Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-border conservation in East Central Europe: The Danube-Carpathian complex and the contribution of the World Wide Fund for Nature

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cross-border cooperation in environmental matters has become much more evident since 1989 because open frontiers facilitate contact while common tasks emerge as protected areas in frontier zones lose their isolation. Pollution hazards have been discussed more openly since 1989 while further stimuli arise from the harmonisation process in the run-up to EU enlargement and the finance available from Brussels and other international donors to solve pollution problems and create international ecological networks. The paper examines the progress made in the Danube Valley and the Carpathians which together constitute the core of East Central Europe. Particular attention is paid to the role of environmental non-governmental organisations (ENGOs) – and especially the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) – in the progress of conservation. Along with the World Conservation Union (IUCN), WWF has demonstrated the value of floodplain wetlands and ensured that wetland restoration is an important part of the Strategic Action Plan for the Danube. And by involving local ENGOs in specific projects the role of the non-governmental sector in environment matters is enhanced. Also, with momentum growing for a pan-European ecological network ('Natura 2000'), WWF has attracted the support of international donors for a ecoregion-based conservation (ERBC) in the Carpathians where priority areas have now been identified. Ecological and diplomatic capacities are thus deployed to maximise the scope for biodiversity conservation commensurate with sustainable socio-economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avis C. (ed.), 2000: WWF Agenda for Accession: the 'New' European Union. WWF, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avis C., van Wetten J., Seffer J., Tinchev G. and Weller P., 2000: 'Danube river basion: wetlands and floodplains'. In:Wood A., Stedman-Edwards P., Mang J. (eds.), The Root Causes of Biodiversity Loss. Earthscan WWF International, London, pp. 183–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backmeroff C., Chemini C. and La Spada P., 1996: European Inter-Governmental Consultation on Sustainable Mountain Development. Giunta della Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Trento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldock D., Bennett H. and Verschuur G.W., 2001: Agri-Environmental Policy Development in CEE: Synthesis Report of a Multi-Partner Project. Avalon Foundation, Wommels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandacu, D., Moldovan, M., Nichersu, I., Paun, A., 1993: Reconstuctia ecologică de la ipoteze la realitate, Analele Ştiintifice al Institutului Delta Dunarii 2, 267–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann A., 2000: Initiatives for sustainable development in the White Carpathians', Rural Areas Newslink: Newsletter for Agriculture Environment & Rural Development in Central & Eastern Europe 9: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett G., 1998: Guidelines for establishing the Pan-European Ecological Network in Central & Eastern Europe. In: Nowicki P. (ed.), The Green Backbone of Central & Eastern Europe'. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borissov K., 1998: The networking activities of the PHARE Multi-Country Programme for the Environment (MCPEnv). In: Nowicki P. (ed.), The Green Backbone of Central & Eastern Europe. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi F., Boitani L. and Urquhart W.P., 1998: The large carnivore initiative for Europe. In: Nowicki P. (ed.), The Green Backbone of Central & Eastern Europe. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 148–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragomir D. and Staras M., 1992: Dinamica unor efective de pāsari de importanta faunistică din Delta Dunării şi impactul biologic asupra produc tiei piscicole în perioada 1945–1989. Ocrotirea Naturii şi Mediul Inconjurator 36(2): 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice J., 1994: Damming the Danube: Gabcikovo-Nagymaros and Post-Communist Politics in Europe Westview, Boulder, col.

  • Gàstescu P., 1991: Les transformations morpho-hydrodynamiques et l'equiilibre écologique dans le delta du Daunbe. Revue Roumaine de Geographie 35: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gàstescu P., 1993: The Danube delta: geographical characteristics and ecological recovery. GeoJournal 29: 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gàstescu P., 1995: Contributions to the coastal zone management of the Romanian sector of the Black Sea. Revue Roumaine de Géographie 39: 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gàstescu P., 1996: The Danube delta biosphere reserve: present state and management. Revue Roumaine de Géographie 40: 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gàstescu P., 1998: Danube River. In: Herschy R.W. and Fairbridge R.W. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Hydrology and Water Resources. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gàstescu P. and Oltean M., 1997: Ecosystems Map of the DDBR. Academia Românà, Bucharest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gàstescu P. and Oltean M., 1998: Ecosystems of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. Institute for Inland WaterManagement & WasteWater Treatment, Leliestad and Institutul de Cercetare si Proiectare Delta Dunarii, Institut de Geografie, Institut de Geologie, Tulcea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godde P.M., Price M.F., Zimmerman F.M, 2000: Tourism and development in mountain regions moving forward into the new millennium. Tourism and Development in Mountain Regions. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goriup P., 1994: Biodiversity, ecological investment and sustainable development in the Danube Delta biosphere reserve, Romania. Ecos 14(1): 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goriup P., (ed.), 1995: Management Objectives for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve, Romania. Nature Conservation Bureau for the DDBR Authority, Newbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyulai I. (ed.), 1998: The European Union and Biodiversity. Friends of the Earth Europe, Brussels.

  • Herbich J. and Warzocha J., 1998: Baltic sea protection areas network and Polish red list of coastal biotopes against the background of the Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) Environment Committee Nature Activities. In: Nowicki P. (ed.), The Green Backbone of Central & Eastern Europe. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huba M. and Ira V., 1999: Border regions and development from the sustainability perspective: the case of the Lower Morava river region, Slovakia. Moravian Geographical Reports 7(2): 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN & WWF International, 2000: Restoration of Small-Scale Wetlands in the Danube River Basin: PHARE programme – Draft Final Report. WWF, Vienna; IUCN, Tilburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer A., 1990: Ecological Bricks for our Common House in Europe: Global Challenges Network. Verlag fur Okologie, Münich..

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasak R., Seffer J. and Cierna M., 1999: Historical analysis of changes of the spatial structure of the Morava River floodplain. In: Seffer J. and Stanova V. (eds.), Morava River Floodplain Meadows: Importance Restoration and Management. DAPHNE Centre for Applied Ecology, Bratislava, pp. 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggi P. and Nijkamp P., 1992: Missing networks and regional development in Europe. In: Vasko T. (ed.), Problems of economic transition: regional development in Central & Eastern Europe. Avebury, Aldershot, pp. 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin G. and Schneider E. (eds.), 1997: Ecological Restoration in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve, Romania. DDBRA/DDRDI/WWF, Tulcea.

  • Marinov M., Hulea D. and Condac M., 1996: Dinamica avifaunei din RBDD în corelatia cu principalii factori de mediu. Analele Ştiintifice ale Institut Delta Dunării 5: 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mee L.D., 1992: The Black Sea in crisis: the need for concerted international action. Ambio 21: 278–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mee L.D., 2001: Can the marine and coastal environment of the Black Sea be protected? In: Aybak T. (ed.), Politics of the Black Sea: Dynamics of Cooperation and Conflict. IB Tauris, London, pp. 133–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklos L., 1992: Protecting the environment during regional development. In: Vasko T. (ed.), Problems of Economic Transition: Regional Development in Central & Eastern Europe. Avebury, Aldershot, pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklos L., 1998: The Danube-Carpathian region and the green backbone of Europe. In: Nowicki P. (ed.), The Green Backbone of Central & Eastern Europe'. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraru T., Cucu V. and Velcea I., 1966: The Geography of Romania. Meridiane, Bucharest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nefedova T., 1992: Use of environment and resultant problems in Central & Eastern Europe. In: Jordan P. (ed.), Atlas Ost-und Sudosteuropa. Osterreichishes Ost-und Sudosteuropa-Institut, Vienna, pp. 1.2–G4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaev S., 1997: Could the Black Sea ecosystem be rehabilitated? Romanian Business Journal 4(35):12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki P., 1996: European ecological networks: perspectives in policy planning and law. In: Nowicki P., Bennett G., Middleton D., Rientjes S. and Wolters A.R. (eds.), Persopectives on Ecological Networks. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki P., 1998: The Cracow declaration. In: Nowicki P. (ed.), The green backbone of Central & Eastern Europe. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostry D., 1988: The GabČikovo-Nagymaros dam systems as a case study in conflict of interests in Czechoslovakia and Hungary. Slovo: Journal of Contemporary Soviet & East European Affairs 1(1): 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panin, N., 1992: Situatia ecologică în partea de nord vest a Marii Negre, Mediul Inconjurător 3(1),27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascariu S., 1997: Water preservation strategies and the regional plan for the DDBR. In: Graute U. (ed.), Sustainable Development for Central & Eastern Europe. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paun A., Curelariu G. and Grigoras C., 1994: Caracterizarea ecopedalogică a ostrovului Babina în vedere fundmentarii masurilor de ameliorare a starii ecologice actuale. Analele Ştiintifice ale Institutului Delta Dunării 3: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perzanowski K., 1999: Long term ecological research in the Bieszczady Mountains. In: Bijok P. and Prus M. (eds.), Long Term Ecological Research: Examples Methods and Perspectives for Central Europe: Proceedings of the ILTER Regional Workshop, Madralin.International Centre of Ecology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, pp. 131–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petranu A., 1997: Black Sea Biological Diversity: Romania. Un Publications GEF Black Sea Environmental Programme, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radai O., 1998: The Danube River Basin as an ecological system within the Pan-European Ecological Network: tools for implementation. In: Nowicki P. (ed.), The Green backbone of Central & Eastern Europe. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radu O., 1979: Păsarile din Delta Dunării. Editura Academiei RSR, Bucharest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanescu G., 1997: Delta Dunării: impactul om natura. Analele Universitătii de Vest din Timişoara 7: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzicka M. and Miklos L., 1990: Basic premises and methods in landscapeecological planning and optimization. In: Zonnenveld I.S. and Forman R.T.T. (eds.), Changing Landscapes: an Ecological Perspective Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 233–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybanic R., Seffer J. and Cierna M., 1999: Economic valuation of benefits from conservation and restoration of floodplain meadows. In: Seffer J. and Stanova V. (eds.), Morava River Floodplain Meadows: Importance Restoration and Management.DAPHNE Centre for Applied Ecology, Bratislava, pp. 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seffer J., Cierna M., Stanova V., Lasak R. and Galvanek D., 1999: Large scale restoration of floodplain meadows. In: Seffer J. and Stanova V. (eds.), Morava River Floodplain Meadows: importance Restoration and Management.DAPHNE Centre for Applied Ecology, Bratislava, pp. 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafin R., Kiss R. and Mitchell B., 1998: The potential for land stewardship in establishing ecological networks in Central Europe. In: Nowicki P. (ed.), The Green Backbone of Central & Eastern Europe Netherlands: European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilov A.S., 1997: Ecological prospects for the Black Sea region. In: Graute U. (ed.), Sustainable Development for Central & Eastern Europe. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee B., 1999: A Tourism Development Plan for the Stuzhytsa-Ushanski Park, Ukraine. University of Aberdeen Department of Agriculture, Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanners D. and Bourdeau P. (eds.), 1995: Europe's Environment: the Dobris Assessment. European Environment Bureau, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryjakiewicz T., 1998: The changing role of border zones in the transforming economies of East-Central Europe. GeoJournal 44: 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suli-Zakar I., 1999: Sociogeographical transition in the rural areas of the Carpathian Euroregion. GeoJournal 46: 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szekely V., 1995: Stimulation factors of the frontier region's development: theoretical reflection. In: Baran V. (ed.) Boundaries and Their Impact on the Territorial Structure of Region and State. University M. Bel, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Banska Bystrica, pp. 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadineanu A., 1998: MAB Biosphere Reserves and the Council of Europe Biogenetic Reserves and European Diploma Sites as nodes the Pan-European Ecological Network in Central & Eastern Europe. In: Nowicki P. (ed.), The Green Backbone of Central & Eastern Europe. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, pp. 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voloscuk I., 1998: Ecological stability in the Tatra Mountains forests. Ecology 17: 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voloscuk I. (ed.), 1999: The National Parks and Biosphere Reserves of the Carpathians: the Last Nature Paradise. ACANAP, Tatranska Lomnica.

  • Weller P. and Gunther-Diringer D., 1999: Danube Pollution Reduction Programme: Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin. WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme, Vienna.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geography Department, The University, Leicester, LE1 7RH, U.K.

    David Turnock

Authors
  1. David Turnock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turnock, D. Cross-border conservation in East Central Europe: The Danube-Carpathian complex and the contribution of the World Wide Fund for Nature. GeoJournal 55, 655–681 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021709515847

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021709515847

Search

Navigation