Five questionnaire studies asked women to rate the attractiveness of outline drawings of male figures that varied in somatotype, body proportions, symmetry, and in distribution of trunk hair. In Study 1, back-posed figures of mesomorphic (muscular) somatotypes were rated as most attractive, followed by average, ectomorphic (slim), and endomorphic (heavily built) figures by both British and Sri Lankan women. In Study 2, computer morphing of somatotypes to produce an intergraded series resulted in a graded response in terms of perceived attractiveness which mirrored the findings of Study 1. In Study 3, back-posed figures were manipulated in order to change waist-to-hip ratios (WHR) and waist-to-shoulder ratios (WSR). A WHR of 0.8–0.9 and a WSR of 0.6 were rated as most attractive and these effects were more pronounced when modeling mesomorphic figures. In Study 4, symmetric figures of a mesomorphic somatotype were rated as less attractive than a normal (asymmetric) version of the same man. Study 5 showed that presence of trunk hair had a marked, positive effect upon women's ratings of attractiveness for both mesomorphic and endomorphic male figures. Women also judged figures with trunk hair as being older and they consistently rated endomorphic figures as being older than mesomorphs. These results are consistent with effects of sexual selection upon visual signals that advertise health, physical prowess, age, and underlying endocrine condition in the human male.
Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.
Bolonchuk, W. W., Siders, W. A., Lykken, G. I., & Lukaski, H. C. (2000). Association of dominant somatotype of men with body structure, function during exercise, and nutritional assessment. American Journal of Human Biology, 12, 167–180.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Collins, S. A. (2000). Men's voices and women's choices. Animal Behavior, 60, 773–780.
Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes, and human beings. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, B. J. (1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. In J. H. Barlow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby, (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267–288). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242.
Katzmarzyk, P. T., Malina, R. M., Song, T. M. K., & Bouchard, C. (1998). Somatotype and indicators of metabolic fitness in youth. American Journal of Human Biology, 10, 341–350.
Katzmarzyk, P. T., Malina, R. M., Song, T. M. K., Theriault, G., & Bouchard, C. (1998). Physique and echocardiographic dimension in children, adolescents and young adults. Annals of Human Biology, 25, 145–157.
Lynch, S. M., & Zellner, D. A. (1999). Figure preferences in two generations of men: The use of figure drawings illustrating differences in muscles mass. Sex Roles, 40, 833–843.
Maisey, D. S., Vale, E. L. E., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovée, M. J. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. Lancet 353, 1500.
Mealey, L. (1997). Bulking up: The roles of sex and sexual orientation as attempts to manipulate physical attractiveness. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 223–228.
Möller, A. P., & Hoglund, J. (1991). Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather adornments: Implications for models not sexual selection. Procedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 245, 1–5.
Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (2001). Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 302–311.
Parsons, P. A. (1992). Fluctuating asymmetry: A biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress. Heredity, 68, 361–364.
Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lipowicz, A. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature 403, 156.
Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B., Burt, D. M., et al. (2001). Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male sexual attractiveness. Procedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 268, 617–1623.
Perret, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.
Schultze, S., Knussmann, R., & Christiansen, K. (1991). Male sex role identification and body build. Homo, 42, 203–215.
Sheldon, W. H., Dupertuis, C. W., & McDermott, E. (1954). Atlas of men. New York: Harpers.
Sheldon, W. H., & Tucker, W. B. (1940). The varieties of human physique. New York: Harpers.
Singh, D. (1993). Body shape and women's attractiveness. Human Nature, 4, 297–321.
Singh, D., & Luis, S. (1995). Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgement of women's attractiveness. Human Nature, 6, 51–65.
Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgements of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.
Swaddle, J. P. (1996). Reproductive success and symmetry in zebra finches. Animal Behavior, 51, 203–210.
Swaddle, J. P., & Cuthill, I. C. (1994). Female zebra finches prefer symmetric males. Nature, 367, 165–166.
Swaddle, J. P., & Cuthill, I. C. (1995). Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: Symmetry may not always be beautiful. Procedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 261, 111–116.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5, 297–302.
Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1996). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behavior, 50, 1601–1615.
Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornellisen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female sexual attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 266, 211–218.
Van Valen, L. (1962). A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution, 16, 125–142.
About this article
Cite this article
Dixson, A.F., Halliwell, G., East, R. et al. Masculine Somatotype and Hirsuteness as Determinants of Sexual Attractiveness to Women. Arch Sex Behav 32, 29–39 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021889228469
- human male
- sexual attractiveness
- sexual selection