

  13. D. van-Mierop et al, “Configurable All-Optical Networks Architecture Framework and Associated Requirements”, oif2001.287, May 2001.

  14. A. Chiu and J. Strand (eds.), “Impairments And Other Constraints On Optical Layer Routing”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-ietf-ipo-impairments-03, Sept. 2002; there is also an OIF version, oif2001.289, July 2001.

  15. S. Chaudhuri et al, “Control of Lightpaths in an Optical Network”, oif2000.004, Jan. 2000.

  16. M. Laser and Y. Xue (eds.), “Carrier Optical Services Framework and Associated Requirements for UNI”, oif2000.155.2, Sept. 2000; see also [17], which is an updated IETF version.

  17. Y. Xue (ed.), “Carrier Optical Services Requirements”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-ietf-ipo-carrier-requirements-00.txt, August 2001.

  18. J. Strand, “Applications Models For The NNI”, oif2001.475, Sept. 2001.

  19. M. Blanchet, “Optical BGP (OBGP): InterAS lightpath provisioning”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-parent-obgp-01.txt, March 2001.

  20. Tkach, R., Goldstein, E., Nagel, J., and Strand, J., “Fundamental Limits of Optical Transparency”, Optical Fiber Communication Conf., Feb. 1998, pp. 161-162.

  21. Ramaswami, R. and Sivarajan, K. N., Optical Networks: A Practical Perspective, Morgan Laufmann Publishers, 1998.

  22. S. Dharanikota et al, “Interdomain Routing With Shared Risk Groups”, oif2001.227.02, July 2001.

  23. L.-Z. Lu and G. Young, “NNI Path Protection Control Plane Issues”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-young-opt-nni-prot-issues-00.txt, April 2001.

  24. H.-M. Foisel, “Dual Node Interconnection of Network Domains”, oif2001.349, August 2001.

  25. A. Banerjee, A. Chiu, J. Drake, D. Blumenthal, and A. Fredette, “Impairment Constraints for Routing in All-Optical Networks”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-banerjee-routing-impairments-00.txt, Nov. 2001.

  26. L. Ceuppens, D. Bluementhal, J. Drake, J. Chrostowski, and W. Edwards, “Performance Monitoring in Photonic Networks in Support of MPL(ambda)S”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-ceuppens-mpls-optical-00.txt, Sept. 2000.

  27. D. Papadimitriou, J. P. Faure, and O. Audouin, “Nonlinear Routing Impairments in Wavelength Switched Optical Networks”, IETF Work In Progress, draft-papadimitriou-ipo-non-linear-routing-impairm-00.txt, July 2001.

  28. B. Ramamurthy, D. Datta, H. Feng, J. Heritage, and B. Mukherjee, “Impact of Transmission Impairments on the Teletraffic Performance of Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 17, No. 10, Oct. 1999.

  29. Optical Interworking Forum, “NNI 1.0 Inter-Domain Control Plane Requirements”, Liaisoned to T1X1, T1M1, and IETF, June 2002.

  30. G. Bernstein, V. Sharma, and L. Ong, “Interdomain Optical Routing”, Journal of Optical Networks, Vol. 1, No. 2, February 2002.

  31. D. Papadimitriou, “Recent Progress and Evolution for IP Over Optical Network Standards”, Optical Networks Magazine, Vol. 3, No. 3, May/June 2002.

References

  1. ITU-T Recommendation G.872, Architecture of Optical Transport Networks, ITU-T, Geneva, February, 1999 (revised version of October, 2001 to be published).

  2. ITU-T Recommendation G.709/Y.1331, Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network (OTN), ITU-T, Geneva, February, 2001.

  3. ITU-T Recommendation G.798, Characteristics of Optical Transport Network Hierarchy Equipment Functional Blocks, ITU-T, Geneva, October, 2001 (to be published).

  4. ITU-T Recommendation G.8251 (ex. G.otnjit), The Control of Jitter and Wander Within the Optical Transport Network (OTN), ITU-T, Geneva, October, 2001 (to be published).

  5. Maarten Vissers, Optical Transport Network & Optical Transport Module, Beyond SONET/SDH Conference, Paris, France, April 2002 (presentation available via ftp://sg15opticalt:otxchange@ftp.itu.int/tsg15opticaltransport/OTN/g709-intro-r2.ppt).

  6. ITU-T Recommendation G.825, The Control of Jitter and Wander within Digital Networks which are Based on the Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH), ITU-T, Geneva, March, 2000.

  7. Patrick R. Trischitta and Eve L. Varma, Jitter in Digital Transmission Systems, Artech House, Norwood, MA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sergio Benedetto, Ezio Biglieri, and Valentino Castellani, Digital Transmission Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heinrich Meyr, Marc Moeneclaey, and Stefan A. Fechtel, Digital Communication Receivers, Synchronization, Channel Estimation, and Signal Processing, Wiley, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Govind P. Agrawal, Fiber-Optic Communication Systems, Wiley, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heinrich Meyr and Gerd Ascheid, Synchronization in Digital Communications, Volume 1, Phase-, Frequency-Locked Loops, and Amplitude Control, Wiley, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dan H. Wolaver, Phase-Locked Loop Circuit Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. John C. Bellamy, Digital Network Synchronization, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 33, no. 4, April, 1995, pp. 70-83.

    Google Scholar 

  14. IEEE Draft P802.3ae/D5.0, Media Access Control (MAC) Parameters, Physical Layer, and Management Parameters for 10 Gb/s Operation, LAN MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society, May 1, 2002.

  15. ITU-T Recommendation G.783, Characteristics of Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) Equipment Functional Blocks, ITU-T, Geneva, October, 2000.

  16. Revised Draft T1 Standard T1.105.03, Synchronous Optical Network (SONET)-Jitter at Network Interfaces, Contribution to T1 Standards Project, T1X1.3/2002-007R9, Adam Wertheimer, Editor (available via http://www.t1.org)

  17. C. J. Byrne, B. J. Karifin, and D. B. Robinson, Jr., Systematic Jitter in a Chain of Digital Regenerators, Bell System Technical Journal, November, 1963, pp. 2679-2714.

  18. E. L. Varma and J. Wu, Analysis of Jitter Accumulation in a Chain of Digital Regenerators, Proceedings of IEEE Globecom, 1982, Vol. 2, pp. 653-657.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ITU-T Recommendation G.810, Definitions and Terminology for Synchronization Networks, ITU-T, Geneva, August, 1996.

  20. D. B. Sullivan, D. W. Allan, D. A. Howe, and F. L. Walls, Characterization of Clocks and Oscillators, NIST Technical Note 1337, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, March, 1990 (see, for example, section IX of paper B.1).

  21. ITU-T Recommendation G.813, Timing Characteristics of SDH Equipment Slave Clocks (SEC), ITU-T, Geneva, August, 1996.

  22. ITU-T Recommendation G.709/Y.1331, Amendment 1, Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network (OTN), ITU-T, Geneva, October, 2001 (to be published).

  23. D. B. Leeson, A Simple Model of Feedback Oscillator Noise Spectrum, Proceedings IEEE, February, 1966, pp. 329-330.

  24. ITU-T Recommendation G.803, Architecture of Transport Networks Based on the Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH), ITU-T, Geneva, June, 1997.

  25. ITU-T Recommendation G.823, The Control of Jitter and Wander within Digital Networks which are Based on the 2048 kbit/s Hierarchy, ITU-T, Geneva, February, 2000.

  26. ITU-T Recommendation G.824, The Control of Jitter and Wander within Digital Networks which are Based on the 1544 kbit/s Hierarchy, ITU-T, Geneva, February, 2000.

  27. ITU-T Recommendation G.8251, Amendment 1, The Control of Jitter and Wander within the Optical Transport Network/OTN, ITU-T, Geneva, May 2002 (to be published).

References

  1. ITU-T Recommendation G.707/Y1322 (10/2000), Network Node Interface for the Synchronous Digital Hierarchy SDH.

  2. ITU-T Recommendation G.783 (02/2001), Characteristics of Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) Equipment functional blocks.

  3. ITU-T Recommendation G.709 (02/2001), Interfaces for the optical transport network (OTN).

  4. ITU-T Recommendation G.798 (11/2001), Characteristics of OTN equipment functional blocks.

  5. ITU-T Recommendation G.7042/Y.1305 (11/2001): Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) for Virtual Concatenated Signals.

  6. ITU-T Recommendation G7041/Y.1303 (11/2001): Generic Framing Procedure (GFP).

  7. ETSI European Standard EN 300 417-9-1, Transmission and Multiplexing (TM); Generic requirements of transport functionality of equipment; Part 9: Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) concatenated path layer functions; Sub-part 1: Requirements

  8. ANSI American National Standard T1.105, Synchronous optical network (SONET)—Basic Description including Multiplex Structure, Rates and Formats.

References

  1. ITU-T Recommendation G.7041/Y.1303 (2001), The Generic Framing Procedure (GFP).

  2. ITU-T Recommendation I.432 (1993), “BISDN User-Network Interface—Physical Layer Specification”.

  3. ISO/EIC 3309:1991(E), “Information Technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—High-level data link control (HDLC) procedures—Frame structure.” International Organization for Standardization, Forth Edition, 1991.

  4. ISO/EIC 4435:1991(E), “Information Technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—High-level data link control (HDLC) procedures—Elements of procedures.” International Organization for Standardization, Forth Edition, 1991.

  5. American National Standard For Telecommunications—Synchronous Optical Network (SONET): Physical Interfaces Specifications, ANSI T1.105.06—2000.

  6. Bellcore GR-253-CORE, Issue 2, (December 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. ITU-T Recommendation G.707 (1996), “Network Node Interface for the Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH)”.

  8. ITU-T Recommendation G.709 (2001), “Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network (OTN)”.

  9. J. Carlson, P. Langner, J. Manchester, and E. Hernandez-Valencia, “The Simple Data Link (SDL) Protocol,” RFC 2823, May 2000.

  10. American National Standard For Telecommunications—Integrated Services Digital Network—Core Aspects of Frame Protocol for Use with Frame Relay Bearer Service, ANSI T1.618-1991, June 1991.

  11. W. Simpson, Editor, “PPP in HDLC-like Framing,” RFC 1662, July 1994.

  12. W. Simpson, Editor, “The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP),” RFC 1661, July 1994.

  13. A. Malis and W. Simpson, “PPP over SONET/SDH,” RFC 2615, June 1999.

  14. ITU-T Recommendation X.85 (2001), IP over SDH using LAPS.

  15. ITU-T Recommendation X.86 (2001), Ethernet over LAPS.

  16. J. Heinanen, “Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer 5,” RFC 1483, July 1993.

  17. IETF MPLS Working Group, “A Framework for Multiprotocol Label Switching.” Work in progress.

  18. D. Fiorini, M. Chiani, V. Tralli, and C. Salati. “Can we trust in HDLC”. ACM Computer Communication Review. pp. 61-80. 1994.

  19. J. Anderson, B. Doshi, S. Dravida, and J. Manchester, “IP over SONET/SDH,” IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 136-143, May 1998.

  20. IEEE 802.3, 5 Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method & Physical Layer Specifications

  21. ITU-T Recommendation G.7042/Y.1305 (2001), Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS).

References

  1. IEEE 802.1D working group, “MAC Bridges,” IEEE Std. 802.1D:1998 (ISO/IEC 15802-3)

  2. IEEE 802.1Q working group, “Virtual LANs,” IEEE Std. 802.1Q:1998

  3. IEEE 802.3 working group, “Ethernet,” ANSII/IEEE Std. 802.3-2000 (ISO/IEC 8802-3:2000)

  4. IEEE 802.1ad, “Link aggregation,” 2000.

  5. IEEE D5.0 Supplement to CSMA/DS Access Method and Physical Layer Specification—Media Access Control (MAC) Parameters, Physical Layer, and Management for 10 Gb/s Operation.

  6. “Ethernet in the First Mile,”, IEEE working group, http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/efm/index.html

  7. Bellcore, “GR-1230-CORE: SONET Bidirectinal Line-Switched Ring Equipment Generic Criteria,” 1998.

  8. S. Blake, “An Architecture for Differentiated Services,” RFC 2475, December 1998.

  9. D. Stiliadis and A. Varma, “Efficient fair queuing algorithms for packet switched networks,” IEEE/ATM Trans. Networking, Vol. 6, No. 2, April 1998.

  10. ITU-T Recommendation G.707, “Network Node Interface For The Synchronous Digital Hierarchy,” 1996.

  11. ITU-T Recommendation G.7041 (V0.4), “Generic Framing Procedure (GFP),” Draft, Oct 2001.

  12. E. Hernandez-Valencia, M. Scholten and Z. Zhu, “The generic framing procedure (GFP): an overview, IEEE Communications Mag., vol 40, no 5, pp-63-71. May, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Martini et al., “Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Ethernet Frames over IP and MPLS Networks,” http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-martini-ehternet-encap-mpls-00.txt

  14. L. Martini et al., “Transport of Layer 2 Frames Over MPLS,” IETF Internet-Draft—work in progress, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-martini-12circuit-trans-mpls-09.txt

  15. E. Rosen et al., “Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture,” IETF RFC 3031, 2001

  16. J. Moy, “OSPF Version 2,” RFC 2328 (STD 54), April 1998.

  17. D. Katz, et al., “Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF”, IETF-Internet Draft-work in progress, draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-06.txt

  18. C. Brown and A. Malis, “Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay, RFC 2427 (STD 55), Sept 1998.

  19. A.6Malis and W. Simpson, “PPP over SONET-SDH,” RFC 2615, June 1999.

  20. D. Grossman and J. Heinanen, “Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer 5,” RFC 2684, Sept. 1999.

  21. D. Awduche et al., “RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels,” RFC 3209, December 2001.

  22. S. Golestani, “A self-clocked fair queuing scheme for broadband applications,” Proc. INFOCOM' 94, April 1994.

  23. J. C. R. Bennett, and H. Zhang, “WF2Q: Worst-case fair weighted fair queuing,” Proc IEEE INFOCOM'96, March 1996.

  24. ITU-T Recommendation X.86, “Ethernet over LAPS,” February 2002.

References

  1. H. Luss, M. B. Rosenwein and R. T. Wong, “Topological Network Design for SONET Ring Architecture,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part A, Vol. 28, pp. 780-790 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fumagalli, A. Cerutti, M. Tacca, F. Masetti, R. Jagannathan and S. Alagar, “Survivable Networks Based on Optimal Routing and WDM Self-Healing Rings,” Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM' 99, March 21-25 (1999).

  3. A. Fumagalli and L. Valcarenghi, “Fast Optimization of Survivable WDM Mesh Networks Based on Multiple Self-Healing Rings,” SPIE Conference on All-Optical Networking 1999: Architecture, Control and Management Issues, Boston, MA, September 1999, SPIE Volume 3843.

  4. J. B. Slevinsky, W. D. Grover and M. H. MacGregor, “An Algorithm for Survivable Network Design Employing Multiple Self-healing Rings,” IEEE GLOBECOM. (1993).

  5. W. D. Grover, J. B. Slevinsky and M. H. MacGregor, “Optimized Design of Ring-Based Survivable Networks,” Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 20 pp. 138-149 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. R. P. White, J. W. Mann and G. D. Smith, “Genetic Algorithms and Network Ring Design,” Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 86 pp. 347-371 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. Gunluk, AT&T Labs, personal communication (2000).

References

  1. T. E. Stern, and K. Bala, Multiwavelength Optical Networks: A Layered Approach, Prentice Hall, May 1999.

  2. D. Benjamin, R. Trudel, S. Shew, and E. Kus, “Optical Services over an Intelligent Optical Network”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 73-78, September 2001.

  3. E. Varma, S. Sankaranarayanan, G. Newsome, Z. Lin, and H. Epstein, “Architecting the Services Optical Network”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 80-87, September 2001.

  4. A. McGuire, S. Mirza, and D. Freeland, “Application of Control Plane Technology to Dynamic Configuration Management”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 94-99, September 2001.

  5. “IP over Optical Networks: A Framework”, draft-ietf-ipo-framework-00.txt, IETF draft, January 2001.

  6. B. Rajagopalan, D. Pendarakis, D. Saha, S. Ramamurthy, and K. Bala, “IP over Optical Networks: Architectural Aspects”, IEEE Communications Magazine, September 2000.

  7. G. Bernstein, J. Yates, and D. Saha, “Control and Management of Optical Transport Networks”, IEEE Communications Magazine, October 2000.

  8. G. Hjálmtýsson, J. Yates, S. Chaudhuri and A. Greenberg, “Smart Routers—Simple Optics: An Architecture for the Optical Internet”, IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology, December 2000.

  9. G. Bernstein, J. Yates, and D. Saha, “IP-Centric Control and Management of Optical Transport Networks”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 161-167, October 2000.

  10. K. Sato and S. Okamoto, “Photonic Transport Technologies to Create Robust Backbone Networks”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 78-87, August 1999.

  11. “Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching Architecture”, draft-many-gmpls-architecture-00.txt, IETF draft, August 2001.

  12. “Generalized MPLS—Signaling Functional Description”, draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-05. txt, IETF draft, January 2001.

  13. “Generalized MPLS Signaling—RSVP-TE Extensions”, draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-04.txt, IETF draft, January 2001.

  14. “Link Management Protocol”, draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02.txt, IETF draft, September 2001.

  15. “OSPF version 2”, IETF RFC 2328, April 1998.

  16. “User Network Interface (UNI) 1.0 Signaling Specification”, OIF contribution OIF2000.125.6, September 2001.

  17. “Link Management Protocol (LMP) for WDM Transmission Systems”, IETF draft, June 2001.

  18. G. Ellinas, E. Bouillet, R. Ramamurthy, J. Labourdette, S. Chaudhuri, and K. Bala, “Restoration in Layered Architectures with a WDM Mesh Optical Layer”, Annual Review of Communications, International Engineering Consortium, June 2002.

  19. J. Strand, A. Chiu, and R. Tkach, “Issues for Routing in the Optical Layer”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 81-87, February 2001.

  20. Eric Bouillet, Jean-François Labourdette, Georgios Ellinas, and Ramu Ramamurthy, “Stochastic Approaches to Compute Mesh Restored Lightpaths in DWDM Optical Network Architectures”, Proc. Infocom'2002, New York City, NY, June 2002.

  21. S. Chaudhuri, R. Ramamurthy, and S. Sengupta, “Comparison of Centralized and Distributed Provisioning of Lightpaths in Optical Networks”, Proc. OFC'01, Anaheim, CA, March 2001.

  22. R. Ramamurthy, Z. Bogdanowicz, S, Samieian, D. Saha, B. Rajagopalan, S. Sengupta, S. Chaudhuri, and K. Bala, “Capacity Performance of Dynamic Provisioning in Optical Networks”, IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 19, no 1, pp. 40-48, January 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Doverspike and J. Yates, “Challenges for MPLS in Optical Network Restoration”, IEEE Communication Magazine, February 2001.

  24. C. W. Chao, P. M. Dollard, J. E. Weythman, L. T. Nguyen, and H. Eslambolchi, “FASTAR—A robust system for fast DS3 restoration”, Proc. Globecom'91, 1991.

  25. W. D. Grover, in “Distributed restoration of the transport network”, in Telecommunications Network Management into the 21st Century—Techniques, Standards, Technologies and Applications”, S. Aidarous, T. Plevyak, IEEE Press, 1994.

  26. S. Datta, S. Sengupta, S. Biswas, and S. Datta, “Efficient Channel Reservation for Backup Paths in Optical Mesh Networks”, IEEE Proc. Globecom' 01, San Antonio, TX, November 2001.

  27. R. Iraschko, M. H. MacGregor, and W. D. Grover, “Optimal Capacity Placement for Path Restoration in STM or ATM Mesh Survivable Networks”, IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 6, no 3, pp. 325-336, June 98.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. R. Iraschko, M. H. MacGregor, and W. D. Grover, “Optimal Capacity Placement for Path Restoration in Mesh Survivable Networks.” In Proc. ICC'96, pp. 1568-1574, Dallas, TX, June 1996.

  29. S. Ramamaurthy and B. Mukherjee, “Survivable WDM mesh networks. Part I—Protection”, IEEE Proc. Infocom'99, Vol. 2, pp. 744-751, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Ramamaurthy and B. Mukherjee, “Survivable WDM mesh networks. Part II—Restoration”, IEEE Proc. ICC' 99, Vol. 3, pp. 2023-2030, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. W. Suurballe, “Disjoint Paths in a Network”, Networks, Vol. 4, pp. 125-145, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Chartrand and L. Lesniak, Graphs & Digraphs, Chapman and Hall, 1996.

  33. B. Doshi, et al., “Optical Network Design and Restoration” Bell-Labs Technical Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 58-84, January-March 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Labourdette, E. Bouillet, R. Ramamurthy, G. Ellinas, S. Chaudhuri, and K. Bala, “Routing Strategies for Capacity-Efficient and Fast-Restorable Mesh Optical Networks”, Photonic Network Communications—special issue on “Routing, Protection, and Restoration Strategies and Algorithms for WDM Optical Networks”, vol. 4, no. 3/4, pp. 219-235, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Garey and D. Johnson, Computers and Intractability. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, W. H. Freeman and Company, 1979.

  36. E. Bouillet, J. Labourdette, R. Ramamurthy, and S. Chaudhuri, “Enhanced Algorithm Cost Model to Control tradeoffs in Provisioning Shared Mesh Restored Lightpaths”, Proc. OFC 2002, Anaheim, CA, March 2002.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Optical Networks Magazine, Volume 4, Number 1. Optical Networks Magazine 4, 1–116 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022026602866

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022026602866

Search

Navigation