Climatic Change

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 245–255 | Cite as

Catastrophic Events and Stochastic Cost-benefit Analysis of Climate Change

  • Crhistian Azar
  • Kristian Lindgren
Editorial Commentary


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcamo, J. and Kreileman, E.: 1996, ‘Emission Scenarios and Global Climate Protection’, Global Environ. Change 6, 305–334.Google Scholar
  2. Azar, C.: 1998, ‘Are Optimal Emissions Really Optimal-Four Critical Issues for Economists in the Greenhouse’, Environ. Resour. Econ. 11, 301–315.Google Scholar
  3. Azar, C.: 1999, ‘Weight Factors in Cost-benefit Analysis of Climate Change’, Environ. Resour. Econ. 13, 249–268.Google Scholar
  4. Azar, C.: 2000, ‘Economics and Distribution in the Greenhouse’, Clim. Change 47, 233–238.Google Scholar
  5. Azar, C. and Rodhe, H.: 1997, ‘Targets for Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2’, Science 276, 1818–1819.Google Scholar
  6. Azar, C. and Schneider, S. H.: 2001, ‘Are Uncertainties in Climate and Energy Systems a Justification for Stronger Near-Term Mitigation Policies?’, Paper prepared for Pew Center on Global Change, workshop on the timing of climate change policies. Available at Scholar
  7. Azar, C. and Schneider, S. H.: 2002, ‘Are the Economic Costs of Stabilizing the Atmosphere Prohibitive?’, Ecological Economics 42, 73–80.Google Scholar
  8. Azar, C. and Sterner, T.: 1996, ‘Discounting and Distributional Considerations in the Context of Climate Change’, Ecological Economics 19, 169–185.Google Scholar
  9. Cline, W. R.: 1992, The Economics of Global Warming, Institute of International Economics, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Fankhauser, S.: 1995, Valuing Climate Change, Earthscan, U.K.Google Scholar
  11. Fankhauser, S., Tol, R. S. J., and Pearce, D.W.: 1997, ‘The Aggregation of Climate Change Damages: A Welfare Theoretic Approach’, Environ. Resour. Econ. 10, 249–266.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, A. C.: 2001, ‘Uncertainty, Irreversibility and the Timing of Climate Policy’, Paper presented to PEWCenter for Global Climate Change, October 10–12.Google Scholar
  13. Gjerde, J., Grepperud, S., and Kverndokk, S.: 1999, ‘Optimal Climate Policy under the Possibility of a Catastrophe’, Resource and Energy Economics 21, 289–317.Google Scholar
  14. Grubb, M.: 1993, ‘The Costs of Climate Change. Critical Elements’, in Kaya, Y., Nakicenovic, N., Nordhaus, W. D., and Toth, F. L. (eds.), Costs, Impacts, and Benefits of CO2 Mitigation, pp. 153–166. Proceedings of a workshop held at IIASA, September 1992, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  15. Ha-Duong, M., Grubb, M., and Hourcade, J.-C.: 1997, ‘Influence of Socioeconomic Inertia and Uncertainty on Optimal CO2-Emission Abatement’, Nature 390, 270–273.Google Scholar
  16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC): 2001a, Climate Change 2001. The scientific basis Contribution ofWorking Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Houghton et al. (eds.), University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC): 2001b, Climate Change 2001. Impacts adaptation and vulnerability Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. McCarthy, J. J., Canziani O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D., and White, K. S. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Kolstad, C. D.: 1994, ‘George Bush vs Al Gore: Irreversibilities in Greenhouse Gas Accumulation and Emission Control Investment’, Energy Policy 22, 771–778.Google Scholar
  19. Kolstad, C. D.: 1996a, ‘Learning and Stock Effects in Environmental Regulation: The Case of Greenhouse Gas Emissions’, J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 31, 1–18.Google Scholar
  20. Kolstad, C. D.: 1996b, ‘Fundamental Irreversibilities in Stock Externalities’, Journal of Public Economics 60, 221–233.Google Scholar
  21. Lempert, R. J. and Schlesinger, M. E.: 2000, ‘Robust Strategies for Abating Climate Change’, Clim. Change 45, 387–401.Google Scholar
  22. Manne, A. S.: 1995, ‘The Rate of Time Preference — Implications for the Greenhouse Effect’, Energy Policy 23, 391–394.Google Scholar
  23. Manne, A. S.: 1996, ‘Hedging Strategies for Global Carbon Dioxide Abatement: A Summary of Poll Results EMF 14 Subgroup — Analysis for Decision Making under Uncertainty’, in Nakicenovic, N. et al., Climate Change: Integrating Science, Economic and Policy. Proceedings of a workshop held at IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, June 19–20 March, pp. 207–228.Google Scholar
  24. Manne, A. S. and Richels, R.: 1992, Buying Greenhouse Insurance. The Cost of CO2 reductions, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Mastrandrea, M. and Schneider, S.: 2001, ‘Integrated Assessment of Abrupt Climatic Changes’, Climate Policy 1, 433–449.Google Scholar
  26. Narain, U. and Fisher, A. C.: 2001, ‘Irreversibility, Uncertainty and Global Warming: A Theoretical Analysis’, Manuscript. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, University of California.Google Scholar
  27. Nordhaus, W. D.: 1994, Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. O'Neill, B. C. and Oppenheimer, M.: 2002, ‘Dangerous Climate Impacts and the Kyoto Protocol’, Science 296, 1971–1972.Google Scholar
  29. Oppenheimer, M.: 1998, ‘Global Warming and the Stability of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet’, Nature 393, 325–332.Google Scholar
  30. Peck, S. C. and Teisberg, T. J.: 1993, ‘Global Warming Uncertainties and the Value of Information: An analysis Using CETA’, Resource and Energy Economics 15, 71–97. Rijsberman, F. R. and Swart, R. J. (eds.): 1990, Targets and Indicators of Climatic Change. Stockholm Environment Institute, Box 1240, 105 14 Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  31. Roughgarden, T. and Schneider, S. H.: 1999, ‘Quantifying Uncertainties for Damage from Climate Change’, Energy Policy 27, 415–429.Google Scholar
  32. Schneider, S. H.: 1993, ‘Pondering Greenhouse Policy’, Science 259, 1381.Google Scholar
  33. Schneider, S. H.: 1997, ‘Integrated Assessment Modeling of Global Climate Change: Transparent Rational Tool for Policy Making or Opaque Screen Hiding Value-Laden Assumptions’, Environ. Model. Assess. 2, 229–248.Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, S. H.: 1997, ‘Integrated Assessment Modelling of Global Climate Change: Transparent Rational Tool for Policy Making or Opaque Screen Hiding Value-Laden Assumptions’, Environ. Model. Assess. 2, 229–248.Google Scholar
  35. Schneider, S. H., Kuntz-Duriseti, K., and Azar, C.: 2000, ‘Costing Nonlinearities, Surprises and Irreversible Events’, Pacific and Asian Journal of Energy 10 (1), 81–106.Google Scholar
  36. Tol, R. S. J.: 2003, ‘Is the Uncertainty about Climate Change too Large for Expected Cost-Benefit Analysis?’, Clim. Change 56, 265–289.Google Scholar
  37. UNFCCC: 1992, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, www.unfccc.chGoogle Scholar
  38. WBGU: 1995, Scenarios for Derivation of Global CO2 Reduction Targets and Implementation Strategies, Bremerhaven, Germany.Google Scholar
  39. Yohe, G. and Wallace, R.: 1996, ‘Near-Term Mitigation Policy for Global Change under Uncertainty: Minimizing the Expected Cost of Meeting Unknown Concentration Thresholds’, Environ. Model. Assess. 2, 47–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Crhistian Azar
    • 1
  • Kristian Lindgren
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical Resource TheoryChalmers University of Technology, Göteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations