Abstract
Since the early 1970s, the major American parties have moved from general consensus on women's rights issues to sharp polarization. While previous efforts to explain this realignment have identified pieces of the puzzle, these explanations have been generally incomplete and atheoretical. I argue that party positions are determined by the perceived value of specific issue positions for maintaining and expanding the party's coalition of electoral support. Thus, changes in both the composition of the party's coalition and the way the issue is defined and understood can bring about changes in the issue positions adopted by parties. Using the Convention Delegate Studies (1972–1992), this research suggests that both replacement (coalition change) and in the case of Democrats, conversion (caused by issue change) have been important mechanisms for bringing about party realignment on women's rights. This explanation both encompasses causal factors highlighted by previous scholars and points to other important contributing causes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, Greg (1997). Abortion: evidence of issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science 41: 718–37.
Andersen, Kristi (1979). The Creation of a Democratic Majority, 1928-1936. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Asher, Herbert B., and Weisberg, Herbert F. (1978). Voting change in congress: some dynamic perspectives on an evolutionary process. American Journal of Political Science 22: 391–425.
Baer, Denise L., and Bositis, David A. (1988). Elite Cadres and Party Coalitions: Representing the Public in Party Politics. New York: Greenwood Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Beck, Paul Allen (1974). A socialization theory of partisan realignment. In Richard G. Niemi (ed.), The Politics of Future Citizens. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Budge, Ian, and Hofferbert, Richard I. (1990). Mandates and policy outputs: U.S. party platforms and federal expenditures. American Political Science Review 84(March): 111–131.
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A. (1989). Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Costain, Anne N. (1991). After Reagan: new party attitudes toward gender. Annals of the American Academy 515: 114–125.
Costain, Anne N. (1992). Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women's Movement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Davis, Flora (1991). Moving the Mountain: The Women's Movement in America since 1960. New York: Simon &Schuster.
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
Erikson, Robert S. and Tedin, Kent L. (1981). The 1928-1936 partisan realignment: the case for the conversion hypothesis. American Political Science Review 75(December): 951–962.
Freeman, Jo (1975). The Politics of Women's Liberation: A Case Study of an Emerging Social Movement and Its Relation to the Policy Process. New York: David McKay Company.
Freeman, Jo (1986). The political culture of the Democratic and Republican parties. Political Science Quarterly 101: 327–356.
Freeman, Jo (1987). Whom you know versus whom you represent: feminist influence in the Democratic and Republican parties. In Mary Fainsod Katzenstein and Carol M. Mueller (eds.), The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Freeman, Jo (1993). Feminism vs. family values: women at the 1992 Democratic and Republican conventions. PS: Political Science and Politics 26: 21–28.
Freeman, Jo (2000). A Room at a Time: How Women Entered Party Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman &Littlefield.
Hartmann, Susan M. (1989). From Margin to Mainstream: American Women and Politics Since 1960. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Herrera, Richard (1995). The crosswinds of change: sources of change in the Democratic and Republican parties. Political Research Quarterly 48(June): 291–312.
Herrera, Richard, and Miller, Warren E. (1995). Convention Delegate Study, 1992 [Computer file]. Conducted by Richard Herrera and Warren E. Miller, Arizona State University. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
Key, V. O., Jr. (1955). A theory of critical elections. Journal of Politics 17(February): 3–18.
Key, V. O., Jr. (1959). Secular realignment and the party system. Journal of Politics 21(May): 198–210.
Klatch, Rebecca E. (1987). Women of the New Right. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Krukones, Michael G. (1984). Promises and Performances: Presidential Campaigns as Policy Predictor. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Larsen, Richard J. and Marx, Morris L. (1986). An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and Its Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Luker, Kristin (1984). Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Maisel, L. Sandy (1993-1994). The platform-writing process: candidate-centered platforms in (1992). Political Science Quarterly 108(Winter): 671–698.
Mansbridge, Jane J. (1986). Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Martin, Andrew D. and Wolbrecht, Christina (2000). Partisanship and pre-floor behavior: the equal rights and school prayer amendments. Political Research Quarterly 53(December): 711–720.
Melich, Tanya (1996). The Republican War Against Women: An Insider's Report from Behind the Lines. New York: Bantam Books.
Miller, Warren E. (1988). Without Consent: Mass-Elite Linkages in Presidential Politics. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Miller, Warren E., Donavan, Elizabeth, Crotty, William, and Kirkpatrick, Jane (1976). Convention Delegate Study of 1972: Women in Politics [Computer file]. Conducted by University of Michigan, Survey Research Center. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
Miller, Warren E., and Jennings, M. Kent (1988). Convention Delegate Study, 1984 [Computer file]. Conducted by the University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
Miller, Warren E., and Jennings, M. Kent (1995). Convention Delegate Study, 1988 [Computer file]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
Miller, Warren E., Jennings, M. Kent, and Farah, Barbara G. (1985). Convention Delegate Study, 1980 [Computer file]. Conducted by University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
Miller, Warren E., and Jennings, M. Kent, in association with Barbara G. Farah (1986). Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Petrocik, John R. (1981). Party Coalitions: Realignments and the Decline of the New Deal Party System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pomper, Gerald M., with Lederman, Susan S. (1980). Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics, 2nd Ed. New York: Longman.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard (1991). Patterns in congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science 35: 228–278.
Pressman, Jeffrey L. (1977-1978). Groups and group caucuses. Political Science Quarterly 92(Winter): 673–682.
Rapoport, Ronald B., and Stone, Walter J. (1994). A model for disaggregating political change. Political Behavior 16(4): 505–532.
Roback, Thomas H. (1975). Amateurs and professionals: delegates to the 1972 Republican national convention. Journal of Politics 37(May): 436–468.
Salisbury, Robert H., and MacKuen, Michael (1981). On the study of party realignment. Journal of Politics 43(May): 523–530.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira (2002). Democrats, Republicans, and the Politics of Women's Place. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sapiro, Virginia, and Farah, Barbara G. (1980). New pride and old prejudice: political ambition and role orientations among female partisan elites. Women &Politics 1: 13–36.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Stanley, Alessandra (1992). 'Family values' and women: Is G.O.P. a house divided? New York Times, August 21, p. A1.
Sullivan, Denis G., Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Arterton, Christopher F. (1976). Explorations in Convention Decision Making: The Democratic Party in the 1970s. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Tabor, Mary B. W., and Applebome, Peter (1992). Voices of women in the 'family values' debate: a sampling, north and south. New York Times, August 21, p. A13.
Wolbrecht, Christina (2000). The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolbrecht, C. Explaining Women's Rights Realignment: Convention Delegates, 1972–1992. Political Behavior 24, 237–282 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021872508054
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021872508054