Skip to main content
Log in

Women's Labor Force Participation and Status Exchange in Intermarriage: A Model and Evidence for Hawaii1

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics

Abstract

Women's labor force participation, ethnic status and interracial marriage are examined in this paper to test Grossbard-Shechtman's marriage market theory. Perceived racial and ethnic group status is found to be an important attribute in marriage market exchange that combines marriage and working outside the home. Caucasian women, who have a higher perceived ethnic status, tend not to work when they marry men of a lower perceived ethnic status, while the opposite is found of women who have a lower perceived group status and who marry into a higher-status group. This is especially of women with low education, while highly educated women are less affected by compensating differentials at marriage as related to ethnic status of the couple. Ethnic groups that have a recent immigration history also have a different pattern of intermarriage and women's labor force participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Adams, Romanzo C. 1969. Interracial marriage in Hawaii; a study of the mutually conditioned processes of acculturation and amalgamation. Patterson Smith, 1969 [c1937], Montclair, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apps, Patricia. 1981. A theory of inequality and taxation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Larry D. 1962. Research in interreligious dating marriage. Marriage and Family Living 24:191–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary. 1965. A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal 75:493–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary. 1973. A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81:813–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary. 1981. A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, 1981.

  • Bergstrom, Theodore C. 1997. A survey of theories of the family. In Rosenzweig, Mark & Oded Stark, Handbook of population and family economics. Northholland-Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M., T. C. Blum & J. E. Schwartz. 1982. Heterogeneity and intermarriage. American Sociological Review 47:45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. & Joseph E. Schwartz. 1984. Cross-cutting social circles: testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M., Carolyn Beeker & Kevin M. Fitzpatrick. 1984. Intersecting social affiliations and intermarriage. Social Forces 62:585–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boissevain, Jeremy. 1974. Friends of friends: networks, manipulators, and coalitions. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brien, Michael & Michelle Seran. (Forthcoming). The economics of marriage and household formation. In Marriage and the Economy, edited by Shoshana Grossbard-Shechtman. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

  • Browning, Martin, Francois Bourguignon, Pierre-Andre Chiappori & Valerie LeChene. 1994. Incomes and outcomes: a structural model of intrahousehold allocation. Journal of Political Economy 102(6):1067–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus. 1971. White attitudes toward black people: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori, Pierre-Andre. 1992. Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy 100:437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, Barry. 1988. Labor supply and investment in child quality: a study of Jewish and non-Jewish women. Contemporary Jewry 9:35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kingsley. 1941. Intermarriage in caste societies. American Anthropologist 43:376–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, John N. 1969. Familial behavior as social exchange. Journal of Marriage and the Family 31:518–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Xuanning, & Tim B. Heaton. 1997. Interracial marriage in Hawaii: 1983–1994. The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronau, Reuben. 1977. Leisure, home production, and work—the theory of the allocation of time revisited. Journal of Political Economy. 85:1099–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronau, Reuben. 1981. Wives' labor force participation, wage differentials, and family income inequality: the Israeli experience. Working Paper 668. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, Amyra. 1984. A theory of allocation of time in markets for labour and marriage. Economic Journal 94(December):863–882.

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana A. 1993. On the economics of marriage. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana A 2001. A model of labor supply and marriage. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Economic Association in New Orleans (January).

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana A. (ed.) (Forthcoming). Marriage and the Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana & Clive W.J. Granger. 1998. Women's jobs and marriage: baby-boom or baby bust. Population, 53:731–752 (in French).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana A. & Matthew Neideffer 1997. Women's hours of work and marriage market imbalances. In Economics of the Family and Family Policies, edited by Inga Persson & Christina Jonung, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana A. & Shoshana Neuman. 1988. Labor supply and marital choice. Journal of Political Economy 96(December): 1294–1302.

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana A. & Shoshana Neuman. 1998. The extra burden of Moslem wives: clues from Israeli women's labor supply. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46(April):491–518.

  • Gurak, Douglas T. & Joseph P. Fitzpatrick. 1982. Intermarriage among Hispanic ethnic groups in New York City. American Journal of Sociology 87:921–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, Tim B. 1990. Religious groups characteristics, endogamy, and interfaith marriages. Review of Religious Research 51:363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James. 1974. Shadow prices, market wages and labor supply. Econometrica 42:679–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heer, David M. 1962. The trend of interfaith marriages in Canada: 1922–1957. American Sociological Review 27:245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heer, David M. 1966. Negro-white marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family 80:262–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heer, David M. 1974. The prevalence of Black-white marriage in the U.S., 1960 and 1970. Journal of Marriage and the Family 36:246–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, Joni. 1997. The economics of home production. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies 6:421–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, August B. 1950. Cultural factors in the selection of marriage mates. American Sociological Review 15:619–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HSMDH. 1995. Office of Health Monitoring, Department of Health, State of Hawaii. Marriage certificate data compilation file, 1983–1994.

  • Jackson, R. M., Claude S. Fischer & J. M. Jones. 1977. The dimensions of social networks. In Claude S. Fischer (Ed.), Networks and Places: Social Relations in the Urban Setting. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, Matthijs. 1993. Trends in Black/white intermarriage. Social Forces 72:119–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, Teresa & Jerry A. Jacobs. 1986. Intermarriage in Hawaii, 1950–1983. Journal of Marriage and the Family 48(February):79–88.

  • Lehrer, Evelyn L. 1995. The effects of religion on the labor supply of married women. Social Science Research 24:281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, Evelyn L. (Forthcoming). The economics of divorce. In Marriage and the Economy, edited by Shoshana Grossbard-Shechtman. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

  • Lundberg, Shelly & Robert A. Pollak. 1993. Separate sphere bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy 101:988–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser, Marilyn & Murray Brown. 1980. Marriage and household decision making: a bargaining analysis. International Economic Review 21:31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, Marjorie B. & Mary Jane Horney. 1981. Nash bargained household decisions: toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review 22:31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1941. Intermarriage and the social structure. Psychiatry 4:361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, Jacob. 1962. Labor force participation of married women: a study of labor supply. In Aspects of labor economics, edited by H. Gregg Lewis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, Valerie K. 1994. Women's rising employment and the future of the family in industrial society. Population and Development Review 20(June):293–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkman, Margaret A. & Jack Sawyer. 1967. Dimensions of ethnic intermarriage in Hawaii. American Sociological Review 32:593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionel. 1930. On the elasticity of demand for income in terms of efforts. Economica 10:123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Erich. 1963. Studies of Jewish intermarriage in the United States. American Jewish Yearbook 64:3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, Carl A. & Arthur W. Avery. 1979. Social network influence on the dyadic relationship. In Robert L. Burgess & Ted L. Huston (eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionel. 1930. On the elasticity of demand for income in terms of efforts. Economica 10:123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, Robert. 1986. A methodological analysis of intergroup marriage. Sociological Methodology 16:49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, Robert & John Wooldredge. 1989. Marriage choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969–71 and 1979–81. Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spickard, Paul R. 1989. Mixed blood: intermarriage and ethnic identity in twentieth-century America. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, John L. 1972. The factor of religion in the selection of marriage mates. In M. L. Barron (Ed.), The blending American: patterns of intermarriage. Quadrangle Books, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, Donald J. 1977. Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M. Belinda & Claudia Mitchell-Kernan. 1990. New trends in black American interracial marriage: the social structural context. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52:209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Ruth A. & Allison Wolf. 1991. Contemporary sociological theory—continuing the classical tradition. 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, Frances. 1988. A non-cooperative model of family decision making. Working paper # 125. London School of Economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, Frances. (Forthcoming). Control over money in marriage. In Grossbard-Shechtman (ed.) Marriage and the Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grossbard-Shechtman, S., Fu, X. Women's Labor Force Participation and Status Exchange in Intermarriage: A Model and Evidence for Hawaii1 . Journal of Bioeconomics 4, 241–268 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021776126532

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021776126532

Navigation