Abstract
The authors review the function of boundaries within teaching and supervisory relationships and identify patterns that create vulnerability to boundary infringement. Boundary violations are conceptualized as a process that that is more likely to develop when teachers and supervisors are isolated and under stress. Suggestions are made for a personal check up that focus on self-care, student care, and care of the professional group.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (1985). Code of ethical principles for marriage and family therapists. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (1988). Code of ethical principles for marriage and family therapists. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (1991). Code of ethical principles for marriage and family therapists. Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.
Biaggio, M., & Greene, B. (1995). Overlapping/dual relationships. In E. J. Rave & C. C. Larsen (Eds.), Ethical decision making in therapy: Feminist perspectives (pp. 88–123). New York: Guilford Press.
Bowman, V. E. (1995). Faculty-student relationships: The dual-role controversy. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 232–242.
Brown, L. S. (1994). Boundaries in feminist therapy: A conceptual formulation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 323–336.
Gabbard, G., & Pope, K. S. (1989). Sexual intimacies after termination: Clinical, ethical, and legal aspects. In G. Gabbard (Ed.), Sexual exploitation in professional relationships (pp. 115–127). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Glaser, R. D., & Thorpe, J. S. (1986). Unethical intimacy: A survey of sexual contact and advances between psychology educators and female graduate students. American Psychologist, 41, 43–51.
Kitchener, K. S. (1988). Dual role relationships: What makes then so problematic? Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 217–221.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peterson, M. (1992). At personal risk: Boundary violations in professional-client relationships. New York: Norton.
Peterson, M. (1993). Covert agenda in supervision: Identifying the real culprit. The Commission on Supervision Bulletin, IV(1), pp. 1–7.
Peterson, C. M. (1995). An investigation of dual relationships in MFT supervision: Their formation, management, and consequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Plaut, S. M. (1993). Boundary issues in teacher-student relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 19, 210–219.
Pope, K. S. (1989). Teacher-student sexual intimacy. In G. Gabbard (Ed.), Sexual exploitation in professional relationships (pp. 163–176). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Pope, K. S., Keith-Spiegel, P., & Tabachnick, B. S. (1986). Sexual attraction to clients: The human therapist and the (sometimes) inhuman training system. American Psychologist, 41, 147–158.
Pope, K. S., Levenson, H., & Schover, L. (1979). Sexual intimacy in psychology training: Results and implications of a national survey. American Psychologist, 34, 682–689.
Preister, S., Vesper, J. H., & Humphrey, F. (1994). The evolution of a professional code of ethics. In G. W. Brock (Ed.), American association for marriage and family therapy ethics casebook (pp. 11–25). Washington, DC: American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.
Reid, E., McDaniel, S., Donaldson, C., & Tollers, M. (1987). Taking it personally: Issues of personal authority and competence for the female in family therapy training. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 157–166.
Ryder, R. G., & Hepworth, J. (1990). AAMFT ethical code: “Dual relationships”. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 127–132.
Storm, C. L. (1991a). Changing the line: An interview with Edwin Friedman. The Commission on Supervision-Bulletin, IV(3), 1–2.
Storm, C. L. (1991b). Drawing the line?: An issue for all supervisors. The Commission on Supervision Bulletin, IV(3), 1.
Storm, C. L. (1993). Dual relationships: Broadening our understanding. The Commission on Supervision Bulletin, IV(1), 1.
Storm, C. L., Peterson, M., & Tomm, K. (1997). Multiple relationships in supervision: Stepping up to complexity. In T. C. Todd & C. L. Storm (Eds.), The complete systemic supervisor (pp. 253–271). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Tomm, K. (1993). Defining supervision and therapy: A fuzzy boundary? The Commission on Supervision Bulletin, VI(1), 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russell, C.S., Peterson, C.M. The Management of Personal and Professional Boundaries in Marriage and Family Therapy Training Programs. Contemporary Family Therapy 20, 457–470 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021676015676
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021676015676