Skip to main content

Sensitivity Analysis of the GIUH based Clark Model for a Catchment


For estimation of runoff response of an ungauged catchment resulting from a rainfall event, geomorphologicalinstantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) approach is getting popularbecause of its direct application to an ungauged catchment. Itavoids adoption of tedious methods of regionalization of unithydrograph; wherein, the historical rainfall-runoff data of anumber of gauged catchments are required to be analyzed. In thisstudy, the GIUH derived from geomorphological characteristics ofa catchment has been related to the parameters of Clark IUH modelfor deriving its complete shape. The DSRO hydrographs estimatedby the GIUH based Clark model have been compared with the DSROhydrographs computed by the Clark IUH model option of the HEC-1package and the Nash IUH model by employing some of the commonlyused error functions. Sensitivity analysis of the GIUH basedClark model has been conducted with the objective to identify thegeomorphological and other model parameters which are moresensitive in estimation of peak of unit hydrographs computed bythe GIUH based Clark model. So that these parameters may beevaluated with more precision for accurate estimation of floodhydrographs for the ungauged catchments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Bhaskar, N. R., Parida, B. P. and Nayak, A. K.: 1997, ‘Flood estimation for ungauged catchments using the GIUH’ J. Water Resour. Plann. and Manage. 123, ASCE.

  2. Chow, V. T. (ed.): 1964, Hand book of Applied Hydrology, McGraw Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, C. O.: 1945, ‘Storage and the unit hydrograph’ Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 110, 1419–1446.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haan, C. T.: 1996, ‘Uncertainty analysis of hydrologic and water quality models’ Lecture Notes.

  5. HEC-1: 1990, Flood Hydrograph Package, User's Manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydro-logic Engineering Center, Davis, CA 95616.

  6. Horton, R. E.: 1945, ‘Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology’ Bull. Geo. Soc. Am. 56, 275–370.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nash, J. E.: 1957, ‘The form of instantaneous unit hydrograph’ Int. Assn. of Sci. and Hydrol., Pub. 1 45(3), 114–121.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. and Valdes, J. B.: 1979, ‘The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response’ Water Resour. Res. 15(6), 1409–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Gonzalas Sonabria, M. and Bras, R. C.: 1982, ‘The Geomorpho-climatic theory of the instantaneous unit hydrograph’ Water Resour. Res. 18(4), 877–886.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosso, R.: 1984, ‘Nash model relation to Horton order ratios’ Water Resour. Res. 20, 914–920.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Strahler, A. N.: 1957, ‘Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology’ Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 38, 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zelazinski, J.: 1986, ‘Application of the geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph theory to development of forecasting models in Poland’ Hydrol. Sci. J. 31(2), 6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rakesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, R., Chatterjee, C., Lohani, A.K. et al. Sensitivity Analysis of the GIUH based Clark Model for a Catchment. Water Resources Management 16, 263–278 (2002).

Download citation

  • Clark IUH model
  • geographical informationsystem
  • geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph
  • geomorphological parameters
  • HEC-1 package
  • Nash IUH model
  • relative sensitivity