Skip to main content
Log in

Who Protests in America: An Analysis of Three Political Alternatives—Inaction, Institutionalized Politics, or Protest

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Theories of social movements and collective action typically present social protest as one of three alternatives available to the individual: inaction, institutionalized political action, or protest. These political alternatives are rarely considered simultaneously nor are they modeled explicitly. In this paper we make use of survey data from a representative sample of the United States population. We employ multinomial logistic regression to determine what differentiates those who protest from those who engage only in institutionalized politics and from those who engage in no political action. We find that those who engage in social protest are similar in many respects to those who engage actively in institutionalized politics, yet education on social and political issues, participation in community organizations, and frequent church attendance increases the likelihood that individuals will engage in protest relative to institutionalized politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Blee, Kathleen 1991 Women of the Klan: Racism and Gender in the 1920s. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Richard 1978 “The puzzle of political participation in America.” In Anthony King, (ed.), The New Political System: 287–324. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Craig 1993 “'New social movements' of the early 19th century.” Social Science History 17:385–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, José 1994 Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jean 1985 “Strategy or identity: New theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements.” Social Research 52:663–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, William 1991 Political Participation and American Democracy. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William 1975 The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 Talking Politics. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, John 1980 Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in the Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Roger 1991 “Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris commune, 1871.” American Sociological Review, 56:716–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, John, James Guth, Corwin Smidt, and Lyman Kellstedt 1996 Religion and the Culture wars: Dispatches From the Front. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, J. and K. Tierney 1982 “Relative deprivation and social movements: A critical look at twenty years of theory and research.” Sociological Quarterly 23:33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Ted Robert 1970 Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Stephen 1996 What Does the Lord Require? How American Christians Think About Economic Justice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. and Daniel McFadden 1984 “Specification tests for the multinomial logit model.” Econometrica 52:1219–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Hank and Bert Klandermans 1995 Social Movements and Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert 1997 The Social Psychology of Protest. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin 1981 Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven 1974 Power: A Radical View. London: MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. 1983 Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug 1982 Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency.” American Sociological Review, 48:735–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “Recruitment to high risk activism: the case of freedom summer.” American Journal of Sociology, 92:64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John and Mayer Zald 1977 “Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory.” American Journal of Sociology, 82:1212–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Aldon 1984 The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing For Change. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, Anthony 1973 Social Conflict and Social Movements. New Brunswick, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1993 Social Movements: Ideologies, Interests, and Identities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, Liston 1942 Millhands and Preachers: A Study of Gastonia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1982 Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnerus, Mark and Christian Smith 1998 “Selective de-privatization among American religious traditions: A great reversal of the great reversal.” Social Forces 76:1347–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, James 1988 Theories of Civil Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Michael 1976 Radical Protest and Social Structure: The Southern Farmers' Alliance and Cotton Tenancy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Christian 1991 The Emergence of Liberation Theology: radical Religion and Social Movement Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1996a Disruptive Religion: The Force of Faith in Social Movement Activism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1996b Resisting Reagan: The U.S. Central America Peace Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tom 1990 “Classifying Protestant denominations.” Review of Religious Research, 31:225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David, Louis Zurcher, and Sheldon Ekland-Olson 1980 “Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment.” American Sociological Review 45:787–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney 1994 Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, Ruy 1992 The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles 1978 From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Bert 1980 “Solidarity model, breakdown model, and the Boston anti-busing movement.” American Sociological Review, 45:357–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Norman Nie, and Jae-on Kim 1978 Participation and Political Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, Mayer and John McCarthy 1987 “Religious groups as crucibles of social movements.” In Mayer Zald and John McCarthy (eds.), Social Movements in an Organizational Society: 67–95. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McVeigh, R., Smith, C. Who Protests in America: An Analysis of Three Political Alternatives—Inaction, Institutionalized Politics, or Protest. Sociological Forum 14, 685–702 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021656121301

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021656121301

Navigation