Skip to main content
Log in

Attachment as an Integrating Concept in Couple and Family Therapy: Some Considerations with Special Reference to South Africa

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Couples, marital, and family therapy in South Africa and throughout the world have undergone radical changes in theory and practice in the last three to four decades. These developments are seen in the emergence of different approaches which may be regarded as modern or post-modern, intrapsychic or systemic. While these different approaches are often seen as theoretically and clinically incompatible, it is the aim in this paper to suggest that the time has come to seek points of integration of these different approaches, and the construct of attachment is proposed as an ideal integrating concept. Two case illustrations are used to demonstrate attachment as an integrating concept. It is suggested that the concept of attachment may also be applied to family therapists and associations, including and especially in South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1991). Attachments and other affectional bonds across the life cycle. In C. M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde & P. Marais (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 33–51). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., & Thompson, J. (1995). The application of attachment theory to counselling psychology. The Counselling Psychologist, 23, 484–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H., & Epstein, N. (1990). Cognitive-behavioural marital therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, W. H., Marcus, L., & Berman, E. R. (1994). Attachment in marital relationships. In M. B. Sperling & W. H. Berman (Eds.), Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives (pp. 204–231). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I. (1986). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 3–38.

  • Byng-Hall, J. (1995). Rewriting family scripts. New York, Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., & Draper, R. (1985). Applications of systemic family therapy: The Milan approach. London: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicks, H. (1967). Marital tensions: Clinical studies towards a psychological theory of interaction. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., Bradbury, T. N., & Scott, C. K. (1990). Cognition in marriage. In F. D. Fincham & T. N. Bradbury (Eds.), The psychology of marriage (pp. 118–149). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonaghy, P., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1991). Maternal representation of attachment during pregnancy predict the organization of infant-mother attachment at one year of age. Child Development, 62, 891–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. (1987). Predictive implications of individual differences in attachment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 817–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M. (1991) Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring and single (coherent) vs multiple (incoherent) models of attachment: Findings and directions for future research. In C. M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, & P. Morris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 127–159). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M. (1996). Introduction to special section on attachment and psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 237–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1984). Predicting rejection of her infant from mother's representation of her own experience: Implications of the abused-abusing intergenerational cycle. Child Abuse & Neglect, 8, 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M. & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M. T. Greenberg, D., Cichetti, & E. N. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Research & intervention (pp. 121–160). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, W. W (1978). The conceptualization of marriage and family dynamics from a psychoanalytic perspective. In T. J. Paolino & B. S. McCrady (Eds.), Marriage and marital therapy (pp. 25–88). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M & Erev-Irit, (1991). Attachment style and the structure of romantic love. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development. Child Development, 56, 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistole, C. (1994). Adult attachment styles: Some thoughts on closeness-distance struggles. Family Process, 33, 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistole, C., Clark, E., & Tubbs, A. (1995). Love relationships: Attachment style and the investment model. Journal of Mental Health Counselling. 17, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, D. (1995). Searching for a better story: Harnessing modern and post-modern positions in family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 17, 149–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radojevic, M. (1996). Adult attachment: Some considerations for family therapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 17, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager, C. (1976). Marriage contracts and couple therapy: Hidden forces in intimate relationships. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senchak, M., & Leonard, K. (1992). Attachment styles and marital adjustment among newlywed couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P. R., & Norman, A. J. (1995). Attachment theory and counselling psychology: A commentary. The Counselling Psychologist, 23, 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J., Rholes, W., & Nelligan, J. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slipp, S. (1984). Object relations: A dynamic bridge between individual and family therapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, M. B., & Berman, W. H. (Eds.) (1994). Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Epston, D. (1989). Literate means to therapeutic ends. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, L. C. (1984). The epigenesis of relational systems: A model for understanding family development. Family Process, 23, 297–318.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindegger, G., Barry, T. Attachment as an Integrating Concept in Couple and Family Therapy: Some Considerations with Special Reference to South Africa. Contemporary Family Therapy 21, 267–288 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021655727913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021655727913

Navigation