Abstract
The commodification of pottery cannot be reduced to strict econo-technological terms. Commodification is a cultural process, enmeshed in local, regional, and international systems of meaning. As Victorian Modernism eroded, anti-modern movements commodified “traditional” culture. These philosophies, themselves commodities, had repercussions on the pottery industry throughout the world. In both America and Australia, these processes produced art and studio potteries. In the American Great Basin, these changes were experienced very differently by potters from different cultures. The commodification and industrialization of modern pottery factories predicated the reification of a pre-industrial artisanal past.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES CITED
Anonymous. (1863). Virginia Pottery. Virginia Evening Bulletin, 3 August, 3:1.
Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 3–63.
Baldwin, C. (1996). Fragile Legacy, Unpublished manuscript in the possession of the author.
Browne, J. R. (1869). Resources of the Pacific Slope, D. Appleton, New York.
Clark, G. (1979). A Century of Ceramics in the United States, 1878–1978, E. P. Dutton, New York.
Evans, P. (1987). Art Pottery of the United States, Feingold and Lewis, New York.
Harrington, L. (1979). Ceramics in the Pacific Northwest: A History, University of Washington Press, Seattle.
Hughes, T. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 3–63.
Lears, T. J. J. (1981). No Place of Grace: Antimodernism and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880–1920, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Pafaffenberger, B. (1992). Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 491–516.
Timms, P. (1986). Australian Studio Pottery and China Painting, Oxford University Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scarlett, T.J. Narcissus's Mirror: Manufacture and Modernism in the American Great Basin—The Case of Pottery. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3, 167–175 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021910019795
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021910019795