Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Waiting for the Doctor: Gender Differences in the Timing of an Intervention by the Occupational Physician

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to answer the question whether the relatively high inflow risk into disability for women, compared to that for men, is related to a lower chance of being called by the occupational physician during sickness absence. This chance is influenced by sociodemographic, health-related, and work-related factors, as well as by the duration of sickness absence. Using a proportional hazards model, the “risk” of being called by the physician within a certain time period (the so-called hazard rate) is estimated. Kaplan–Meier curves show a gender difference in the hazard rate. Women appear to have a higher chance of being called by the occupational physician (i.e., a shorter waiting time). The influence of the covariates on the hazard rate is estimated using a Weibull model. The Weibull estimations show a negative duration dependence for women, while for men there is no duration dependence. It is concluded that the higher chance for women to be called by the occupational physician is not associated with a gender difference in treatment. Rather, it is the result of a difference in underlying characteristics. Underlying characteristics that significantly predict the waiting time for the occupational physician are in particular related to the labor market position of the employee: educational qualifications, firm size, industry, occupational workload, and job tenure. Other significant predictors are duration and diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Cuelenaere B, Veerman TJ, Prins R, Giezen AMvd. In Distant mirrors. Work incapacity and return to work. Zoetermeer: College van Toezicht Sociale Verzekeringen, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Landelijk Instituut Sociale Verzekeringen. Trendrapportage Arbeids(on)geschiktheid. Amsterdam: Landelijk Instituut Sociale Verzekeringen, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Einerhand MGK, Knol G, Prins R, Veerman TJ. Sickness and invalidity arrangements. Facts and figures from six European countries. Den Haag: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adviescommissie Arbeidsongeschiktheid. Werk maken van arbeidsgeschiktheid. Den Haag: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid, 2001.

  5. Vinke H, Andriessen S, Heuvel SGvd, Houtman ILD, Rijnders S, Vuuren CVv, Wevers CWJ. Vrouwen en reïntegratie. Hoofddorp: TNO Arbeid, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delft MLE. Sociale atlas van de vrouw. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shrey DE. Worksite disability management model for effective return-to-work planning. Occup Med State Art Rev, 2000; 15(4): 789–801.

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Vos EL, Wevers CWJ. Aan de slag met een arbeidshandicap: internationale ervaringen. Amsterdam: Landelijk Instituut Sociale Verzekeringen, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akabas SH, Gates LB, Galvin DE. Disability management. A complete system to reduce costs, increase productivity, meet employee needs, and ensure legal compliance. New York: AMACOM, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shrey DE. Disability management in industry: The new paradigm in injured worker rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 1996; 18(8): 408–414.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shrey DE, Lacerte M. Principles and practices of disability management in industry. Florida: CRC Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crook J, Moldofsky H. The probability of recovery and return to work from disability as a function of time. Qual Life Res, 1994; 3(ppl. 1): s97-s109.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meershoek A. Weer aan het werk. Verzekeringsgeneeskundige verzuimbegeleiding als onderhandeling over verantwoordelijkheden, in Vakgroep Gezondheidsethiek en Wijsbegeerte. Maastricht, Netherlands: Maastricht University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaiser CP. Het verzekeringsgeneeskundig handelen en de verzuimduur. Maastricht, Netherlands: Universiteit Maastricht, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Griffin WA. Assessing state changes in microsocial interaction: An introduction to event-history analysis. In: Mordechai Gottman J, ed. The analysis of change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 309–337.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heckman JJ. Statistical models for discrete panel data. In: Manski CF, McFadden DL, eds. Structural analysis of discrete data and econometric applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981, pp. 114–142.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schröer CAP. Ziekteverzuim wegens overspanning: een onderzoek naar de aard van overspanning, de hulpverlening en het verzuimbeloop. Maastricht, Netherlands: Universiteit Maastricht, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Delft MLEv. Sociale atlas van de vrouw. Rijswijk, Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glebbeek AC. Perspectieven op loopbanen. Groningen, Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beek KWHv. To be hired or not to be hired, the employer decides. Relative chances of unemployed job-seekers on the dutch labor market. Den Haag: Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gründemann RWM, Nijboer ID. WAO-intrede en werkhervatting. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1998. P. 302.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Molenaar-Cox PGM, Fiseler JG, Stelt HGvd, Smaal M, Kers WC. Databoek PES3. Amsterdam: GAK/GMD, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yamaguchi K. Event history analysis. (Applied social research methods series). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blossfeld HP, Hamerle A, Mayer KU. Event history analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Trussell J, Richards T. Correcting for unmeasured heterogeneity in hazard models using the Heckman-Singer procedure. In: Tuma N, ed. Sociological methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1985, pp. 242–276.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lancaster T. Econometric methods for the duration of unemployment.Econometrica 1979; 47(4): 939–956.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cuelenaere B, Molenaar-Cox P, Brummelen Yv. Begeleiding van mannen en vrouwen in het eerste ziektejaar. Amsterdam: LISV, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joling, C., Groot, W. & Janssen, P.P. Waiting for the Doctor: Gender Differences in the Timing of an Intervention by the Occupational Physician. J Occup Rehabil 13, 45–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021897807592

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021897807592

Navigation