Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic mechanism and property of a whole-arm translocation (WAT) between chromosomes 8 and 9 of agile gibbons (Hylobates agilis)

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

C-banding analysis with 47 gibbons of the subgenus Hylobates (Hylobates) (44-chromosome gibbons) uncovered that the gibbons had a characteristic complicated C-banding pattern. The C-band pattern also revealed that a whole-arm translocation (WAT) between chromosomes 8 and 9 existed only in the species H. agilis (agile gibbon). Comprehensive consideration allows postulation that the translocation seemed to be restricted to two subspecies: H. agilis agilis (mountain agile gibbon) and H. agilis unko (lowland agile gibbon), found in Sumatra and part of the Malay Peninsula. Moreover, combined intensive analyses of C-banding and chromosome painting provided strong evidence for a plausible evolutionary pathway of chromosome differentiation of chromosomes 8 and 9. The C-banded morph 8Mt/c seemed to be the primary type of chromosome 8 in the subgenus and to have altered into the three morphs through three pericentric inversions. The newest morph (8AM/ci) produced by the third inversion exchanged the long arm for chromosome 9, and subsequently constructed the WAT morphs of 8/9AMc/ct and 9/8Mi/ci.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballou J, Ralls K( 1982) Inbreeding and juvenile mortality in small populations of ungulates: a detailed analysis. Biol Conserv 24: 239-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benirschke K, Kumamoto AT (1991) Mammalian cytogenetics and conservation of species. J Hered 82: 187-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geissman T (1995) Gibbon systematics and species identification. Int Zoo News 42: 467-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves C (2001) Primate Taxonomy.Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai H (2001) Relationship of telomere sequence and constitutive heterochromatin in the human and apes as detected by PRINS. Meth Cell Sci 23: 29-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai H, Hasegawa Y, Kawamoto Y, Tokita E (1998) Tandem duplication of nucleolus organizer region (NOR) in the Japanese macaque, Macaca fuscata fuscata. Chromosome Res 6: 191-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai H, Taguchi T, Godwin AK(1999) Genomic differentiation of 18S ribosomal DNA and β-satellite DNA in the hominoid and its evolutionary aspects. Chromosome Res 7: 531-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai H, Hirai Y, Kawamoto Y, Endo H, Kimura J, Rerkamnuaychoke W (2002) Cytogenetic differentiation of two sympatric tree shrew taxa found in the southern part of the Isthmus of Kra. Chromosome Res 10: 313-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai HT (1991) Mutability of constitutive heterochromatin (C-bands) during eukaryotic chromosome evolution and their cytological meaning. Jpn J Genet 66: 635-661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai HT, Satta Y, Takahata N (2001) Integrative study on chromosome evolution of mammals, ants and wasps based on the minimum interaction theory. J Theor Biol 210: 475-497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch A, Weinberg J, Stanyon R et al. (1992) Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 8611-8615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler U, Arnold N, Wienberg J, Tofanelli S, Stanyon R (1995) Genomic reorganization and disrupted chromosomal synteny in the siamang (Hylobates syndactylus) revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Am J Phys Anthropol 97: 37-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze B, Weichenhan D, Virks P, Traut W, Winking H (1996) Copy numbers of a clustered long-range repeat determine C-band staining. Ctyogenet Cell Genet 73: 86-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1979) Effective deme sizes during long-term evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement. Evolution 33: 234-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J, Sugardjito J (1986) Gibbon systematics. In: Swindler DR, Erwin J, eds. Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 1: Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy New York: Alan R. Liss, pp 137-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mootnick AR (in press) Gibbon taxonomy to be utilized for rescue centers. In: Galdikas BMF, Briggs NE, Sheeran LK, Shapiro GL, Goodall J, eds. All apes Great and Small, Vol: Asian Apes.NewYork: KluwerAcademic/PlenumPublishers.

  • Nie W, Rens W, Wang J, Yang F (2001) Conserved chromosome segments in Hylobates hoolock revealed by human and H. leucogenys paint probes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 92: 248-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prouty LA, Buchanan PD, Pollitzer WS, Mootnick AR (1983) Bunopithecus: a genus-level taxon for the hoolock gibbon (Hylobates hoolock). Am J Primatol 5: 83-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos C, Geissmann T (2001) Molecular phylogeny of the major hylobatid divisions. Mol Phyl ogenet Evol 19: 486-494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiqing L, Liming S, Yuze C (1987) A study on the chromosomes of white-browed gibbon (Hylobates hoolock leuconedys). Acta Theriologica Sinica 7: 1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanyon R, Chiarelli B (1983) Mode and tempo in primate chromosome evolution: implications for Hylobatid phylogeny. J Hum Evol 12: 305-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanyon R, Sineo L, Chiarelli B et al. (1987) Banded karyotypes of the 44-chromosome gibbons. Folia Primatol 48: 56-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75: 304-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantravahi R, Dev VD, Firschein IL, Miller DA, Miller OJ (1975) Karyotype of the gibbons Hylobates lar and H. moloch, inversion in chromosome 7. Cytogenet Cell Genet 15: 92-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjia HD (1980) The Sunda Shelf, Southeast Asia. Z Geomorphol 24: 405-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • vanTuinen P, Ledbetter DH (1983) Cytogenetic comparison and phylogeny of three species of Hylobatidae. Am J Phys Anthropol 61: 453-466.

    Google Scholar 

  • vanTuinen P, Mootnick AR, Kingswood SC, Hale DW, Kumamoto AT (1999) Complex, compound inversion/ translocation polymorphism in an ape: presumptive intermediate stage in the karyotipic evolution of the agile gibbon Hylobates agilis. Am J Phys Anthropol 110: 129-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voris HK( 2000) Maps of Pleistocene sea levels in southern Asia: shorelines, river systems and time durations. J Biogeog 27: 1153-1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • White MJD (1973) Animal Cytol ogy and Evolution, 3rd edn. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wienberg J, Stanyon R, Jauch A, Cremer T (1992) Homologies in human and Macaca fuscata chromosomes revealed by in situ suppression hybridization with human chromosome specific DNA libraries. Chromosoma 101: 265-270.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirai, H., Mootnick, A.R., Takenaka, O. et al. Genetic mechanism and property of a whole-arm translocation (WAT) between chromosomes 8 and 9 of agile gibbons (Hylobates agilis). Chromosome Res 11, 37–50 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022006015379

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022006015379

Navigation