Abstract
Suspected perpetrators may attempt to influence the professional's recognition and reporting of child abuse by providing an account that explains or justifies their behavior or the child's injury. A factorial survey design was employed in which a random sample of nurses (N = 1038) judged vignettes that included systematic variations of types of accounts and selected case characteristics. In comparison to the other characteristics of the case, perpetrator accounts had little impact on nurses recognition and reporting of child abuse. Only two types of accounts influenced the nurses' responses, and from the perspective of the suspected perpetrator they backfired, resulting in greater recognition and reporting of abuse. Interaction terms constructed of accounts and situational variables had little impact on nurses' judgments when sexual abuse was involved, but resulted in both higher and lower recognition and reporting scores when physical and emotional acts were judged.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys, Wiley, New York.
Besharov, D. J. (1993). Overreporting and underreporting are twin problems. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence Sage, Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 257–272.
Ferraro, K. J., and Johnson, J. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Probl. 30: 325–339.
Finkelhor, D. (1993). The main problem is still underreporting, not overreporting. In Gelles, R. J., and Loeke, D. R. (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 273–287.
Garrett, K. (1982). Child abuse: Problems of definition. In Rossi, P. H., and Nock, S. (eds.), Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 177–204.
Gelles, R. J., and Straus, M. A. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., and Reiss, I. L. (eds.), Contemporary Theories About the Family, Free Press, New York, NY, pp. 549–581.
Gelles, R. J. (1982). Problems in defining and labeling child abuse. In Starr, R. H. (ed.). Child Abuse Prediction: Policy Implications, Ballinger Publishing Co, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–30.
Giovannoni, J. M., and Becerra, R. M. (1979). Defining Child Abuse, Free Press, New York.
Giovannoni, J. (1989). Definitional issues in child maltreatment. In Cicchetti, D., and Carlson, V. (eds.), Child Maltreatment: Theory and Research on the Causes and Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp. 3–37.
Herzberger, S., and Tennen, H. (1988). Applying the label of physical abuse. In Hotaling, G. T., Kirkpatrick, J. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.), Coping with Family Violence: Research and Policy Perspectives, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 18–30.
Hewitt, J. P., and Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. Am. Sociological Rev. 40: 1–11.
Margolin, L. (1990). When vocabularies of motive fail: The example of fatal child abuse. Qual. Sociol. 13: 373–385.
Margolin, L. (1992). Deviance on record: Techniques for labeling child abusers in official documents. Social Probl. 39: 58–70.
Mileski, M. (1971). Courtroom encounters: An observational study of a lower criminal court. Law Soc. Rev. 5: 473–538.
Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. Am. Sociological Rev., 5: 904–913.
Newberger, E. H., and Hyde, Jr., J. H. (1975). Child abuse: Principals and implications of current pediatric practice. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 22: 695–715.
Nichols, L. (1990). Reconceptualizing social accounts: An agenda for theory building and empirical research. Social Theory, 10: 113–144.
O'Leary, K. D. (1993). Through a psychological lens: Personality traits, personality disorders, and levels of family violence. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 7–30.
O'Toole, R. E., Turbett, J. P., and Nalepka, C. (1983). Theories, professional knowledge, and diagnosis of child abuse. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.), The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 349–362.
O'Toole, R. E., and Webster, S. W. (1988). Differentiation of family mistreatment: Similarities and differences by status of the victim. Dev. Behav. 9: 347–386.
O'Toole, A. W., O'Toole, R., Webster, S., and Lucal, B. (1993). Nurses' recognition and reporting of child abuse: A factorial survey. Dev. Behav. 14: 341–363.
O'Toole, A. W., O'Toole, R., Webster, S., and Lucal, B. (1994). Nurses' responses to child abuse: A factorial survey. J. Interpers. Viol. 9: 194–206.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research, Holt, Rineholt, and Winston, New York.
Rossi, P. H., and Anderson, A. B. (1982). The factorial survey approach. In Rossi, P. H., and Nock, S. L. (eds.), Measuring Social Judgments, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 15–67.
Rossi, P., and Weber-Burdin, E. (1983). Sexual harassment on the campus. Social Sci. Res. 12: 131–158.
Scott, M. B., and Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. Am. Sociological Rev. 33: 46–62.
Scully, D., and Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists' vocabulary of motives: Excuses and justifications. Social Probl. 31: 530–544.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Doubleday, Garden City.
Sykes, G., and Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. Am. Sociological Rev. 22: 664–670.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1988). Study findings: National study of the incidence and severity of child abuse and neglect, DHHS Pub. No. (OHDS) 81: 30325, Washington, DC, DHHS.
Valentine, D. P., Acuff, D. S., Freeman, M. L., and Andres, T. (1984). Defining child maltreatment: A multidisciplinary overview. Child Welf. 63: 497–509.
Webster, S. W. (1991). Defining family mistreatment: A community survey. In Knudsen, D., and Miller, J. (eds.), Abused and Battered: Social and Legal Responses to Family Violence, Free Press, New York, NY, pp. 49–61.
Wiehe, V. R. (1990). Sibling Abuse, Lexington Books, Lexington.
Yllo, K. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 47–62.
Zellman, G. L. (1992). The impact of case characteristics on child abuse reporting decisions. Child Abuse Negl. 16: 57–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O'Toole, R., O'Toole, A.W., Webster, S. et al. Influence of Perpetrators' Account on Nurses' Recognition and Reporting of Child Abuse. Journal of Family Violence 12, 49–62 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021993800173
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021993800173