Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the structural heterogeneity of urban areas: an example from the Black Country (UK)

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing acknowledgement of the importance of urban habitats in the maintenance of biodiversity has brought with it a need to quantify this importance at a scale appropriate to the characteristic patch sizes encountered in urban areas. Taking a study area in the Black Country (UK) we used a spatially complete, rapid assessment method to evaluate habitat patches in terms of their internal structural heterogeneity. This method recognises the importance of both natural and anthropogenic processes in providing a diverse range of habitats and niches for both flora and fauna. It also recognises the key role of context in determining the ecological significance of each patch within the urban landscape.

All habitats studied had a complex mix of both natural and artificial structural elements, where an element is a within-patch contributor to structural diversity, with each habitat type having a large range of element totals. Characteristic totals, reflecting the level of habitat structural diversity, were observed in some habitat types with residential areas having high values and industrial and commercial areas having low values. Certain structural elements were also associated with each habitat type allowing characteristic element assemblages to be derived. If structural diversity is linked with biodiversity, as seems to be the case in many (though not all) habitat types, then this unique method of viewing the urban landscape becomes a powerful tool for informing wildlife ecologists, nature conservationists, urban planners, environmental managers and landscape architects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agger, P. and Brandt, J. (1988) Dynamics of small biotopes in Danish agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology 1(4), 227-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpert, P. (1991) Microtopography as habitat structure for mosses on rocks. In Habitat Structure: The Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space (S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy and H.R. Mushinsky, eds.), pp. 120-140. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, G.M.A. (1997) A framework for the future: green networks with multiple uses in and around towns and cities. English Nature Research Report, no. 256, English Nature, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichlmeier, F., Brunner, M., Patsch, J., Mück, H. and Wenisch, E. (1980) Biotope mapping in the city of Augsberg. Garten und Landschaft 7/80, pp. 551-559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, V.K. (1991) The effects of changes in habitat structure during succession in terrestrial communities. In Habitat Structure: The Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space (S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy and H.R. Mushinsky, eds.), pp. 141-168. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. and Lane, A. (1993) Practical Conservation—Urban Habitats. Hodder and Stoughton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cueto, V.R. and de Casenave, J.L. (1999) Determinants of species richness: role of climate and vegetation structure at a regional scale. Journal of Biogeogaphy 26, 487-492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman, C.R. (1987) Habitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban environment. Journal of Applied Ecology 24, 337-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flather, C.H., Brady, S.J. and Inkley, D.B. (1992) Regional habitat appraisals of wildlife communities: a landscape-level evaluation of a resource planning model using avian distribution data. Landscape Ecology 7(2), 137-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, O.L. (1989) The Ecology of Urban Habitats. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, P.B. and Dennis, R.L.H. (1999) The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 1261-1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (1996) Planning for a green environment in Birmingham. In Managing a Conurbation: Birmingham and it's Region (A.J. Gerrard and T.R. Slater, eds.), pp. 90-100. Brewin Books, Studely.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M., Stevens, R.A. and Zhang, L. (1999) Urban plant ecology patterns and processes: a case study of the flora of the City of Plymouth, Devon, U.K. Journal of Biogeography 26, 1281-1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, P. (1992) Habitat Management for Invertebrates: A Practical Handbook. RSPB, Sandy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleyer, M. (1994) Habitat network schemes in Stuttgart. In Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks (E.A. Cook and H.N van Lier, eds.), pp. 249-272. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotzageorgis, G.C. and Mason, C.F. (1997) Small mammal populations in relation to hedgerow structure in an arable landscape. Journal of Zoology 242, 425-434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunick, W. (1980) Plants to which special attention should be paid when mapping urban areas. Garten und Landschaft 7/80, 577-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaGro Jr., J.A. and DeGloria, S.D. (1992) Land use dynamics within an urbanizing non-metropolitan county in New York State (USA). Landscape Ecology 7(4), 275-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, R.K. and Rees, W.E. (1979) Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57, 2358-2368.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J. (1997) A paradigm shift. Urban Ecosystems 1(2), 85-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along rural-urban gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71(4), 1232-1237.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C., Parmelee, R.W., Carreiro, M.M. and Medley, K. (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1(1), 21-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, U., Peschel, T. and Schmitz, S. (2000) The flora of selected urban land-use types in Berlin and Potsdam with regard to nature conservation in cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 46, 209-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Conservancy Council (1990) Handbook for Phase-1 Habitat Survey—A Technique for Environmental Audit. N.C.C., Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. (1991) The Ecology of a Garden: The First Fifteen Years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plachter, H. (1980) Animal populations in built up areas, and their inclusion within the context of biotope mapping. Garten und Landschaft 7/80, 569-576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomarol, M. (1996) Artificial nest structure design and management implications for the lesser kestrel Falco naumanni. Journal of Raptor Research 30(3), 169-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P. (1998) Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. Journal of Biogeography 25, 155-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, D.A. (1977) A Nature Conservation Review. University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, S.J. and Coulson, J.C. (1997) The distribution and abundance of Larus gulls nesting on buildings in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study 44(1), 13-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, P., Verboom, J.P., Knaapen, J.P. and van Apeldoorn, R.C. (1996) Dispersal and habitat connectivity in complex heterogeneous landscapes: an analysis with a GIS-based random walk model. Ecography 19, 97-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott, P. (1998) Biogeography and ecology in crisis: the urgent need for a new metalanguage. Journal of Biogeography 25, 1-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp, H. and Weiler, S. (1988) Biotope mapping and nature conservation strategies in urban areas of the Federal Republic of Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 15, 39-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonteri, T. and Haila, Y. (1990) Plants in a Boreal city: ecological characteristics of vegetation in Helsinki and it's surroundings, southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 27, 337-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz, G.W. (1991) Habitat structure and spider foraging. In Habitat Structure: The Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space (S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy and H.R. Mushinsky, eds.), pp. 325-348. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, F., Ceroni, M. and Mazza, A. (1996) A GIS-based method for multi-objective evaluation of park vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning 35, 203-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D.A. and Walker, M.D. (1991) History and pattern of disturbance in Alaskan Arctic terrestrial ecosystems: a hierarchical approach to analysing landscape change. Journal of Applied Ecology 28, 244-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, R. and Schreiber, K.-F. (1983) A quick method for assessing the importance of open spaces in towns for urban nature conservation. Biological Conservation 26, 57-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P.A. and Samways, M.J. (1991) Landscape element pattern and continuity of butterfly flight paths in an ecologically landscaped botanic garden, Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 58, 149-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, C.H. and Jarvis, P.J. (2001) A simple method for predicting the consequences of land-management in urban habitats. Environmental Management 28(3), 375-387.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Applied Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, UK, WV1 1SB

    Christopher H. Young & Peter J. Jarvis

Authors
  1. Christopher H. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter J. Jarvis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, C.H., Jarvis, P.J. Assessing the structural heterogeneity of urban areas: an example from the Black Country (UK). Urban Ecosystems 5, 49–69 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021877618584

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021877618584

Search

Navigation