Abstract
Sickness absenteeism is an increasing public health problem, but few studies have examined the views of laypersons regarding factors that promote return to work. The present investigation concerns the opinions of such individuals on the role employers play in this context. Data from five focus-group interviews of laypersons with experience of long-term sickness absence were subjected to grounded theory analysis. When asked about factors that hinder or promote return to work, the laypersons spontaneously emphasized the importance of the employer. Specifically, they stressed the need for a structured back-to-work program at each workplace, which should include contacting absent employees and informing fellow workers of possible changes in task assignments upon return of the absent person. Reported hindering factors included lack of such information, leading to envy and harassment. Respondents also asserted the importance of work supervisors in creating a positive emotional atmosphere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bloch FS, Prins R, eds. Who returns to work and why? A sixäcountry study on work incapacity and reintegration. London: Transaction Publishers, 2001.
Persson G, Boström G, Diderichsen F, Lindberg G, Pettersson B, Rosén M, Stenbeck M, Wall S. Health in Sweden—The National Public Health Report 2001. Scand J Public Health 2001; 58(Suppl):1–239.
Frank J, Sinclair S, HoggäJohnson S, Shannon H, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D. Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope—if we can just get all the players onside. Can Med Assoc J 1998; 158(12).
van der Weide W, Verbeek J, Sallä H, van Dijk FJ. Prognostic factors for chronic disability from acute low-back pain in occupational health care. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999; 25(1).
Kilbom Å. Return to work: When and how. J UOEH 1997; 19: 93–100.
Leijon M, Hensing G, Alexanderson A. Gender trends in sick-listing with musculoskeletal symptoms in a Swedish country during a period of rapid increase in sickness absence. Scand J Soc Med 1998; 26(3): 204–213.
Nachemson A, Jonsson E, eds. Neck and back pain. The scientific evidence of causes, diagnoses, and treatment. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
Ekberg K. An epidemiologic approach to disorders in the neck and shoulders. Linköping: Linköping university, 1994.
Eklund M. Chronic pain and vocational rehabilitation—a multifactorial analysis of symptoms, signs and psycho-sociodemografic factors. J Occup Rehab 1992; (91): 2225–2230.
Hartigan C, Miller L, Lieweht S. Rehabilitation of acute and subacute low back and neck pain in the workäinjured patient. Occup Disord Manag 1996; 27(4): 841–860.
Buckle P. Work factors and upper limb disorders. Br Med J 1997; 315: 1360–1363.
Tate D. Workers' disability and return to work. Am J Phys Med Rehab 1992; 71(2): 92–96.
Ekberg K, Wildhagen I. Longäterm sickness absence due to musculosceletal disorders: The necessary intervention of work conditions. Scand J Rehab Med 1996; 28: 39–47.
Haig A, Linton P, McIntosh M, Moneta L, Mead P. Aggressive early medical management by a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation: Effect on lost time due to injuries in hospital employees. J Occup Med 1990; 32(3): 241–244.
Ekberg K. Workplace changes in successful rehabilitation. J Occup Rehab 1995; 5(4): 253–269.
Merill N, Pransky G, Hathaway J, Scott D. Illness and the workplace: A study of physicians and employers. J Fam Pract 1990; 31(1): 55–59.
Popay J, Williams G. Public health research and lay knowledge. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42(5): 759–768.
Brines J, Salazar M, Graham K, Pergola T. Return to work. Experience of injuried workers in a case management program. AAOHN J 1999; 47(8): 365–372.
Krueger R. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage, 1994.
Morgan D. The focus group guidebook. London: Sage, 1998.
Stevens P. Focus groups: Collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena. Public Health Nurs 1996; 13(3): 170–176.
Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. Br Med J 1995; 311: 299–302.
Wilkinson S. Focus groups in health research exploring the meanings of health and illness. J Health Psychol 1998; 3(3): 329–348.
Borg K, Hensing G, Alexanderson K. Predicitive factors for disability pension. An 11-year follow-up of young persons on sick leave due to neck, shoulder, or back diagnoses. Scand J Public Health 2001; 29(2): 104–112.
Östlund G, Alexanderson K, Cedersund E, Hensing G. “It was really nice to have someone”: Lay people with musculoskeletal disorders request supportive relationships in rehabilitation. Scand J Public Health 2001; 29(4): 285–291.
Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Cedersund E, Alexanderson K. Att komma igen (To return)(In Swedish). Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 1999; 76(4): 347–356.
Krueger R. Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.
Östlund G, Cedersund E, Alexanderson K, Hensing G. Developing a typology of the “duty to work” as experienced by lay persons with muscelosceletal disorders. Int J Soc Welfare 2002; 11: 150–158.
Krueger R. Analyzing & reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.
Glaser B, ed. More grounded theory, methodology: A reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press, 1994.
Starrin B, Dahlgren L, Larsson G, Styrborn S. Along the Path of Discovery, qualitative methods and grounded theory. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1997.
Richards L. NUD*IST 4, introductory handbook. Qualitative Solutions & Research Pty Ltd., Melbourn, Australia 1998. www-qsr-com-au
SOU. Rehabilitation for work. A reform centering on the individual. Summary (Report No-: 2000:78). Stockholm: Social departementet, 2000.
Peters P. Successful return to work following a musculoskeletal injury. AAOHN J 1990; 38(6): 264–270.
Krause N, Dasinger L, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: A review of the literature. J Occup Rehab 1998; 8(2).
Crook J, Moldofsky H. Prognostic indicators of disability after a workärelated musculoskeletal injury. J Musculoskel Pain 1995; 3(2): 155–159.
Morgan D. Planning focus groups. London: Sage, 1998.
Halloran JDG. Application of the focus group methodology to educational program development. Qual Health Res 1995; 5(4): 444–453.
Gulanic M, Keough V. Focus groups: An exciting approach to clinical nursing research. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs 1997; 12(2): 24–29.
Kahn M, Manderson L. Focus groups in tropical diseases research. Health Policy Plan 1992; (7): 56–66.
Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Krueger R. Analyzing and reporting focus group results. London: Sage, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nordqvist, C., Holmqvist, C. & Alexanderson, K. Views of Laypersons on the Role Employers Play in Return to Work When Sick-Listed. J Occup Rehabil 13, 11–20 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021841722613
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021841722613